J Gen Virol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 42 (1979), 363-372; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-42-2-363
© 1979 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v43,pNP)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blalock, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Baron, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blalock, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Baron, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Blalock, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Baron, S.

Mechanisms of Interferon Induced Transfer of Viral Resistance Between Animal Cells

J. Edwin Blalock and Samuel Baron

Department of Microbiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77550, U.S.A.

The sequence of events initiated by interferon and leading to the antiviral state were studied as possible sites for the cell-to-cell transfer of interferon induced viral resistance. The possible role of interferon produced by recipient cells was negated by the demonstration of transfer of resistance in the presence of anti-human interferon antibody and under conditions of a single cycle of VSV growth. Transfer of sensitivity of WISH cells to mouse interferon, possibly through transfer of a membrane receptor, seems unlikely since resistance was transferred in the absence of mouse interferon. From kinetic data and the fact that actinomycin D blocked resistance in human cells for 3 h longer than in mouse cells, it seems unlikely that the mouse antiviral protein itself or its mRNA alone is a likely candidate for the transfer of resistance. Thus, by a process of elimination, we suggest that secondary messenger molecules which transmit the interferon signal from the membrane to the nucleus are the effector substance(s) for the transfer process.

Received 10 April 1978; accepted 30 August 1978.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Lloyd, J. Blalock, and G. Stanton
Cell-to-cell transfer of interferon-induced antiproliferative activity
Science, September 2, 1983; 221(4614): 953 - 955.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1979 by the Society for General Microbiology.