J Gen Virol Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 66 (1985), 2627-2634; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-66-12-2627
© 1985 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamahora, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kurimura, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kamahora, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kurimura, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kamahora, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kurimura, T.

Oligonucleotide Fingerprint Analysis of Coxsackievirus A10 Isolated in Japan

Toshio Kamahora, Asao Itagaki1, Naohiko Hattori, Hideaki Tsuchie and Takashi Kurimura

Department of Virology, Tottori University School of Medicine, 86, Nishimachi, Yonago 683
and1 Shimane Prefectural Institute of Public Health and Environmental Science, Matsue, Shimane 690-01, Japan

Eight coxsackievirus A10 strains isolated in 1978 and in 1981 and 1982 from patients with hand, foot-and-mouth disease and with herpangina at a dispensary in Matsue city were compared by RNA fingerprinting techniques. The oligonucleotide maps of the four 1978 isolates were related to each other by 85 to 93% with respect to their large T1 oligonucleotides. In contrast, the oligonucleotide maps of the four 1981 and 1982 isolates were very different from each other. Co-electrophoresis experiments revealed that the 1981 and 1982 strains shared only 17 to 34% of their large oligonucleotides. In addition, some large oligonucleotides were found in most of the fingerprint maps of isolates from 1978 to 1982, suggesting that there are regions in the genome of coxsackievirus A10 which are not subject to mutational changes.

Keywords: coxsackievirus A10, oligonucleotide fingerprinting, molecular epidemiology

Received 4 April 1985; accepted 29 August 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1985 by the Society for General Microbiology.