J Gen Virol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 37 (1977), 249-258; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-37-2-249
© 1977 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kingsman, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kingsman, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kingsman, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, H.

The Localization of Influenza Virus in the Respiratory Tract of Ferrets: the Different Susceptibilities of Fresh and Maintained Organ Cultures

S. M. Kingsman*, G. L. Toms and H. Smith

Department of Microbiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K.

Tissues of the upper respiratory tract of ferrets are more susceptible to influenza virus infection than those of the lower respiratory tract. An organ culture technique has been standardized sufficiently to examine the basis for these differences.

In experiments with an Asian and two Hong Kong influenza viruses maintenance of organ cultures for 24 h before inoculation consistently and markedly increased the susceptibility of lung, the least susceptible tissue. The susceptibility of the most susceptible tissue, nasal turbinates, was increased significantly (but to a lesser extent than lung) in some experiments but not others. Tracheal organ cultures showed two patterns of susceptibility; about half were poorly susceptible but showed a marked increase with maintenance. The remainder were moderately susceptible and showed no increase with maintenance.

The increased susceptibility of lung with maintenance was not due to fibroblast outgrowth, to loss of inhibitory material easily removed by washing, to killing of commensal bacteria by the bactericidal medium nor to changes in mucus distribution. Although central necrosis occurred in the maintained tissue pieces it was not correlated with increased susceptibility and virus replicated only in peripheral cells which remained healthy throughout culturing. The increase in susceptibility was demonstrated after maintenance for 6 h and increased to a maximum by 24 h.

The reason for the low susceptibility of the lung in vivo may be established by comparing organ cultures of fresh lung and nasal turbinates and by analysing the basis for the increased susceptibility of the lung with maintenance.

* Present address: Department of Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, Scotland.

Received 7 April 1977; accepted 31 May 1977.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1977 by the Society for General Microbiology.