|
|
||||||||

1 Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Exotic Diseases Division, Private Bag X05, Onderstepoort 0110, South Africa
2 Plum Island Animal Disease Center, USDA, NAA, ARS, PO Box 848, Greenport, NY 11944, USA
Correspondence
H. G. van Rensburg
trudi{at}saturn.ovi.ac.za
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The GenBank accession number for the nucleotide sequence of the ZIM/7/83 genome reported in this paper is AF540910.
Present address: Department of Pathology, Sealy Center for Vaccine Development and WHO Collaborating Center for Tropical Diseases, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-0436, USA. ![]()
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The FMDV genome consists of a positive-strand RNA molecule of approximately 8·5 kb. This genome encodes a single translational ORF, and the product of the ORF is co- and post-translationally cleaved by viral proteinases (Sobrino et al., 2001
). The fact that the viral RNA can be made infectious in the absence of other components of the virion opened the theoretical possibility of genetically engineering new viruses from in vitro-generated RNA molecules. Zibert et al. (1990)
succeeded in the development of this technology, providing a powerful new tool for the study of FMD and the development of new methods to control the disease. Utilizing this technology, it is possible to engineer recombinant viruses containing manipulated and/or exchanged antigenic determinants (Rieder et al., 1994
; Sa-Carvalho et al., 1997
; Almeida et al., 1998
; Baranowski et al., 1998
; Beard & Mason, 2000
). Thus, it is possible that chimeric SAT viruses could be designed to retain the desirable biological properties of good vaccine strains, whilst encoding the antigens required for vaccines in different geographical localities.
In a recent study, the usefulness of a type A genome-length clone in the construction of chimeras containing the structural proteins of SAT type 2 was reported (Van Rensburg & Mason, 2002
). These studies showed that this chimera, created using a previously constructed type A12 genome-length backbone (Rieder et al., 1993
), exhibited a slower growth rate than the parental SAT2 virus, suggesting that the A12 genome-length clone is not optimal for the expression of SAT2 capsid proteins. This paper describes how we have overcome this problem by constructing a genome-length cDNA copy of a SAT2 strain. Characterization of this strain (and several derivatives) together with our previously described chimera, demonstrated that the virus recovered from the genome-length SAT2 cDNA displayed the excellent growth properties of the parental ZIM/7/83 strain, performing considerably better than our previously reported chimera (Van Rensburg & Mason, 2002
).
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis.
RNA was extracted from the tissue culture sample of ZIM/7/83 using TRIzol (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's specifications and used as a template for cDNA synthesis. Superscript Moloney murine leukaemia virus reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies) and random hexamers as primers were used for the reverse transcription reactions, which were carried out for 1 h at 42 °C.
PCR amplification, construction of genome-length cDNAs and sequencing.
A cassette-exchange strategy, based on an existing genome length cDNA of serotype A12 (pRMC35; Rieder et al., 1993
) was used in the step-wise construction of an infectious SAT2 cDNA, similar to the strategy employed by Beard & Mason (2000)
(Fig. 1
). Regions of the SAT2 cDNA were obtained through PCR amplification from cDNA using AdvanTaq DNA Polymerase (Clontech). The reaction was carried out in the presence of oligonucleotides specifically designed to contain restriction enzyme sites that would facilitate insertion into the A12 genome (Fig. 1
). The nucleotide sequence of pSAT2 was subsequently determined using selected oligonucleotides and the ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit v3.0 (Applied Biosystems), followed by resolution on an ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems). To confirm successful insertion into the A12 genome, the cloning sites of all the intermediate SAT2/A12 constructs were also verified through nucleotide sequencing.
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recovery of viable chimeras in BHK cells
These five genome-length cDNA clones, pSAT2/A12, pP1-AnSAT2, pCn-AnSAT2, pSAT2 and pA12/SAT2, together with pRMC35 and pCRM4 (A12 genetic background containing the four capsid proteins of a heparan-sulfate-binding O1Campos virus; Sa-Carvalho et al., 1997
), were used as templates for the in vitro synthesis of RNAs which were used to transfect BHK cells. Viable viruses were recovered from RNAs obtained from all five cDNAs. To verify that the resulting viruses had the expected genetic composition, RNAs extracted from each recovered virus were sequenced utilizing RT-PCR. Analyses of the sequence data obtained from the junction sites of these viral genomes revealed that all of the recovered viruses had the expected genotype (results not shown). Despite our ability to recover viruses from all of these constructs, side-by-side transfections revealed that it was more difficult to recover viruses from some of the synthetic genomes. In particular, RNA synthesized from one construct, pP1-AnSAT2, failed to produce viable virus on several occasions, although when virus was recovered it had the expected sequence.
Comparisons of the ease with which viruses were recovered from all the constructs (except for pP1-AnSAT2) are shown in Table 1
. These data showed that RNA derived from pSAT2 produced virus as early as that seen with the RNA derived from the highly tissue-culture-adapted virus (pCRM4; Sa-Carvalho et al., 1997
). The CPE observed during the sequential passaging of viruses vSAT2/A12, vCn-AnSAT2, vA12/SAT2 and vRMC35 lagged behind vCRM4 and vSAT2, but by BHK passage 4, all viruses shown in Table 1
displayed similar ability to cause CPE.
