J Gen Virol Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 73 (1992), 743-748; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-73-3-743
© 1992 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ye, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ye, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, R. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ye, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, R. R.

Down-regulation of vesicular stomatitis virus transcription by the matrix protein of influenza virus

Zhiping Ye and Robert R. Wagner

Department of Microbiology and Cancer Center, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, U.S.A.

The matrix (M1) protein isolated from influenza A/WSN/33 virus, when reconstituted with ribonucleo-protein (RNP) cores of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), resulted in inhibition of VSV transcription in vitro. The presence of endogenous wild-type (wt) or mutant (tsO23) VSV matrix (M) protein on RNP cores did not prevent down-regulation of VSV transcription by reconstituted influenza virus M1 protein. In fact, endogenous VSV wt M protein augmented transcription inhibition by M1 protein reconstituted with RNP/M protein cores, whereas mutant tsO23 M protein endogenous to RNP cores had no effect on down-regulation of VSV transcription by M1 protein. These data suggest that VSV M protein and influenza virus M1 protein recognize two different sites on RNP cores responsible for down-regulation of VSV transcription. Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed to epitope 2 of M1 protein had been previously shown to reverse transcription inhibition by M1 protein on influenza virus RNP cores, but the same epitope 2-specific MAb had little effect on transcription inhibition by M1 protein reconstituted with VSV RNP cores. VSV M protein bears a striking resemblance biologically and genetically to the M1 protein, including, as shown here, their capacity to bind viral RNA. However, the VSV wt M protein exhibited no capacity to down-regulate transcription by influenza virus RNP cores. The significance of these studies is the identification on VSV RNP templates of at least two separate sites for recognition of protein factors that repress VSV transcription.

Received 6 August 1991; accepted 1 November 1991.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 by the Society for General Microbiology.