J Gen Virol Try IJSEM Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 89 (2008), 1192-1201; DOI 10.1099/vir.0.83583-0

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thermet, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cova, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thermet, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cova, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Thermet, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cova, L.

DNA vaccination in combination or not with lamivudine treatment breaks humoral immune tolerance and enhances cccDNA clearance in the duck model of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Alexandre Thermet1,2, Thierry Buronfosse1,2,3, Bettina Werle-Lapostolle1,2, Michele Chevallier4, Pierre Pradat5, Christian Trepo1,2,5, Fabien Zoulim1,2,5 and Lucyna Cova1,2

1 INSERM, Unit 871, F-69424 Lyon, France
2 Université Lyon 1, IFR62, F-69008 Lyon, France
3 Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Lyon, F-69280 Marcy l'Etoile, France
4 Pathology Department, Marcel Mérieux Laboratory, F-69007 Lyon, France
5 Hospices Civiles de Lyon, Department of Hepatology, Hotel-Dieu, F-69002 Lyon, France

Correspondence
Lucyna Cova
cova{at}lyon.inserm.fr

This study used a duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) model to evaluate whether a novel DNA vaccination protocol alone or associated with antiviral (lamivudine) treatment was able to clear the intrahepatic covalently closed, circular viral DNA (cccDNA) pool responsible for persistence of infection. DHBV carriers received DNA vaccine (on weeks 6, 10, 13, 14, 28 and 35) targeting the large envelope and/or core proteins alone or combined with lamivudine treatment (on weeks 1–8) or lamivudine monotherapy. After 10 months of follow-up, a dramatic decrease in viraemia and liver DHBV cccDNA (below 0.08 cccDNA copies per cell) was observed in 9/30 ducks (30 %) receiving DNA mono- or combination therapy, compared with 0/12 (0 %) from lamivudine monotherapy or the control groups, suggesting a significant antiviral effect of DNA immunization. However, association with the drug did not significantly improve DHBV DNA vaccine efficacy (33 % cccDNA clearance for the combination vs 27 % for DNA monotherapy), probably due to the low antiviral potency of lamivudine in the duck model. Seroconversion to anti-preS was observed in 6/9 (67 %) ducks showing cccDNA clearance, compared with 1/28 (3.6 %) without clearance, suggesting a significant correlation (P<0.001) between humoral response restoration and cccDNA elimination. Importantly, an early (weeks 10–12) drop in viraemia was observed in seroconverted animals, and virus replication did not rebound following the cessation of immunotherapy, indicating a sustained effect. This study provides the first evidence that therapeutic DNA vaccination is able to enhance hepadnaviral cccDNA clearance, which is tightly associated with a break in humoral immune tolerance. These results also highlight the importance of antiviral drug potency and an effective DNA immunization protocol for the design of therapeutic vaccines against chronic hepatitis B.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by the Society for General Microbiology.