J Gen Virol Try IJSEM Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 47 (1980), 67-77; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-47-1-67
© 1980 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paul, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Huth, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Paul, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Huth, W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Paul, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Huth, W.

Serological Studies on the Relationships of Some Isometric Viruses of Gramineae

H. L. Paul, Gertrud Querfurth and W. Huth

Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Institut für Viruskrankheiten der Pflanzen, Braunschweig, West Germany

Particles of 17 isolates of viruses from Gramineae were purified and the virus relationships assessed by different serological techniques. From the reaction end-points of antisera in agar gel double diffusion tests the serological differentiation indices of reciprocal tests were calculated. These indices were used to construct a scheme of serological interrelationship. Spur formation tests were used to distinguish between closely related, non-identical viruses. The isolates were shown to belong to four groups, one of which (the cocksfoot mild mosaicpanicum mosaic virus group) contains most of the isolates and can be subdivided into two main clusters (typified by cocksfoot mild mosaic and panicum mosaic viruses, respectively). Additional information was obtained by immunoelectrophoresis of the viruses with their homologous antisera and by the determination of the mol. wt. of the coat protein subunits using SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The data obtained by both methods agree with the above mentioned results, although some minor differences were found between the immunoelectrophoretic patterns of panicum mosaic virus and its relatives and also the three isolates of Cynosurus mottle virus. Reversed rocket electrophoresis did not provide any information of use in virus grouping. Brome mosaic virus did not react with the antisera to the 17 viruses, but tobacco mosaic virus reacted weakly with all the antisera and also with one of the antisera to brome mosaic virus. These and other recently published results are discussed.

Received 22 June 1979; accepted 5 October 1979.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1980 by the Society for General Microbiology.