J Gen Virol Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 71 (1990), 1607-1611; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-71-7-1607
© 1990 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho-Terry, L.
Right arrow Articles by Londesborough, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ho-Terry, L.
Right arrow Articles by Londesborough, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ho-Terry, L.
Right arrow Articles by Londesborough, P.

Diagnosis of foetal rubella virus infection by polymerase chain reaction

Linda Ho-Terry1, George M. Terry2 and Philip Londesborough1

1 Department of Medical Microbiology
and2 Department of Chemical Pathology, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, University College London, 46 Cleveland Street, London W1P 6DB, U.K.

We have used the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to provide a very sensitive and unequivocal test for diagnosis of foetal rubella virus infection. RNA extracted from biopsy specimens (chorionic villi), placenta or products of conception was reversetranscribed using a rubella virus-specific oligonucleotide primer and the cDNA was amplified by PCR. The specificity of the amplified fragment was confirmed by Southern blotting. Detection of rubella virus infection in five out of 41 clinical specimens examined by this approach was shown to be entirely consistent with clinical history and other methods of laboratory diagnosis in current use. The sensitivity of the test and the unequivocal nature of the results obtained could be invaluable in providing prenatal counselling following rubella virus infection during pregnancy.

Received 22 December 1989; accepted 22 February 1990.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
N. Mori, Y. Motegi, Y. Shimamura, T. Ezaki, T. Natsumeda, T. Yonekawa, Y. Ota, T. Notomi, and T. Nakayama
Development of a new method for diagnosis of rubella virus infection by reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification.
J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2006; 44(9): 3268 - 3273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. del Mar Mosquera, F. de Ory, M. Moreno, and J. E. Echevarria
Simultaneous Detection of Measles Virus, Rubella Virus, and Parvovirus B19 by Using Multiplex PCR
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2002; 40(1): 111 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
I. E. Souza and J. F. Bale JR
Topical Review: The Diagnosis of Congenital Infections: Contemporary Strategies
J Child Neurol, July 1, 1995; 10(4): 271 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1990 by the Society for General Microbiology.