J Gen Virol Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 77 (1996), 303-308; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-77-2-303
© 1996 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petruzziello, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mastromarino, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Petruzziello, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mastromarino, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Petruzziello, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mastromarino, P.

Pathway of rubella virus infectious entry into Vero cells

Rosanna Petruzziello1, Nicola Orsi1, Stefania Macchia1, Sabrina Rieti1, Teryl K. Frey2 and Paola Mastromarino1,*

1 Istituto Pasteur-Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Institute of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University ‘La Sapienza’, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
and2 Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30302-4010, USA

The mechanism and the kinetics of rubella virus (RV) penetration into Vero cells were studied. By using pronase or acid treatment to inactivate virus which had adsorbed to cell membrane but had not been internalized, it was found that a period of 7 h was required in order for all of the adsorbed virus to enter the host cells. Lysosomotropic agents (monensin, methylamine, ammonium chloride and chloroquine) were used to study the mechanism by which RV penetrates host cells. Virus replication was inhibited if treatment of cells with these compounds was performed for at least 9 h after infection. However, if extracellular adsorbed virions were eliminated by acid treatment following removal of the lysosomotropic compounds, RV replication was completely inhibited by treatment with these drugs for any time period after adsorption. This indicated that the prolonged period of treatment with these compounds necessary to inhibit virus replication is due to the slow rate of RV internalization. None of the compounds had any effect on infection initiated by transfection of RV RNA, confirming that these drugs were exerting their inhibitory activity at penetration. The inhibition of RV replication by lysosomotropic compounds indicates that RV penetrates host cells by the endosomal pathway.

* Author for correspondence. Fax +39 6 4991 4626.

Received 19 June 1995; accepted 6 October 1995.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
W.-P. Tzeng, J. D. Matthews, and T. K. Frey
Analysis of rubella virus capsid protein-mediated enhancement of replicon replication and mutant rescue.
J. Virol., April 1, 2006; 80(8): 3966 - 3974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
J.-Y. Lee and D. S. Bowden
Rubella Virus Replication and Links to Teratogenicity
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2000; 13(4): 571 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Garbutt, L. M. J. Law, H. Chan, and T. C. Hobman
Role of Rubella Virus Glycoprotein Domains in Assembly of Virus-Like Particles
J. Virol., May 1, 1999; 73(5): 3524 - 3533.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1996 by the Society for General Microbiology.