J Gen Virol Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 73 (1992), 3219-3224; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-73-12-3219
© 1992 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. A. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. A. C.

Resistance to phloem transport of potato leafroll virus in potato plants

C. R. Wilson1,2,{dagger} and R. A. C. Jones1

1 Department of Agriculture, Baron-Hay Court, South Perth 6151, Western Australia
and2 Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, University of Western Australia, Nedlands 6009, Western Australia

A ‘double-graft sandwich’ technique in which sections of potato stem from different potato cultivars were grafted between a susceptible healthy stock plant and a potato leafroll virus (PLRV)-infected scion was used to study the rate of phloem transport of PLRV in cultivars differing in resistance to PLRV infection (IR) and accumulation (AR). Resistance to phloem transport (i.e. delayed PLRV systemic movement) was found in Bismark cultivar (IR AS). This was independent of IR and AR as the rate of movement in Bismark cultivar was markedly slower than that in Omega and Spunta (IR AR), Delaware (IS AR), and Desiree and Renova (IS AS) cultivars. It operated in Bismark cultivar stems of two different ages, but did not operate against potato virus X (PVX) and was not influenced by previous infection with this virus. Aphid vector (Myzus persicae) feeding preferences and colonization rates differed between cultivars, but the cultivar characteristics responsible were unrelated to IR, AR or resistance to phloem transport. Delayed systemic movement of PLRV out of leaves inoculated with viruliferous aphids was independent of AR and resistance to phloem transport, and remained unaffected by previous infection with PVX. It was also independent of cultivar factors causing different aphid feeding preferences and colonization rates, but may be linked to IR.

{dagger} Present address: New Town Research Laboratories, Department of Primary Industry, Fisheries and Energy, Hobart, Tasmania 7008, Australia.

Received 18 June 1992; accepted 3 September 1992.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
M. N. Guerini and J. F. Murphy
Resistance of Capsicum annuum `Avelar' to pepper mottle potyvirus and alleviation of this resistance by co-infection with cucumber mosaic cucumovirus are associated with virus movement
J. Gen. Virol., October 1, 1999; 80(10): 2785 - 2792.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 by the Society for General Microbiology.