J Gen Virol Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 64 (1983), 1405-1408; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-64-6-1405
© 1983 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boere, W. A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Snippe, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boere, W. A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Snippe, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Boere, W. A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Snippe, H.

Neutralizing and Non-neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies to the E2 Glycoprotein of Semliki Forest Virus Can Protect Mice from Lethal Encephalitis

Wil A. M. Boere, Barry J. Benaissa-Trouw, M. Harmsen, C. A. Kraaijeveld and H. Snippe

Laboratory of Microbiology, State University of Utrecht, Catharijnesingel 59, 3511 GG Utrecht, The Netherlands

Two monoclonal antibodies (UM 4.2 and UM 5.1) directed against the glycoprotein E2 of Semliki Forest virus (SFV) are described; both belong to the IgG2a isotype but are of different idiotype. Analysis employing isoelectric focusing resulted in different focusing patterns for both monoclonals (UM 4.2, pI 8; UM 5.1, pI 7.2). They further differed in their ability to neutralize virus. The UM 4.2 antibodies were inactive in neutralization, while the UM 5.1 antibodies exceeded conventional mouse hyperimmune serum in this respect. Both monoclonal antibodies, however, were able to protect mice passively from a lethal infection with SFV. Based on the amount of protein, the UM 5.1 antibodies were 100-fold more effective than the UM 4.2 antibodies in mouse protection tests.

Keywords: SFV, monoclonal antibodies, protective immunity

Received 7 September 1982; accepted 19 January 1983.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
F. Verrier, A. Nadas, M. K. Gorny, and S. Zolla-Pazner
Additive Effects Characterize the Interaction of Antibodies Involved in Neutralization of the Primary Dualtropic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolate 89.6
J. Virol., October 1, 2001; 75(19): 9177 - 9186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1983 by the Society for General Microbiology.