| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 The Eye Institute, University of California at Irvine, School of Medicine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
2 Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Nebraska Center for Virology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68503, USA
3 MRC Virology Unit, Institute of Virology, Church Street, Glasgow G11 5JR, UK
4 Department of Virology, USAMC-AFRIMS, APO, AP 96546, Bangkok, Thailand
5 Department of Tropical Medicine, Medical Microbiology and Pharmacology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
6 Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
Correspondence
Guey Chuen Perng
pernggc{at}afrims.org
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
; Wildy, 1973). A wide range of clinical manifestations occur as a result of HSV-1 infections, from mild uncomplicated mucocutaneous infections to life-threatening encephalitis (Whitley & Roizman, 2001). Over 80 % of the population is sero-positive for HSV-1 (Nahmias et al., 1990). The route and time of viral transmission are not clear but they appear to be associated with close human contact at a very young age (Roizman & Whitley, 2001).
During the acute infection, HSV-1 travels by retrograde axonal transport to the sensory ganglia where brief virus replication occurs. Subsequently, one of two mutually exclusive scenarios can take place, either neuronal destruction results from virus replication or neuronal survival from which viral latency is established. The latent virus stays in the individual for life (Stevens & Cook, 1971) and the virus reactivates as the result of external stimuli, such as emotional stress, tissue damage, systemic and/or topical steroid therapy, and UV exposure (Whitley, 2001). Reactivated virus travels down the sensory nerve axon and spreads to and infects the peripheral mucosal epithelium and, in some cases, the eye. In some individuals reactivation causes a recurrent manifestation of infection and the development of herpes stromal keratitis (HSK). Generally, the pattern of clinical disease resulting from primary or recurrent HSV-1 infection is mild or asymptomatic. When clinical symptoms do occur, they range from the mild but common fever blister on the lip to more severe eye infections resulting in visual loss, and to devastating but rare infections of the central nervous system (Roizman & Sears, 1996).
Ocular infections with HSV-1 can induce HSK that is clinically apparent in only 1–6 % of patients (Pavan-Langston, 2000) and most episodes of HSK are associated with reactivation of HSV-1 infection (Shimeld et al., 2001). The recurrence is shown as the epithelial keratitis with typical dendritic or geographical ulcers. The other manifestation of recurrence of herpetic disease is immune stromal keratitis (Holland & Schwartz, 1999), which is believed to result from an immune response to the resident herpes virus antigens. Stromal keratitis is characterized by cellular infiltration and neovascularization; this rarely leads to necrotizing stromal keratitis, clinically showing necrosis, ulceration and severe cellular infiltration with epithelial defect. These clinical manifestations vary but affect the patient's vision. Indeed, herpetic keratitis is still the most common infectious cause of corneal opacity that leads to blindness in the developed world, in spite of the availability of anti-HSV drugs. The actual underlying mechanisms by which corneal scarring develops are unclear. It is assumed that viral antigens trigger an immunopathological response that leads to tissue damage in the corneal stroma (Deshpande et al., 2004; Streilein et al., 1997). Several mechanisms of immunopathology have been suggested. First, viral antigens and specific antibody complexes may be trapped in the stromal layer of the cornea and trigger inflammatory responses, in which complement and polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) play a pivotal role (Deshpande et al., 2002, 2004; Streilein et al., 1997). Second, molecular mimicry triggered by HSV-1, which induces antiviral immunity, may lead to immune responses against self-antigens or autoimmune responses (Avery et al., 1995; Zhao et al., 1998) leading to bystander effects (Deshpande et al., 2001). Third, corneal latency in which viral DNA persists in corneas causing persistent infection has also been proposed (Cantin et al., 1992; Polcicova et al., 2005). Perhaps, it is difficult to detect viral antigens using antibodies in HSK corneas. Thus, it remains unclear which, if any, viral protein(s) is involved in HSK.
