J Gen Virol Try IJSEM Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 8 (1970), 149-152; DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-8-2-149
© 1970 Society for General Microbiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lazier, C.
Right arrow Articles by Helleiner, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lazier, C.
Right arrow Articles by Helleiner, C. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lazier, C.
Right arrow Articles by Helleiner, C. W.

The DNA Polymerases of Vaccinia Virus-infected Animal Cells

Catherine Lazier* and C. W. Helleiner

Department of Biochemistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Increased DNA polymerase (E.C. 2.7.7.7 [EC] ) activity after infection with vaccinia virus has been found in several different host cell systems (Magee, 1962; Green, Piña & Chagoya, 1964; Jungwirth & Joklik, 1965). Various lines of evidence indicate that this increase results from the formation of a new DNA polymerase (Jungwirth & Joklik, 1965; Magee & Miller; 1967; Berns, Silverman & Weissbach, 1969).

We report here that the enzyme produced in two different infected-cell systems has similar properties, and can in each case be distinguished from the DNA polymerase of the uninfected cells. This suggests that the genetic information for the post-infection DNA polymerase is encoded in the virus genome, rather than in a normally repressed portion of the host cell genome.

L cells were grown in suspension as described by Gold & Helleiner (1964). Primary explants of chick embryo fibroblasts were prepared by the method of Paul (1965).

* Present address: Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton, England.

Received 28 March 1970; accepted 28 April 1970.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1970 by the Society for General Microbiology.