J Gen Virol Try Microbiology Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 74 (1993), 169-174; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-74-2-169
© 1993 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viry, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pinck, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Viry, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pinck, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Viry, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pinck, L.

Biologically active transcripts from cloned cDNA of genomic grapevine fanleaf nepovirus RNAs

M. Viry, M. A. Serghini{dagger}, F. Hans, C. Ritzenthaler, M. Pinck and L. Pinck

Institut de Biologie Moléculaire des Plantes du CNRS et Université Louis Pasteur, Laboratoire de Virologie, 12 rue du Général Zimmer, 67084 Strasbourg, France

Transcripts were produced in vitro by run-off transcription from full-length cDNA of RNA1 and RNA2 of grapevine fanleaf nepovirus (GFLV; isolate F13) cloned downstream from a bacteriophage RNA polymerase promoter. These transcripts, which possess a 5' terminal cap structure and a non-viral G residue instead of the naturally occurring genome-linked viral protein (VPg), are infectious to Chenopodium quinoa protoplasts when inoculated by electroporation. Synthetic RNA1 alone replicated in protoplasts. Inoculation of C. quinoa plants with synthetic RNA1 plus RNA2 produced symptoms similar to, but weaker, than those observed in plants infected with natural GFLV 6 to 8 days post-inoculation. Co-inoculated RNA1 and RNA2 were able to replicate and spread systemically in plants but RNA1 alone produced no symptoms and was not detected in non-inoculated leaves, suggesting that virus spread requires RNA2. Analysis of the genomic RNAs in plants infected with transcripts showed that the non-viral G at their 5' ends was not retained in the progeny.

{dagger} Present address: Ibnou Zohr University, Faculty of Sciences, Agadir, Morocco.

Received 29 July 1992; accepted 1 October 1992.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. Ritzenthaler, C. Laporte, F. Gaire, P. Dunoyer, C. Schmitt, S. Duval, A. Piequet, A. M. Loudes, O. Rohfritsch, C. Stussi-Garaud, et al.
Grapevine Fanleaf Virus Replication Occurs on Endoplasmic Reticulum-Derived Membranes
J. Virol., July 29, 2002; 76(17): 8808 - 8819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
C Belin, C Schmitt, F Gaire, B Walter, G Demangeat, and L Pinck
The nine C-terminal residues of the grapevine fanleaf nepovirus movement protein are critical for systemic virus spread
J. Gen. Virol., June 1, 1999; 80(6): 1347 - 1356.
[Abstract]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1993 by the Society for General Microbiology.