We recently demonstrated by Western blot analysis and immunocytochemistry that the HSV-1 immediate-early protein ICP0 rapidly diffuses out of infected rabbit corneas and that ICP0 could be diffusely localized to the anterior stroma of infected corneas (Naito et al., 2005). To investigate further the presence of ICP0 in the anterior stroma of infected rabbit corneas, confocal microscopy images were taken from ex vivo rabbit corneas infected with an HSV-1 ICP0–EYFP, a previously described recombinant virus that expresses ICP0 as a fusion protein with enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) (Everett et al., 2003). Our data confirm that HSV-1 ICP0 is in the stromal layer of infected rabbit corneas during the course of acute infection. In addition, ICP0–EYFP is localized to punctate deposits within the cytoplasm and/or perinuclear region of rabbit corneal fibroblasts or keratocytes.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
). Briefly, corneal epithelium was removed using a no. 10 surgical blade (Feather Safety Razor). After wiping with 70 % isopropyl alcohol, corneas were excised. The corneal endothelium was removed with a sterile cotton-tipped applicator. Corneas were digested in sterile 2.0 mg collagenase (Gibco Invitrogen) ml–1 and 0.5 mg hyaluronidase (Worthington) ml–1 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Invitrogen) overnight at 37 °C. After digestion, RKs were plated in serum-free medium (RPMI vitamin mix and glutathione, non-essential amino acids, pyruvic acid, 1 % glutamine, 10 U penicillin, 10 µg streptomycin ml–1 and 25 µg fungizone ml–1 in DMEM) at 2.5x104 cells per cm2 onto 3 cm glass-bottomed dishes coated with 1.5 mg collagen (Cohesion; Invitrogen) ml–1 for morphological observation or at 5.0x104 cells per cm2 onto 10 cm plates for Western blot analysis. RKs were also activated to corneal fibroblasts (RCF) by culturing with 10 % fetal bovine serum prior to evaluation. Rabbit skin (RS) cells were grown in Eagle's minimal essential medium supplemented with 5 % fetal bovine serum as described previously (Perng et al., 1994).
Animals.
Eight- to 10-week-old New Zealand white male rabbits (Irish Farms) were used. Rabbits were treated in accordance with Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, American Association for Laboratory Animal Care and National Institute of Health guidelines.
HSV infection.
HSV-1 ICP0–EYFP, a derivative of wild-type (wt) HSV-1 strain 17+, has been characterized previously (Everett et al., 2003, 2004). wt HSV-1 McKrae and Glasgow strain 17+ were triple plaque purified, passaged only one or two times and titrated in RS cells prior to use (Perng et al., 1994). RSs, RKs and RCFs in culture were infected with 0.1, 1.0 and 10.0 m.o.i. of ICP0–EYFP. Rabbits were bilaterally infected after scarification by placing, as eye drops, 2x105 p.f.u. of virus into the conjunctival cul-de-sac, closing the eyes and rubbing the lid gently against the eye for 30 s as described previously (Perng et al., 1994).
Tissue staining.
Three rabbits were euthanized with pentobarbital (100 mg kg–1) at indicated times and corneas fixed by anterior chamber perfusion with 2 % paraformaldehyde in PBS. Corneas were excised and observed under a fluorescent microscope to identify ICP0–EYFP-positive lesions. Corneas were then dissected into smaller corneal blocks (1–1.5 mm), washed in PBS and then further stained overnight at 4 °C with phalloidin (Alexa Flour 633 phalloidin; Molecular Probes) or 5 µm SYTO 59 (Molecular Probes) in 50 % TD buffer (0.5 % DMSO, 0.5 % Triton X, 2.5 % dextran 40 in PBS, pH 7.4) to identify actin cytoskeleton or nuclei, respectively. After staining, samples were mounted with 1 : 1 glycerol/PBS on coverslips.
ICP0, cytoskeleton and nuclei imaging.
