HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Palacios, I. Articles by Fereres, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Palacios, I. Articles by Fereres, A. Agricola Articles by Palacios, I. Articles by Fereres, A.

Cauliflower mosaic virus is preferentially acquired from the phloem by its aphid vectors

Centro de Ciencias Medioambientales, CSIC, Serrano 115 dpo, 28006 Madrid, Spain¹
Station de Recherches de Pathologie Comparée, INRA-CNRS-UM II, 30380 Saint Christol-les-Alès, France²

Author for correspondence: Alberto Fereres. Fax +34 91 5640800. e-mail afereres{at}ccma.csic.es

Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) is transmitted in a non-circulative manner by aphids following the helper strategy. Helper proteins P2 and P3 act as a bridge between virions and the aphid cuticle. Electronic monitoring of aphid stylet activities (EPG technique), transmission tests and electron microscopy showed that CaMV is preferentially acquired from the phloem by its most common aphid vectors, Brevycorine brassicae and Myzus persicae. We also found that CaMV is semipersistently transmitted and that the rate of acquisition does not follow a typical bimodal curve. Instead, the virus could be acquired from non-phloem tissues at a low and fairly constant rate after one or more intracellular punctures within a few minutes, but the probability of acquisition rose significantly when aphids reached the phase of committed ingestion from the phloem. The acquisition rate of CaMV did not increase with increasing number of intracellular punctures, but the total duration of intracellular puncture was one of the variables selected by the stepwise logistic regression model used to fit the data that best explained acquisition of CaMV. Furthermore, aphids reaching the phloem faster had a higher probability of acquiring the virus. Our results support the hypothesis that multiple intracellular punctures of epidermal and mesophyll cells result in loading aphids with the CaMV-encoded aphid transmission factor (P2), and that aphids, in most cases, subsequently acquire CaMV particles during phloem sap ingestion. Consistently, immunoelectron microscopy showed that P3–virions are frequently found in the sieve element lumen, whereas P2 could not be detected.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Uzest, D. Gargani, M. Drucker, E. Hebrard, E. Garzo, T. Candresse, A. Fereres, and S. Blanc From the Cover: A protein key to plant virus transmission at the tip of the insect vector stylet PNAS, November 13, 2007; 104(46): 17959 - 17964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Khelifa, S. Journou, K. Krishnan, D. Gargani, P. Esperandieu, S. Blanc, and M. Drucker Electron-lucent inclusion bodies are structures specialized for aphid transmission of cauliflower mosaic virus J. Gen. Virol., October 1, 2007; 88(10): 2872 - 2880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Moreno, E. Hebrard, M. Uzest, S. Blanc, and A. Fereres A Single Amino Acid Position in the Helper Component of Cauliflower Mosaic Virus Can Change the Spectrum of Transmitting Vector Species J. Virol., November 1, 2005; 79(21): 13587 - 13593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Stenger, G. L. Hein, F. E. Gildow, K. M. Horken, and R. French Plant Virus HC-Pro Is a Determinant of Eriophyid Mite Transmission J. Virol., July 15, 2005; 79(14): 9054 - 9061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]