J Gen Virol Try IJSEM Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 20 (1973), 43-60; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-20-Supplement-43
© 1973 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, F.
Right arrow Articles by Hull, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, F.
Right arrow Articles by Hull, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Brown, F.
Right arrow Articles by Hull, R.

Comparative Virology of the Small RNA Viruses

F. Brown

Animal Virus Research Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, England

R. Hull

John Innes Institute, Norwich, England

The structural system in the small RNA viruses is the same for all the viruses examined so far, with the possible exceptions of the pea enation mosaic virus middle componenet, tobacco streak virus and alfalfa mosaic virus. While there is a greater variation in the structural arrangements of the different viruses, all appear to ppossess icosahedral symmetry or a structure based on the such a symmetry.

All the viruses contain single-stranded RNA. Most contain only one species of RNA with a mol. wt. of approxiamately 1.1 x 106 for the paheges and 2.6 x 106fot eh vertebrate viruses genomes in which two or three different species of RNA are required for inspection. The possession of a split genome may not be confined to the smal RNA viruses of plants in viewe of the recent observations with Nodamura virus referred to above. This virus is particularly interesting in this respect since it inffects both vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. Little is known about the RNAs of the other invertebrate viruses

The number of proteins in the viruses varies from 1 to 4. This great variation compared with, for example, the rhabdoviruses presumably can be tolerated because of the very effective packaging invol ved in icosahefral symmetry.

One of the most exciting prospects in the small RNA viruses is the understandin g of the way in which the replication of the prospects of the split genome viruses is organiozed. The determination of this requires a suitable technique which may be provided by the protoplast system (Takebe & Ots, 1969). A study of the replication of Nodamura virus in mice, bees or waxmoths, which it kills, and in mosquitoes, whick it does not kill, also provide an engaging comparison.

The small RNA viruses from different organisms each have characteristics properties. for example, most of the viruses from vertebrates have a single species of RNA of mol. wt. about 2.5 x106 and four capsid proteins whereas most of those from bacteria have an RNA of about 1 x 106 and two capsied proteins. These differences probably reflect the adaptations of the baic desig n of the vitrus to the various host systems.

the authors would like to thank Prigfessor J.B. Ba ncroft for the f migure he generously supplied and also t he Academic Press for permitting its use.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1973 by the Society for General Microbiology.