J Gen Virol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 87 (2006), 3661-3666; DOI 10.1099/vir.0.81653-0

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lunt, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Eaton, B. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lunt, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Eaton, B. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lunt, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Eaton, B. T.
© 2006 Society for General Microbiology

Cultured skin fibroblast cells derived from bluetongue virus-inoculated sheep and field-infected cattle are not a source of late and protracted recoverable virus

R. A. Lunt1, L. Melville2, N. Hunt2, S. Davis2, C. L. Rootes1, K. M. Newberry1, L. I. Pritchard1, D. Middleton1, J. Bingham1, P. W. Daniels1 and B. T. Eaton1

1 CSIRO Livestock Industries, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, PO Bag 24, Geelong, VIC 3219, Australia
2 Berrimah Veterinary Laboratories, Berrimah, Northern Territory, Australia

Correspondence
R. A. Lunt
ross.lunt{at}csiro.au

A recent hypothesis to explain the recurrence of bluetongue disease after winter seasonal absences of the vector has suggested a role for persistent infection of sheep. This report presents combined independent work from two laboratories investigating the possible recovery of Bluetongue virus (BTV) over a protracted period after infection of both sheep and cattle. Prior to infection with either cell-culture-adapted or non-culture-adapted BTV, sheep were subjected to a preliminary exposure to Culicoides sp. insects, which reportedly facilitates recovery of virus from infected sheep several months post-infection (p.i.). A series of skin biopsies at different intervals p.i. was used to establish skin fibroblast (SF) cultures from which attempts were made to detect virus by isolation and by molecular and immunological methods. Also examined was the effect on virus recovery of additional exposure to Culicoides sp. prior to skin biopsy during the post-inoculation period. A herd of cattle sentinels for surveillance of natural BTV infection in northern Australia was monitored prospectively for seroconversion. Evidence of infection initiated attempted virus recovery by establishing SF cultures. It was found that in both cattle and sheep there was not a protracted period over which BTV could be recovered from SF cultures. The data do not support a general hypothesis that BTV persists in either sheep or cattle.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 by the Society for General Microbiology.