J Gen Virol Try IJSEM Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 12 (1971), 1-11; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-12-1-1
© 1971 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Long, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Long, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, D. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Long, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, D. C.

Interferon Production by Double-stranded RNA: A Comparison of Induction by Reovirus to that by a Synthetic Double-stranded Polynucleotide

W. F. Long and D. C. Burke*

Department of Biochemistry, Marischal College, University of Aberdeen, Scotland

Treatment of chick cells with reovirus resulted in the production of an inhibitor of virus replication which was characterized as an interferon. No infectious virus was released, nor could any virus-specific RNA synthesis be detected in cells receiving virus. The ability of reovirus to induce interferon formation in chick cells was less sensitive to irradiation with ultraviolet light than was its ability to produce infectious virus in L cells. These data suggest that the interferon was induced by the double-stranded RNA of the inoculum virus. Comparison of this system with that induced by a synthetic double-stranded polynucleotide showed that the latter was considerably less sensitive to the effects of metabolic inhibitors, suggesting that the two inducers do not stimulate interferon formation by the same mechanism. The effect of addition of two metabolic inhibitors simultaneously to cells previously treated with a synthetic polynucleotide suggests that their effect is not a direct one on the formation of an interferon messenger RNA and its translation.

* Present address: Division of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, Warwickshire.

Received 12 January 1971; accepted 1 March 1971.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Schweizer and E. Peterhans
Noncytopathic Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus Inhibits Double-Stranded RNA-Induced Apoptosis and Interferon Synthesis
J. Virol., May 15, 2001; 75(10): 4692 - 4698.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
B. Sherry, J. Torres, and M. A. Blum
Reovirus Induction of and Sensitivity to Beta Interferon in Cardiac Myocyte Cultures Correlate with Induction of Myocarditis and Are Determined by Viral Core Proteins
J. Virol., February 1, 1998; 72(2): 1314 - 1323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1971 by the Society for General Microbiology.