J Gen Virol Try IJSEM Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 75 (1994), 1339-1344; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-75-6-1339
© 1994 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, H.
Right arrow Articles by Mannen, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, H.
Right arrow Articles by Mannen, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fujii, H.
Right arrow Articles by Mannen, K.

Protective efficacy in mice of post-exposure vaccination with vaccinia virus recombinant expressing either rabies virus glycoprotein or nucleoprotein

Hiroyuki Fujii1, Yoshiko Takita-Sonoda1, Kumato Mifune1, Kazuhiro Hirai1, Akira Nishizono1 and Kazuaki Mannen2

1 Department of Microbiology
and2 Animal Laboratory Center, Oita Medical University, Hasama-machi, Oita 879-55, Japan

Mice vaccinated intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 107 p.f.u. of a vaccinia virus recombinant expressing either the glycoprotein (rVac-G) or nucleoprotein (rVac-N) of rabies virus 3 weeks before challenge were protected against peripheral lethal infection. Similarly, by post-exposure vaccination in which mice were first infected with rabies virus and subsequently vaccinated i.p. with the recombinant, rVac-G conferred protection when given immediately following infection and up to 24 h after infection. Prior treatment of those mice with anti-CD8 monoclonal antibodies (MAb) did not significantly affect the outcome of the infection. In contrast, rVac-N failed to confer protection even with higher doses (108 p.f.u.) of the virus or even when administered by the intradermal route. Anti-nucleoprotein antibody production by these mice was not suppressed by prior rabies virus infection and the levels and the time of antibody production were similar to those of anti-glycoprotein antibody production in mice vaccinated with rVac-G after rabies virus infection. The cytotoxic T lymphocyte response was also not down-regulated by rabies virus in the mice that were given rVac-N. Possible mechanism(s) for the ineffectiveness of rVac-N by post-exposure vaccination in contrast to pre-exposure vaccination was discussed.

Received 6 July 1993; accepted 21 December 1993.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. D. Foley, J. P. McGettigan, C. A. Siler, B. Dietzschold, and M. J. Schnell
A recombinant rabies virus expressing vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein fails to protect against rabies virus infection
PNAS, December 8, 2000; (2000) 11510698.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
H. Goto, N. Minamoto, H. Ito, N. Ito, M. Sugiyama, T. Kinjo, and A. Kawai
Mapping of epitopes and structural analysis of antigenic sites in the nucleoprotein of rabies virus
J. Gen. Virol., January 1, 2000; 81(1): 119 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. D. Foley, J. P. McGettigan, C. A. Siler, B. Dietzschold, and M. J. Schnell
A recombinant rabies virus expressing vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein fails to protect against rabies virus infection
PNAS, December 19, 2000; 97(26): 14680 - 14685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1994 by the Society for General Microbiology.