J Gen Virol Try Microbiology Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 16 (1972), 61-68; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-16-1-61
© 1972 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eremenko, T.
Right arrow Articles by Volpe, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eremenko, T.
Right arrow Articles by Volpe, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eremenko, T.
Right arrow Articles by Volpe, P.

Virus Infection as a Function of the Host Cell Life Cycle: Replication of Poliovirus RNA

Tamilla Eremenko, A. Benedetto and P. Volpe

International Institute of Genetics and Biophysics, Via Marconi 12, Naples, and Centre for Virology, OORR, Rome, Italy

The rates of synthesis and final yields of poliovirus RNA varied considerably during the four main phases (G1, S, G2 and m) of the life cycle of synchronized HeLa cells. The rate of RNA synthesis late in virus growth (as measured by uridine incorporation 2 to 4 hr after infection) and the final yield of RNA rose sharply if growth was initiated towards the end of phase S; that is, RNA was synthesized most rapidly if cells were infected during the period of most rapid DNA synthesis. In contrast, the initial rate of RNA synthesis (incorporation 0 to 2 hr after infection) was greatest if growth was initiated at the end of phase G2, just before mitosis. This differential effect on growth kinetics suggests that the balance between the two stages of virus RNA synthesis (production of complementary minus strands and of progeny plus strands) is dependent on unknown cellular factors.

Received 21 December 1971; accepted 15 March 1972.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K.-S. Kim, N. M. Chapman, and S. Tracy
Replication of Coxsackievirus B3 in Primary Cell Cultures Generates Novel Viral Genome Deletions
J. Virol., February 15, 2008; 82(4): 2033 - 2037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
R. S. Fujinami, M. G. von Herrath, U. Christen, and J. L. Whitton
Molecular Mimicry, Bystander Activation, or Viral Persistence: Infections and Autoimmune Disease
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2006; 19(1): 80 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
R. Feuer, I. Mena, R. Pagarigan, M. K. Slifka, and J. L. Whitton
Cell Cycle Status Affects Coxsackievirus Replication, Persistence, and Reactivation In Vitro
J. Virol., March 27, 2002; 76(9): 4430 - 4440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1972 by the Society for General Microbiology.