J Gen Virol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 15 (1972), 247-251; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-15-3-247
© 1972 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bancroft, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Flack, I. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bancroft, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Flack, I. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bancroft, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Flack, I. H.

The Behaviour of Cowpea Chlorotic Mottle Virus in CsCl

J. B. Bancroft and I. H. Flack

John Innes Institute, Colney Lane, Norwich, NOR 70 F, Norfolk England

Cowpea chlorotic mottle virus (CCMV) sediments as a single species but is heterogeneous when centrifuged in CsCl. The heterogeneity is not due to degradation. The original interpretation of the nucleoprotein distribution in CsCl was based on the assumption that two populations of particles of equal densities but different diffusion rates formed in CsCl, the more diffuse band being composed of monomers and the less of tetramers (Bancroft et al. 1968). However, in light of the recently demonstrated behaviour of CCMV-RNA in polyacrylamide gels (Fowlks & Young, 1970; Bancroft, 1971) and the correlation between band density and RNA size found by Lane & Kaesberg (1971) for brome mosaic virus which has a similar RNA distribution to that of CCMV, a reconsideration of the explanation for the behaviour of CCMV in CsCl was thought to be appropriate and is now presented.

CCMV was grown, purified and assayed as described (Bancroft et al. 1968).

Received 27 January 1972; accepted 18 February 1972.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1972 by the Society for General Microbiology.