J Gen Virol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 20 (1973), 127-137; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-20-2-127
© 1973 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleischmann, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleischmann, W. R., Jun.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, E. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fleischmann, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, E. H.

Effect of Interferon on Virus Production from Isolated Single Cells*

W. R. Fleischmann, Jun.{dagger} and E. H. Simon{ddagger}

Department of Biological Sciences Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, U.S.A.

Microdrops were used to isolate interferon treated mouse L cells infected with mengovirus. Three parameters were measured, (1) the time of virus yield, (2) the yield/cell, and (3) the percentage of yielding cells. More than 97% of the control single cells yielded an average of 167 p.f.u./cell with most of them yielding between 11 and 14 h post-infection. Cells treated with interferon yielded later than controls (if at all), and all could be protected to some degree. In both treated and control cells, virus was released over a period of about 15 min. Increasing the multiplicity of infection of challenge virus reduced the effectiveness of a given interferon dose, while increasing the concentration of interferon increased the length of the latent period, decreased the size of the yield, and decreased the number of yielding cells. On the basis of these observations it is proposed that (1) the direct effect of interferon protection is to delay a critical step in virus synthesis, (2) the reduction in yield size and in the number of yielders is due to a progressive loss of the inherent ability of the cell to produce virus, and (3) the delay is the result of interferon, or a molecule induced by it, acting as a competitive inhibitor of some cellular or virus product, needed for the completion of virus synthesis.

* Supported by grant GB 12623 from the National Science Foundation.

{dagger} Predoctoral fellow of the National Institute of Health, present address, Department of Microbiology, Indiana University.

{ddagger} Direct reprint requests to Edward H. Simon.

Received 11 October 1972; accepted 2 March 1973.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
D. R. Spotts, R. M. Reich, M. A. Kalkhan, R. M. Kinney, and J. T. Roehrig
Resistance to Alpha/Beta Interferons Correlates with the Epizootic and Virulence Potential of Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Viruses and Is Determined by the 5' Noncoding Region and Glycoproteins
J. Virol., December 1, 1998; 72(12): 10286 - 10291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Lloyd, J. Blalock, and G. Stanton
Cell-to-cell transfer of interferon-induced antiproliferative activity
Science, September 2, 1983; 221(4614): 953 - 955.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1973 by the Society for General Microbiology.