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We previously reported that vSAT2/A12, a chimeric virus with the SAT2 capsid in an A12 genome, performed poorly in BHK cells when compared to the parental ZIM/7/83 (Van Rensburg & Mason, 2002
). This finding, and studies showing that 3Cpro (which cleaves the capsid proteins of SAT2) differs significantly from type A 3Cpro (Van Rensburg et al., 2002
), lead us to propose that the poor growth properties of vSAT2/A12 were due to suboptimal processing of the SAT2 external capsid proteins by the A12 3Cpro (Van Rensburg & Mason, 2002
). However, side-by-side growth comparisons of this chimera with an infectious clone derived from a type A12 virus (vRMC35) and our genetically engineered SAT2 virus (vSAT2) indicated that the chimera grows just as well as the type A12 virus. This result suggests that, rather than being compromised by an incompatibility of various portions of its genome, the inferior growth of vSAT2/A12 relative to ZIM/7/83 may reflect the superior properties of the latter virus in cell culture.
Evaluations of the growth properties of other chimeras suggest that there is an incompatibility between different portions of the A12 and SAT2 genomes. The clearest case of this type of genetic incompatibility is revealed by the properties of the RNA derived from pP1-AnSAT2. The RNA derived from this chimeric genome did not reproducibly produce virus when transfected into cells. The resulting virus also produced plaques smaller than any of the other SAT2 capsid-expressing virus on all the cell lines investigated. This genome contains the 5' UTR, Lpro and protein 1A of type A12, with the remainder of the genome derived from ZIM/7/83. Since all of the fragments utilized in this clone produced a highly viable virus with excellent growth properties, we concluded that there were incompatibilities between the 5' UTR of A12 and the SAT2 polyprotein and 3' UTR. One of the components in this region, Lpro, was of particular interest since it was shown to differ substantially between A12 and SAT2 (Van Rensburg et al., 2002
). Lpro is, however, followed by its own cleavage site and it therefore seems unlikely that Lpro incompatibility accounts for the poor growth properties observed for vP1-AnSAT2.
Investigation of the predicted RNA structural folding of the 5' UTR of SAT2, and that of the A12 genome (Mason et al., 2003
) revealed a strong similarity in the structure, with only a few differences observed between the two genomes in the cre and previously mapped proteinRNA interaction sites for the FMDV IRES (results not shown), despite a low overall nucleotide identity (73 % for the pseudoknots and 77 % for the cre and IRES structures). However, it is unclear whether these differences could result in incompatible interactions between the 5' UTR and the non-structural proteins suggested by the poor growth of vP1-AnSAT2. Analyses of the predicted structure of the S fragment of SAT2 revealed a 37 nt deletion relative to that predicted for type A12 (results not shown). However, comparisons of vCn-AnSAT2 with vSAT2 (which differ only in their S fragments) failed to reveal any striking differences, providing further evidence of the difficulty in reaching a conclusion regarding functional interactions using predicted RNA structures.
Despite some slight differences observed with plaques on IB-RS-2 cells, reflected by small differences in growth kinetics in these cells (results not shown), the genetically derived virus, vSAT2, appears to grow as well as its parent, ZIM/7/83, in BHK cells. Since BHK is the cell line of choice for production of inactivated FMD vaccines, it appears that the cDNA used to derive vSAT2 is a good candidate for a genetic background upon which useful genetically engineered vaccine strains of FMDV can be built.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baranowski, E., Sevilla, N., Verdaguer, N., Ruiz-Jarabo, C., Beck, E. & Domingo, E. (1998). Multiple virulence determinants of foot-and-mouth disease virus in cell culture. J Virol 72, 63626372.
Bastos, A. D. S., Bertschinger, H. J., Cordel, C., van Vuuren, C. de W. J., Keet, D., Bengis, R. G., Grobler, D. G. & Thomson, G. R. (1999). Possibility of sexual transmission of foot-and-mouth disease from African buffalo to cattle. Vet Rec 145, 7779.
Bastos, A. D. S., Haydon, D. T., Forsberg, R., Knowles, N. J., Anderson, E. C., Bengis, R. G., Nel, L. H. & Thomson, G. R. (2001). Genetic heterogeneity of SAT-1 type foot-and-mouth disease viruses in southern Africa. Arch Virol 146, 15371551.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bastos, A. D. S., Haydon, D. T., Sangaré, O., Boshoff, C. I., Edrich, J. L. & Thomson, G. R. (2003). The implications of viral diversity within the SAT-2 serotype for control of foot-and-mouth disease in sub-Saharan Africa. J Gen Virol 84, 15951606.
Beard, C. W. & Mason, P. W. (2000). Genetic determinants of altered virulence of Taiwanese foot-and-mouth disease virus. J Virol 74, 987991.
