HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fernàndez, G. Articles by Martínez, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fernàndez, G. Articles by Martínez, M. A. Agricola Articles by Fernàndez, G. Articles by Martínez, M. A.

Purifying selection of CCR5-tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants in AIDS subjects that have developed syncytium-inducing, CXCR4-tropic viruses

Fundacio irsiCaixa, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08916 Badalona, Spain

Correspondence
Miguel Angel Martínez
mmartinez{at}irsicaixa.es

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is established by virus variants that use the CCR5 co-receptor for entry (CCR5-tropic or R5 variants), whereas viruses that use CXCR4 as co-receptor (CXCR4-tropic or X4 variants) emerge during disease progression in approximately 50 % of infected subjects. X4 variants may have a higher fitness ex vivo and their detection is usually accompanied by faster T-cell depletion and the onset of AIDS in HIV-1-positive individuals. Here, the relationship between the sequence variation of the HIV-1 env V3–V5 region and positive selective pressure on R5 and X4 variants from infected subjects with CD4 T cell counts below 200 cells µl^–1 was studied. A correlation was found between genetic distance and CD4⁺ cell count at late stages of the disease. R5 variants that co-existed with X4 variants were significantly less heterogeneous than R5 variants from subjects without X4 variants (P<0·0001). Similarly, X4 variants had a significantly higher diversity than R5 variants (P<0·0001), although residues under positive selection had a similar distribution pattern in both variants. Therefore, both X4 and R5 variants were subjected to high selective pressures from the host. Furthermore, the interaction between X4 and R5 variants within the same subject resulted in a purifying selection on R5 variants, which only survived as a homogeneous virus population. These results indicate that R5 variants from X4 phenotype samples were highly homogeneous and under weakly positive selective pressures. In contrast, R5 variants from R5 phenotype samples were highly heterogeneous and subject to positive selective pressures.

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the sequences reported in this paper are AY601922 [GenBank] –AY602164 [GenBank] .

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Dabrowska, N. Kim, and A. Aldovini Tat-Induced FOXO3a Is a Key Mediator of Apoptosis in HIV-1-Infected Human CD4+ T Lymphocytes J. Immunol., December 15, 2008; 181(12): 8460 - 8477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Coetzer, R. Nedellec, J. Salkowitz, S. McLaughlin, Y. Liu, L. Heath, J. I. Mullins, and D. E. Mosier Evolution of CCR5 Use before and during Coreceptor Switching J. Virol., December 1, 2008; 82(23): 11758 - 11766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Fernandez, B. Clotet, and M. A. Martinez Fitness Landscape of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Quasispecies J. Virol., March 1, 2007; 81(5): 2485 - 2496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]