HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ciota, A. T. Articles by Kramer, L. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ciota, A. T. Articles by Kramer, L. D. Agricola Articles by Ciota, A. T. Articles by Kramer, L. D.

Adaptation of two flaviviruses results in differences in genetic heterogeneity and virus adaptability

¹ The Arbovirus Laboratories, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, 5668 State Farm Road, Slingerlands, NY 12159, USA
² School of Public Health, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY, USA

Correspondence
Laura D. Kramer
ldk02{at}health.state.ny.us

West Nile virus (WNV) is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that was first introduced into the USA in the New York City area in 1999. Since its introduction, WNV has steadily increased both its host and geographical ranges. Outbreaks of the closely related flavivirus, St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV), occur in the USA periodically, but levels of activity and host range are more restricted than those of WNV. Understanding the selective pressures that drive arbovirus adaptation and evolution in their disparate mosquito and avian hosts is crucial to predicting their ability to persist and re-emerge. Here, we evaluated the in vivo phenotypes of mosquito cell-adapted WNV and SLEV. Results indicated that in vitro adaptations did not translate to in vivo adaptations for either virus, yet SLEV displayed attenuated growth in both mosquitoes and chickens, while WNV generally did not. In vitro growth analyses also indicated that WNV adaptations could be generalized to cell cultures derived from other mosquito species, while SLEV could not. Analysis of genetic diversity for passaged SLEV revealed a highly homogeneous population that differed significantly from previous results of high levels of diversity in WNV. We hypothesize that this difference in genetic diversity is directly related to the viruses' success in new and changing environments in the laboratory and that differences in a viruses' ability to produce and maintain heterogeneous populations in nature may in some instances explain the variable levels of success seen among arboviruses.

Published online ahead of print on 7 June 2007 as DOI 10.1099/vir.0.83061-0.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. T. Ciota, A. O. Lovelace, Y. Jia, L. J. Davis, D. S. Young, and L. D. Kramer Characterization of mosquito-adapted West Nile virus J. Gen. Virol., July 1, 2008; 89(7): 1633 - 1642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]