Dawe, P. S., Flanagan, F. O., Madekurozwa, R. L., Sorenson, K. J., Anderson, E. C., Foggin, C. M., Ferris, N. P. & Knowles, N. J. (1994). Natural transmission of foot-and-mouth disease from African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) to cattle in a wildlife area of Zimbabwe. Vet Rec 134, 230232.[Abstract]
Esterhuysen, J. J. (1994). The antigenic variation of foot-and-mouth disease viruses and its significance in the epidemiology of the disease in Southern Africa. MSc thesis. University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Fry, E., Lea, S. M., Jackson, T. & 7 other authors (1999). The structure and function of a foot-and-mouth disease virus-oligosaccharide receptor complex. EMBO J 18, 543554.[CrossRef][Medline]
Harris, T. J. R. (1980). Comparison of the nucleotide sequences at the 5' end of RNAs from nine aphthoviruses, including representatives of the seven serotypes. J Virol 36, 659664.
Hunter, P. (1998). Vaccination as a means of control of foot-and-mouth disease in sub-Saharan Africa. Vaccine 16, 261264.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jackson, T., King, A. M. Q., Stuart, D. I. & Fry, E. (2003). Structure and receptor binding. Virus Res 91, 3346.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mason, P. W., Baxt, B., Brown, F., Harber, J., Murdin, A. & Wimmer, E. (1993). Antibody-complexed foot-and-mouth disease virus, but not poliovirus, can infect normally insusceptible cells via the Fc receptor. Virology 192, 568577.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mason, P. W., Bezborodova, S. V. & Henry, T. M. (2002). Identification and characterization of a cis-acting replication element (cre) adjacent to the internal ribosomal entry site of foot-and-mouth disease virus. J Virol 76, 96869694.
Mason, P. W., Grubman, M. J. & Baxt, B. (2003). Molecular basis of pathogenesis of FMDV. Virus Res 91, 932.[CrossRef][Medline]
Neff, S., Sa-Carvalho, D., Rieder, E., Mason, P. W., Blystone, S. D., Brown, E. J. & Baxt, B. (1998). Foot-and-mouth disease virus virulent for cattle utilizes the integrin
v
3 as its receptor. J Virol 72, 35873594.
Rieder, E., Bunch, T., Brown, F. & Mason, P. W. (1993). Genetically engineered foot-and-mouth disease viruses with poly(C) tracts of two nucleotides are virulent in mice. J Virol 67, 51395145.
Rieder, E., Baxt, B., Lubroth, J. & Mason, P. W. (1994). Vaccines prepared from chimeras of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) induce neutralizing antibodies and protective immunity to multiple serotypes of FMDV. J Virol 68, 70927098.
Sa-Carvalho, D., Rieder, E., Baxt, B., Rodarte, R., Tanuri, T. & Mason, P. W. (1997). Tissue culture adaptation of foot-and-mouth disease viruses that bind to heparin and are attenuated in cattle. J Virol 71, 51155123.[Abstract]
Sobrino, F., Sáiz, M., Jiménez-Clavero, M. A., Núñez, J. I., Rosas, M. F., Baranowski, E. & Ley, V. (2001). Foot-and-mouth disease virus: a long known virus, but a current threat. Vet Res 32, 130.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thomson, G. R., Vosloo, W. & Bastos, A. D. S. (2003). Foot and mouth disease in wildlife. Virus Res 91, 145161.[CrossRef][Medline]
Van Rensburg, H. G. & Nel, L. H. (1999). Characterization of the structural-protein-coding region of SAT2 type foot-and-mouth disease virus. Virus Genes 19, 229233.[CrossRef][Medline]
Van Rensburg, H. G. & Mason, P. W. (2002). Construction and evaluation of a recombinant foot-and-mouth disease virus: implications for inactivated vaccine production. Ann N Y Acad Sci 969, 8387.[Medline]
Van Rensburg, H., Haydon, D., Joubert, F., Bastos, A., Heath, L. & Nel, L. (2002). Genetic heterogeneity in the foot-and-mouth disease virus Leader and 3C proteinases. Gene 289, 1929.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vosloo, W., Kirkbride, E., Bengis, R. G., Keet, A. F. & Thomson, G. R. (1995). Genome variation in the SAT types of foot-and-mouth disease viruses prevalent in buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in the Kruger National Park and other regions of southern Africa, 19861993. Epidemiol Infect 114, 203218.[Medline]
Zibert, A., Maass, G., Strebel, K., Falk, M. M. & Beck, E. (1990). Infectious foot-and-mouth disease virus derived from a cloned full-length cDNA. J Virol 64, 24672473.
Received 15 July 2003;
accepted 23 September 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Chang, H. Zheng, Y. Shang, Y. Jin, G. Wang, X. Shen, and X. Liu Recovery of infectious foot-and-mouth disease virus from full-length genomic cDNA clones using an RNA polymerase I system Acta Biochim Biophys Sin, November 12, 2009; (2009) gmp093v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Heath, E. van der Walt, A. Varsani, and D. P. Martin Recombination Patterns in Aphthoviruses Mirror Those Found in Other Picornaviruses J. Virol., December 1, 2006; 80(23): 11827 - 11832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |