J Gen Virol Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 72 (1991), 2827-2830; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-72-11-2827
© 1991 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirayama, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yamanouchi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirayama, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yamanouchi, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hirayama, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yamanouchi, K.

Protective effects of monoclonal antibodies against lethal canine distemper virus infection in mice

Norio Hirayama1, Megumi Senda1, Naohiko Nakashima1, Masami Takagi1, Makoto Sugiyama2, Yasuhiro Yoshikawa3 and Kazuya Yamanouchi4

1 National Veterinary Assay Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 1-15-1 Tokura, Kokubunji, Tokyo 185
2 Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Agriculture, Gifu University, Yanagido, Gifu 501-11
3 Tsukuba Primate Center, National Institute of Health, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305
and4 Laboratory Animal Research Center, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108, Japan

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against the haemagglutinin (H), fusion protein (F) and nucleoprotein of canine distemper virus (CDV) were examined for their ability to protect mice against lethal CDV infection. One MAb against H and two of six MAbs against F protected mice, the protective effect of the anti-H MAb being stronger than that of the anti-F MAbs. The anti-H MAb showed virus neutralizing activity, but the two anti-F MAbs, which recognized the same epitope, did not. Protection by the anti-F MAbs correlated with cell fusion inhibition, but not with complement-dependent neutralization, complement-dependent cytolysis or antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. These results suggest that neutralization by antibody against H and cell fusion inhibition by antibody against F play important roles in the protective mechanism against CDV infection.

Received 12 March 1991; accepted 15 July 1991.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
N. Sixt, A. Cardoso, A. Vallier, J. Fayolle, R. Buckland, and T. F. Wild
Canine Distemper Virus DNA Vaccination Induces Humoral and Cellular Immunity and Protects against a Lethal Intracerebral Challenge
J. Virol., November 1, 1998; 72(11): 8472 - 8476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1991 by the Society for General Microbiology.