Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of General Microbiology 90 (1975), 21-31; DOI  10.1099/00221287-90-1-21
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Corrigendum (v92,p236)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SIVENDRA, R.
Right arrow Articles by LIM, K. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SIVENDRA, R.
Right arrow Articles by LIM, K. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by SIVENDRA, R.
Right arrow Articles by LIM, K. T.

Identification of Chromobacterium violaceum: Pigmented and Non-pigmented Strains

R. SIVENDRA1, H. S. LO1 and K. T. LIM2

Veterinary Research Institute, Ipoh, Malaysia
Regional Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

ABSTRACT

Summary: The classification and, therefore, identification of Chromobacterium violaceum has been based upon its ability to produce a violet pigment. Although the organism may yield non-pigmented variants when subcultured on artificial media, the isolation of non-pigmented strains from pathological tissues or from nature had not been reported. With a method established for the identification of C. violaceum regardless of violet pigmentation, non-pigmented strains were isolated from nature. The presence of non-pigmented strains of C. violaceum in nature is of significance to taxonomy and clinical bacteriology. Pigmentation cannot be held as an essential characteristic of the definition of the genus Chromobacterium and gives credence to the suspicion of Sneath (1960, 1966) that the genus is not a natural one. Non-pigmented strains may have been isolated from clinical material but wrongly identified as belonging to other genera of non-pigmented Gram-negative bacilli and regarded as not being pathogenic.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
J. Lee, J. S. Kim, C. H. Nahm, J. W. Choi, J. Kim, S. H. Pai, K. H. Moon, K. Lee, and Y. Chong
Two Cases of Chromobacterium violaceum Infection after Injury in a Subtropical Region
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 1999; 37(6): 2068 - 2070.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
R. B. Feldman, G. A. Stern, and C. I. Hood
Chromobacterium violaceum Infection of the Eye: A Report of Two Cases
Arch Ophthalmol, May 1, 1984; 102(5): 711 - 713.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1975 Society for General Microbiology.