J Gen Virol Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 36 (1977), 413-424; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-36-3-413
© 1977 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diglio, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dougherty, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diglio, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dougherty, R. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Diglio, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dougherty, R. M.

Control of Transformed Focus Morphology in Chicken Cell Cultures Infected with Rous Sarcoma Virus

Clement A. Diglio* and Robert M. Dougherty

Department of Microbiology, State University of New York, Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York 13210, U.S.A.

Factors that control focus morphology in cell cultures infected with Bryan strain Rous sarcoma virus (B-RSV) were examined. Cloning experiments with the roundc-cell (morphr) and fusiform cell (morphf) variants of RSV (Temin, 1960), confirmed that the two mutant viruses breed true and that these two distinct focus types were under the control of the virus genome.

Three subvariants of the morphr focus type were described which failed to breed true in cloning experiments. It was concluded that this type of focus variation was not due to virus mutation.

Variation in focus morphology was observed when RSV was plated on chick embryo fibroblast cell lines from different sources, as reflected in the relative frequency of expression of the three morphr focus types. These variations were exhibited between fibroblast cell lines of different genetic background, indicating that the cell genome had an influence on focus expression. Focus expression also varied in fibroblast cell lines from chickens of different ages. The strongest host influence on focus expression was observed with fibroblast cell lines derived from selected individual tissue of single embryos. The latter two factors (age and tissue origin) suggested that the differentiated state of the cells also influences RSV focus morphology.

* Present address: Department of Pathology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York 10595, U.S.A.

Received 15 February 1977; accepted 7 April 1977.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1977 by the Society for General Microbiology.