J Gen Virol Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 64 (1983), 2093-2101; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-64-10-2093
© 1983 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pedley, S.
Right arrow Articles by McCrae, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pedley, S.
Right arrow Articles by McCrae, M. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pedley, S.
Right arrow Articles by McCrae, M. A.

Molecular Characterization of Rotaviruses with Distinct Group Antigens

S. Pedley1, J. C. Bridger2, J. F. Brown2 and M. A. McCrae1

1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL
and2 Agricultural Research Council Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Nr. Newbury, Berks., U.K.

Comparative serological and nucleic acid studies were carried out on rotavirus isolates, with and without the original group antigen. Indirect immunofluorescence allowed the atypical isolates to be divided into two groups each with its own distinct group antigen hence giving a total of at least three distinct rotavirus groups. Genome profile analysis of the atypical isolates again divided them into two groups which corresponded with those obtained by immunofluorescence and within which the overall pattern of genome segments was similar. A more rigorous examination of the degree of difference between the three virus groups was carried out using single-dimension terminal fingerprint analysis. This indicated that the viruses in the three groups did not carry any genome segments in common with each other. Therefore, experimental criteria have been established which allow the division of rotaviruses into three groups. Analysis of further atypical isolates, as they become available, will establish whether the division of rotaviruses into a number of separate groups, of the type seen in influenza virus, is justified.

Keywords: rotavirus, antigen, fingerprinting, group

Received 25 May 1983; accepted 28 June 1983.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
H. Tsunemitsu, M. Kamiyama, K. Kawashima, K. Katsuda, M. Kohmoto, L. J. Saif, T. Shouji, and T. Onodera
Molecular characterization of the major capsid protein VP6 of bovine group B rotavirus and its use in seroepidemiology
J. Gen. Virol., September 1, 2005; 86(9): 2569 - 2575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
J. P. Cook and M. A. McCrae
Sequence analysis of the guanylyltransferase (VP3) of group A rotaviruses
J. Gen. Virol., April 1, 2004; 85(4): 929 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1983 by the Society for General Microbiology.