HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chesters, P. M. Articles by Nair, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chesters, P. M. Articles by Nair, V. Agricola Articles by Chesters, P. M. Articles by Nair, V.

E (XSR) element contributes to the oncogenicity of Avian leukosis virus (subgroup J)

Viral Oncogenesis Group, Division of Microbiology, Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Berkshire RG20 7NN, UK

Correspondence
Venugopal Nair
venu.gopal{at}bbsrc.ac.uk

Among the six subgroups of Avian leukosis virus (ALV) that infect chickens, subgroup J (ALV-J) was isolated from meat-type chickens where it predominantly induces myeloid leukosis (ML) and erythroblastosis (EB). The sequence of HPRS-103, the ALV-J prototype virus, shows several distinct features, one of which is the presence of a distinct hairpin stem–loop structure called the E (also called XSR) element in the 3' untranslated region. In order to determine the role of the E element in ALV-induced pathogenicity, a comparison was made of the oncogenicity of viruses derived from the provirus clones of parental and E element-deleted HPRS-103 viruses in two genetically distinct lines of birds. In line 15I birds, deletion of the E element had profound effects on virus replication in vivo, as only 55 % of birds showed evidence of infection, compared with 100 % infection by the parental virus. Furthermore, none of the line 15I birds infected with this virus developed tumours, indicating that the E element does contribute to the oncogenicity of the virus. On the other hand, deletion of the E element had only a marginal effect on the incidence of tumours in line 0 birds. These results indicate that, although the E element per se is not absolutely essential for tumour induction by this subgroup of viruses, it does contribute to oncogenicity in certain genetic lines of chicken.