J Gen Virol Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 35 (1977), 135-148; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-35-1-135
© 1977 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barker, H.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barker, H.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, B. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Barker, H.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, B. D.

The Interaction between Raspberry Ringspot and Tobacco Rattle Viruses in Doubly Infected Protoplasts

H. Barker and B. D. Harrison

Scottish Horticultural Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, Scotland

Tobacco mesophyll protoplasts infected with raspberry ringspot virus (RRV) show faint generalized staining when treated with fluorescent antibody to RRV, but many brightly staining granules develop after inoculation with a mixture of RRV and the CAM strain of tobacco rattle virus (TRV-CAM). The phenomenon occurred with three different strains of RRV but not when tobacco mosaic virus, or two other strains of tobacco rattle virus, were substituted for the CAM strain. The RRV antigen aggregates were produced only in protoplasts that synthesized TRV-CAM nucleoprotein, and they seemed not to result from enhanced accumulation of RRV. They were also produced in intact leaves of doubly infected Nicotiana benthamiana plants, and in protoplasts from singly infected plants that were superinfected with the second virus of the pair.

On mixing in vitro in a wide range of conditions, purified preparations of RRV and TRV-CAM formed aggregates containing particles of both viruses, and this reaction had the same virus and strain specificity as the production of RRV antigen aggregates in vivo. Aggregation seems to result from a reaction that increases hydrophobicity and not from electrostatic attraction of particles of opposite charge. It is concluded that the production of these aggregates in vivo results from a redistribution of RRV particles or coat protein within the protoplast or cell, and that this occurs because of the affinity between RRV particle antigen and TRV-CAM nucleoprotein, the longer particles of which accumulate predominantly on the surface of mitochondria.

Received 11 October 1976; accepted 19 November 1976.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1977 by the Society for General Microbiology.