J Gen Virol Try Microbiology Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 13 (1971), 221-228; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-13-2-221
© 1971 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kassanis, B.
Right arrow Articles by Govier, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kassanis, B.
Right arrow Articles by Govier, D. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kassanis, B.
Right arrow Articles by Govier, D. A.

The Role of the Helper Virus in Aphid Transmission of Potato Aucuba Mosaic Virus and Potato Virus C

B. Kassanis and D. A. Govier

Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.

Potato aucuba mosaic virus and potato virus C were transmitted by the aphid Myzus persicae, not only from plants also infected with a helper virus, but also from plants infected with them alone, provided the aphids fed first on plants infected with the helper virus. Several different viruses acted as helpers but all are in the potato virus Y group. Helper viruses differed in the efficiency with which they aided potato aucuba mosaic virus and potato virus C, and some potato aucuba mosaic virus isolates were transmitted more frequently than others. With potato virus Y as helper, up to 30% of the aphids transmitted potato aucuba mosaic virus. Aphids were usually fed for brief periods on plants infected with the helper virus but aphids fed for 2 days also transmitted potato aucuba mosaic virus readily. Starving the aphids for 1 to 2 hr between their acquisition feeds on plants infected with helper and aided virus decreased but did not eliminate transmission.

The helper virus need not be infective; potato aucuba mosaic virus and potato virus C were transmitted as frequently when transmission of the helper virus was prevented by exposing the source leaf to u.v. radiation as when it was not. Virus was not transmitted by aphids fed through artificial membranes on extracts of leaves infected with potato virus Y, potato aucuba mosaic virus or a mixture of the two. However, potato aucuba mosaic virus was transmitted from extracts by aphids fed through membranes when the aphids had previously fed on a potato virus Y-infected leaf. Similarly, potato virus Y was transmitted from leaf extracts by aphids fed through membranes when the aphids had previously fed on a potato virus Y-infected leaf that had been irradiated with u.v. to prevent transmission of potato virus Y from this source.

Possible mechanisms for the transmission of the helper and aided viruses are discussed.

Received 27 May 1971; accepted 30 June 1971.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
A. Dombrovsky, N. Gollop, S. Chen, N. Chejanovsky, and B. Raccah
In vitro association between the helper component-proteinase of zucchini yellow mosaic virus and cuticle proteins of Myzus persicae
J. Gen. Virol., May 1, 2007; 88(5): 1602 - 1610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1971 by the Society for General Microbiology.