J Gen Virol Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 76 (1995), 1433-1442; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-76-6-1433
© 1995 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mulder, W. A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kimman, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mulder, W. A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kimman, T. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mulder, W. A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kimman, T. G.

Role of viral proteins and concanavalin A in in vitro replication of pseudorabies virus in porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells

W. A. M. Mulder1,2,*, J. Priem1, J. M. A. Pol1 and T. G. Kimman1

1 Branch Virology, Departments of Porcine and Avian Virology and Pathology, Institute for Animal Science and Health, PO Box 365, 8200 AJ Lelystad
and2 Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Utrecht, Yalelaan 1, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands

We examined the capability of pseudorabies virus (PRV) to replicate in vitro in porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and characterized the phenotype of infected cells. In addition, we investigated whether inactivation of various PRV proteins or the expression of a foreign gene affected this replication. Finally, we studied the replication of PRV strains in concanavalin A (Con A)-stimulated lymphocytes. The replication of PRV mutants with inactivated glycoproteins gE or gG, thymidine kinase (TK), ribonucleotide reductase (RR) or US3-encoded protein kinase (PK), and the replication of PRV vector strains expressing the envelope glycoprotein E1 of hog cholera virus (HCV) were studied. By adherence of PBMC to plastic, monocytes and lymphocytes were largely separated. Infected monocytes were analysed with an immunostaining monolayer assay and infected lymphocytes were analysed with immunofluorescence staining and flow cytometry. We found that the wild-type NIA-3 virus replicated in both lymphocyte and monocyte cultures. NIA-3 infected relatively more monocytes (> 90%) than non-adherent B cells (46–65%) and T cells (17–28%); approximately equal numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were infected. Although E1 is probably involved in adsorption of HCV to host cells, the expression of E1 by PRV vector strains did not change the level of replication. Inactivation of TK and RR, but not inactivation of gE, gG or PK, severely affected the replication in both monocytes and lymphocytes. Con A stimulation of lymphocytes restored the reduced replication of the TK mutant, but not of the RR mutant. Moreover, Con A stimulation of lymphocytes reduced the replication of the wild-type NIA-3 virus. We concluded that both viral TK and RR activity are important for efficient replication of PRV in resting lymphocytes. Furthermore, Con A-stimulated lymphocytes can restore the viral TK defect and PRV replication can also be influenced by cellular metabolism.

* Author for correspondence. Fax +31 3200 42804. e-mail W.A.M.MULDER@id.agro.nl

Received 3 October 1994; accepted 16 January 1995.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 by the Society for General Microbiology.