J Gen Virol Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 63 (1982), 375-381; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-63-2-375
© 1982 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cartwright, B.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cartwright, B.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cartwright, B.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, F.

Nature of the Antibody Response to the Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Particle, its 12S Protein Subunit and the Isolated Immunizing Polypeptide VP1

B. Cartwright, D. J. Morrell and F. Brown

Animal Virus Research Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, U.K.

Inoculation of inactivated 146S foot-and-mouth disease virus particles into guineapigs elicited the formation of neutralizing antibody and the serum had a 10-fold higher titre in radioimmunoassay (RIA) with 146S particles than with the 12S virus subunit. In contrast, a single inoculation of the 12S subunit or the isolated polypeptide VP1 elicited the formation of antibody having a much lower titre in RIA with the 146S particle than with the 12S subunit and low or undetectable neutralizing activity. However, sera from guinea-pigs given two or more inoculations of the 12S subunit or VP1 had neutralizing activity. The level in the anti-VP1 serum was lower than that in the anti-12S serum and both were much lower than that in animals receiving two inoculations of the 146S particle. The neutralizing activity elicited by the three antigens was absorbed by the homologous antigen. In contrast, neither the 12S subunit nor VP1 absorbed the anti-146S neutralizing antibody and VP1 did not absorb the anti-12S subunit neutralizing antibody. However, the 12S subunit partly absorbed the neutralizing activity elicited by VP1. The results are compatible with a model in which the 146S particle elicits a spectrum of neutralizing antibodies which are completely absorbed by the homologous particle but only partially by the 12S subunit or VP1. The results are discussed in relation to the structural features required for the production of neutralizing antibody.

Keywords: foot-and-mouth disease virus, 12S subunit, immunizing polypeptide, antibody

Received 1 June 1982; accepted 20 July 1982.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1982 by the Society for General Microbiology.