J Gen Virol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 69 (1988), 2645-2651; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-69-10-2645
© 1988 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheshberadaran, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tkachenko, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheshberadaran, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tkachenko, E. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sheshberadaran, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tkachenko, E. A.

Antigenic Relationship between Hantaviruses Analysed by Immunoprecipitation

Hooshmand Sheshberadaran1, Bo Niklasson1,2,3, and Evgeni A. Tkachenko4

1 Department of Virology, Karolinska Institute, c/o SBL, S-105 21 Stockholm
2 Department of Virology, National Bacteriological Laboratory, S-105 21 Stockholm
3 Swedish Defense Research Establishment, FOA-5, Box 27322, S-102 54 Stockholm, Sweden
and4 Arenavirus Laboratory, Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides, Academy of Medical Science, 142782 Moscow, U.S.S.R.

Antigenic relationships between seven hantaviruses isolated in Sweden, Belgium, Korea, European U.S.S.R. and Asian U.S.S.R. were studied by radioimmunoprecipitation assays (RIPA) and indirect immunofluorescence tests (IFT). Animal immune sera and haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) patient sera from the above countries were used. The strains fell into three antigenic groups by both RIPA and IFT:nephropathia epidemica (NE)-type, Korean haemorrhagic fever (KHF)-type and urban rat-type. This antigenic grouping conforms to the clinical grouping of the respective HFRS patients. The major cross-reactive antigen between the antigenic groups was the nucleocapsid protein. Of the two viral glycoproteins, the G2 exhibited weak cross-reactivity between the groups, while the G1 protein appeared to be the least cross-reactive. Patient sera collected at different intervals after the onset of disease showed a marked difference in their capacity to immunoprecipitate the homologous viral glycoproteins, although by IFT all sera had high titres. Host species-related antibody response differences were found by both RIPA and IFT. Using patient sera, a one-way cross-reactivity was seen between the NE-type and the KHF-type viruses. However, animal immune sera clearly demonstrated a reciprocal cross-reactivity between the two virus groups.

Keywords: HFRS, hantaviruses, serotyping

Received 5 January 1988; accepted 30 June 1988.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CVIHome page
F. Magurano and L. Nicoletti
Humoral Response in Toscana Virus Acute Neurologic Disease Investigated by Viral-Protein-Specific Immunoassays
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., January 1, 1999; 6(1): 55 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1988 by the Society for General Microbiology.