J Gen Virol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 70 (1989), 3355-3362; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-70-12-3355
© 1989 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hussein, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Beaty, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hussein, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Beaty, B. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hussein, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Beaty, B. J.

Asynchronous Mixed Infection of Culicoides variipennis with Bluetongue Virus Serotypes 10 and 17

A. El Hussein1, R. F. Ramig2, F. R. Holbrook3 and B. J. Beaty1

1 Department of Microbiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523
2 Division of Molecular Virology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030
and3 Arthropod-Borne Animal Disease Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, University Station, P.O. Box 3965, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, U.S.A.

Culicoides variipennis (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) the primary vector of bluetongue virus (BTV) in the U.S.A. were asynchronously mixedly infected with two BTV serotypes (BTV-10 and BTV-17); flies first ingested a blood meal that contained BTV-17 and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 days later selected flies ingested a second blood meal that contained BTV-10. Control flies ingested each parental virus separately, or both viruses simultaneously, in a single blood meal. Electrophoretic analysis of progeny virus clones indicated that superinfection with BTV-10 occurred when the flies ingested the second virus 1, 3 and 5 days post-initial infection. Parental BTV-17 and reassortant virus clones were isolated from these flies, but parental BTV-10 virus was not isolated from any flies. Reassortant clone frequencies were 67%, 71% and 17% when superinfection occurred on days 1, 3 and 5 after initial infection, respectively, as compared to 48% for simultaneously infected flies. Only parental BTV-17 clones were isolated from flies that ingested the second virus on days 7 and 9 after initial BTV-17 infection. The results indicated that interference to superinfection occurred in C. variipennis by 5 days and flies were refractory to superinfection by 7 days post-initial infection. Analysis of segregation of the parental origin of genome segments in the reassortant clones indicated selection against most segments of BTV-10 parental origin. This occurred both in individual flies and in individual groups. The fact that C. variipennis readily fed on a second blood meal and their ability to produce new viral genotypes suggested that these vectors are highly permissive hosts for evolution of BTV by genome reassortment.

Keywords: bluetongue virus, interference, genome reassortment, asynchronous vector infection

Received 28 March 1989; accepted 29 August 1989.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1989 by the Society for General Microbiology.