J Gen Virol Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 31 (1976), 231-237; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-31-2-231
© 1976 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, F.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, T. J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, F.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, T. J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Brown, F.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, T. J. R.

Comparison of Swine Vesicular Disease Virus and Coxsackie B5 Virus by Serological and RNA Hybridization Methods

F. Brown, T. F. Wild, L. W. Rowe, B. O. Underwood and T. J. R. Harris

Animal Virus Research Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, U.K.

The relatedness of swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV) and Coxsackie B5 virus has been studied by virus neutralization and immunodiffusion tests and by hybridization of the virus RNAs. Clearly defined differences between the two viruses were found by the three methods. Isolates of SVDV from several countries were very closely related but could be differentiated. Recent isolates of Coxsackie B5 virus also appeared to be similar but clear differences could be detected between these and the prototype (Faulkner) strain of the virus. The SVDV isolates were more closely related to the Faulkner strain than to the recent isolates of Coxsackie B5 virus. Perhaps of more importance, the Faulkner strain was more closely related to SVDV than it was to the recent Coxsackie B5 isolates. The significance of these observations in relation to the recent emergence of swine vesicular disease is discussed.

Received 8 September 1975; accepted 7 January 1976.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
T. Kanno, D. Mackay, T. Inoue, G. Wilsden, M. Yamakawa, R. Yamazoe, S. Yamaguchi, J. Shirai, P. Kitching, and Y. Murakami
Mapping the Genetic Determinants of Pathogenicity and Plaque Phenotype in Swine Vesicular Disease Virus
J. Virol., April 1, 1999; 73(4): 2710 - 2716.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
S. Nijhar, D. Mackay, E Brocchi, N. Ferris, R. Kitching, and N. Knowles
Identification of neutralizing epitopes on a European strain of swine vesicular disease virus
J. Gen. Virol., February 1, 1999; 80(2): 277 - 282.
[Abstract]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1976 by the Society for General Microbiology.