J Gen Virol Try Microbiology Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 67 (1986), 131-137; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-67-1-131
© 1986 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pedley, S.
Right arrow Articles by McCrae, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pedley, S.
Right arrow Articles by McCrae, M. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pedley, S.
Right arrow Articles by McCrae, M. A.

Definition of Two New Groups of Atypical Rotaviruses

S. Pedley1, J. C. Bridger2, D. Chasey3 and M. A. McCrae1

1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL
2 AFRC Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Nr. Newbury, Berkshire RG16 0NN
and3 Central Veterinary Laboratory, New Haw, Weybridge, Surrey KT15 3NB, U.K.

Comparative antigenic and nucleic acid analyses were carried out on two new atypical rotavirus isolates coming respectively from chickens (D/132) and pigs (E/DC-9). Indirect immunofluorescence showed that each virus carried different group antigens which were also distinct from those of previously described rotavirus groups. By genome profile analysis each virus had a pattern of genomic RNAs clearly distinct from those of the other rotavirus groups. Comparative terminal fingerprinting of corresponding genome segments from the two viruses showed large differences between them, indicating that all of their genomic RNAs had significant differences in sequence both from each other and from the three previously defined rotavirus groups. On the basis of these results, extension of the number of rotavirus groups from three to five is proposed, with isolates D/132 and E/DC-9 being the type members of groups D and E respectively.

Keywords: rotaviruses, atypical, RNA, groups

Received 2 July 1985; accepted 24 September 1985.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
J. P. Cook and M. A. McCrae
Sequence analysis of the guanylyltransferase (VP3) of group A rotaviruses
J. Gen. Virol., April 1, 2004; 85(4): 929 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
V. L. A. James, P. R. Lambden, Y. Deng, E. O. Caul, and I. N. Clarke
Molecular characterization of human group C rotavirus genes 6, 7 and 9
J. Gen. Virol., December 1, 1999; 80(12): 3181 - 3187.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1986 by the Society for General Microbiology.