HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Clayton, R. F. Articles by Patel, A. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Clayton, R. F. Articles by Patel, A. H. Agricola Articles by Clayton, R. F. Articles by Patel, A. H.

Evidence for structural differences in the S domain of L in comparison with S protein of hepatitis B virus

MRC Virology Unit, Institute of Virology, Church Street, Glasgow G11 5JR, UK¹

Author for correspondence: Arvind Patel. Fax +44 141 337 2236. e-mail a.patel{at}vir.gla.ac.uk

The structures of the large (L), middle (M) and small (S) versions of the envelope proteins of hepatitis B virus remain poorly characterized due to the complex nature of their conformations. Several groups have proposed transmembrane topological models depicting the lumenally and cytosolically disposed regions of these proteins. Recently, post-translational topological changes in L have been described. However, no overall differences in the topology of the S domains of the L or M, to the S protein are predicted. In this report, we investigated a previously uncharacterized anti-S monoclonal antibody (MAb), 6B1, which recognizes a conformation-sensitive epitope in S. Unlike other anti-S MAbs tested, this MAb did not recognize its epitope in the S domain of L protein. Interestingly, however, the M protein was efficiently recognized. This unique characteristic of MAb 6B1 has allowed us to study the intracellular distribution of L and S proteins. In cells expressing both L and S, L re-localized from the endoplasmic reticulum–Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) to the membrane-associated distribution of S protein indicating that L and S interact with each other. This was confirmed by immunoprecipitation assays, which also showed that the interaction between L and S results in the secretion of L protein from cells. Overall, the ability of MAb 6B1 to selectively recognize S and M, but not L, strongly points to the existence of significant topological differences in the S domain of L. The availability of this important reagent should help further our understanding of the structure of HBV surface antigens.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X. Tian, C. Zhao, J. Ren, Z.-M. Ma, Y.-H. Xie, and Y.-M. Wen Gene-expression profiles of a hepatitis B small surface antigen-secreting cell line reveal upregulation of lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 J. Gen. Virol., November 1, 2007; 88(11): 2966 - 2976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. N. Saha, A. Tanaka, A. Jinno-Oue, N. Shimizu, K. Tamura, M. Shinagawa, J. Chiba, and H. Hoshino Formation of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Pseudotypes Bearing Surface Proteins of Hepatitis B Virus J. Virol., October 1, 2005; 79(19): 12566 - 12574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. V. L. Grgacic and D. A. Anderson St, a Truncated Envelope Protein Derived from the S Protein of Duck Hepatitis B Virus, Acts as a Chaperone for the Folding of the Large Envelope Protein J. Virol., May 1, 2005; 79(9): 5346 - 5352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]