HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by El-Ghorr, A. A. Articles by Maratos-Flier, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by El-Ghorr, A. A. Articles by Maratos-Flier, E. Agricola Articles by El-Ghorr, A. A. Articles by Maratos-Flier, E.

Regulation of expression of the reovirus receptor on differentiated HL60 cells

Elliott P. Joslin Research Laboratory, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, One Joslin Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, U.S.A.

The reovirus receptor on mammalian cells has not been fully characterized and controversy exists over the nature of this receptor. We report here that the expression of this receptor is dependent on the differentiation status of a human promyelocytic leukaemia cell line (HL60). Phorbol treatment of HL60 cells for 24 h, at a concentration range of 160 nM down to 1 nM, led to differentiation of these cells towards monocytes and a loss of approximately 80% of their ability to bind reovirus in a fluorescence assay. These cells also lost their susceptibility to T1 and T3 reovirus infection. DMSO treatment for 24 h at a concentration of 1.25% (v/v) led to differentiation towards granulocytes. This was accompanied by an increase of approximately 15% in binding of reovirus to these cells. After being infected by T1 or T3 reovirus, the granulocytes produced higher titres of progeny virus than did untreated HL60 cells. Similar differences were noted when virus binding to HL60 cells was assayed using radiolabelled reovirus. These effects were not detected when murine L fibroblasts were treated with DMSO or phorbol. ATCC-derived murine R1.1 cells did not bind reovirus. Competition data indicated that there may be two reovirus receptors on HL60 cells, and that T1 can bind to only one receptor whereas T3 can bind to both receptors. Our data also suggested that the -adrenergic receptor was unlikely to act as the reovirus receptor on HL60 cells.

Received 24 January 1992; accepted 6 April 1992.