J Gen Virol Try IJSEM Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 32 (1976), 227-240; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-32-2-227
© 1976 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Metz, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Oxman, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Metz, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Oxman, M. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Metz, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Oxman, M. N.

Mechanism of Interferon Action: Further Evidence for Transcription as the Primary Site of Action in Simian Virus 40 Infection

D. H. Metz*, M. J. Levin{dagger} and M. N. Oxman

Virus Research Unit, Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 U.S.A.

Interferon inhibits the replication of simian virus 40 (SV40) in monkey cells and reduces markedly the formation of both early virus protein (i.e. SV40 T antigen) and early SV40 RNA. This suggests that in SV40 infection interferon acts primarily by inhibiting transcription. To test this conclusion further, we examined alternative mechanisms which might explain these results and made the following observations. (1) The quantity of input SV40 DNA in the nucleus 24 h post infection (p.i.) was the same in interferon-treated and control cells. Thus interferon does not appear to diminish the quantity of SV40 DNA template available for transcription. (2) Chemical inhibitors of protein synthesis did not mimic the selective inhibition of early SV40 RNA formation induced by interferon, indicating that the transcription of early SV40 RNA is not dependent upon the prior synthesis of any virus-induced protein. Thus a block in translation cannot readily explain the reduced formation of early SV40 RNA in interferon-treated cells. (3) Fractionation of SV40 infected cells after a one-hour labelling period showed that interferon produced a comparable reduction in the quantity of early SV40 RNA in the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Thus the observed inhibition of early SV40 RNA is not due solely (if at all) to enhanced cytoplasmic degradation. These results indicate that the primary effect of interferon in SV40 infected monkey cells is either to inhibit the transcription of early virus RNA or to enhance its turnover in the nucleus.

* Present address: National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, England.

{dagger} Present address: Sidney Farber Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 U.S.A.

Received 22 March 1976; accepted 30 March 1976.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1976 by the Society for General Microbiology.