J Gen Virol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schröder, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mundt, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schröder, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mundt, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schröder, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mundt, E.
Journal of General Virology (2001), 82, 159-169.
© 2001 Society for General Microbiology


Animal: RNA Viruses

VP5 and the N terminus of VP2 are not responsible for the different pathotype of serotype I and II infectious bursal disease virus

Anja Schröder1, Adriaan A. W. M. van Loon2, Danny Goovaerts2, Jens Peter Teifke3 and Egbert Mundt1

Institute of Molecular Biology1 and Infectiology3, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institutes, Federal Research Centre for Virus Diseases of Animals, D-17498 Insel Riems, Germany
Intervet International BV, NL-5830 AA Boxmeer, The Netherlands2

Author for correspondence: Egbert Mundt. Fax +49 38351 7151. e-mail Egbert.Mundt{at}rie.bfav.de

Two serotypes have been identified in infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV), a member of the family Birnaviridae. A reverse genetics system was used for generation of chimeras in genome segment A of the two serotypes, in which the complete viral VP5 gene and 3' noncoding region (NCR), or parts thereof, were exchanged. The engineered viruses were characterized in vitro and in vivo in comparison to serotype I and II IBDV. Our results show that IBDV chimeras exhibit a different phenotype in cell culture compared to the wild-type viruses. In in vitro-cultivated bursal-derived cells, chimeric viruses infected B lymphocytes, as does serotype I IBDV. Surprisingly, serotype II virus was also able to infect in vitro-cultivated bursal cells, but these were neither B lymphocytes nor macrophages. After infection of susceptible chickens all chimeras replicated in the bursa of Fabricius (BF), and three chimeric viruses caused mild depletion of bursal cells. In contrast, after infection of chickens with a chimeric IBDV containing exchanged VP5 as well as 3'-NCR, no depletion was detectable. The serotype II strain did not replicate in the BF nor did it cause depletion of bursal cells. Thus, the origin of VP5 does not explain the different pathotype of IBDV serotype I and II.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by the Society for General Microbiology.