Samples were mounted on a microscope (Axiovert 100; Zeiss) and observed by laser confocal microscopy (LSM 510 META; Zeiss). In order to detect the localization of ICP0–EYFP in corneas, the entire tissue block was scanned from the endothelial side to the epithelial side using a x20 objective lens (Zeiss) at 2 µm steps. To localize better the ICP0–EYFP to corneal cells, the anterior, subepithelial region of the cornea was scanned using a x40 oil immersion objective lens (Zeiss) at 1 µm steps. The ICP0–EYFP fusion protein was excited by a 514 nm argon laser line and the emission was detected using a 535–590 nm band-pass filter. Actin or nuclei were imaged by excitation with the 633 nm helium–neon laser and the emission was collected with a 650 nm long-pass filter.
Image analysis.
Scanned images of ICP0–EYFP, actin or nuclei were three-dimensionally reconstructed using LSM Examiner software (Zeiss). From each three-dimensional dataset, four 10 µm wide x–z slices were cut at equally spaced regions through the dataset. Cut regions were then rotated and maximum intensity projections generated along the z–y plane. For each projection, the corneal thickness and depth of ICP0–EFYP fluorescence was measured using MetaView image processing software (Universal Imaging).
Western blot analysis.
Protein samples in gel sample buffer [2 % (v/v) SDS, 50 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 3 % (v/v) sucrose, 5 % 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 % bromophenol blue] were subjected to electrophoresis in 10 % bisacrylamide gels, transferred to PVDF membranes, blocked for 2 h with 5 % (v/v) non-fat dried milk in PBS and reacted with the appropriate primary antibody, which was diluted in PBS with 1 % BSA and 0.05 % Tween 20, overnight at 4 °C. The appropriate secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase was diluted 1 : 5000 in PBS with 1 % BSA and 0.05 % Tween 20 and was reacted to the membrane for 1 h at room temperature. The blot was rinsed in PBS with 1 % BSA and 0.05 % Tween 20. Bound antibody was detected by SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce) and visualized by autoradiography. For reprobing the membrane, blots were stripped by incubating with stripping buffer (PBS with 7 µl 2-mercaptoethanol ml–1 and 2 % SDS) for 30 min at room temperature with constant agitation and then reprobed.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
, 2004). However, the biological properties of ICP0–EYFP have not been examined in primary cultures prepared from cornea. Primary rabbit corneal fibroblast and keratocyte cells were isolated and infected with 0.1 p.f.u. per cell of McKrae, 17+ or ICP0–EYFP for 24 h. Cell lysates were analysed by Western blot analysis using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against glycoprotein B (gB) or ICP0. The ICP0–EYFP fusion protein was expressed in both primary, serum-free cultured RK (primary RKs) and serum cultured RCF (primary rabbit corneal fibroblast) (Fig. 1a and b). The increased molecular mass of ICP0–EYFP compared with that of normal ICP0 expressed by McKrae and 17+ was in accordance with a previous report (Everett et al., 2003). The viral gB was expressed from both RCF and RK cells as well (Fig. 1a, b). The specificity of ICP0–EYFP fusion protein was demonstrated in cell lyaste from RK, probing with an anti-GFP antibody (Fig. 1c). To ensure the integrity of ICP0–EYFP fusion protein, membranes were left for longer exposures and no smaller bands were observed (data not shown). Therefore, the ICP0–EYFP fusion protein does not undergo detectable processing, confirming that the fluorescence signal detected in later experiments must be derived from the intact fusion protein, rather than an EYFP fragment. To determine the loading quantities of the protein from individual lysates, mAb to GAPDH was used as a marker (Fig. 1).
|
). The ICP0–EYFP signal was localized to granular deposits mainly within the cytoplasm, and it co-localized with the red fluorescent signal generated by staining for ICP0 with a mAb (Fig. 2, upper panel). The granular deposits detected in the cytoplasm of infected keratocytes were also observed in strain 17+ and McKrae-infected keratocytes (Fig. 2, middle and lower panels, respectively). Thus, the biological properties of the ICP0–EYFP in primary keratocytes are similar to those of the parental virus, 17+ or wt McKrae.
|
). A typical cluster of fused epithelial cells expressing ICP0–EYFP (pseudo-coloured green) was detected (Fig. 3a, b). An ICP0–EYFP signal was also observed along the scarified surface of the infected cornea (Fig. 3c). It is common practice to scarify the surface of corneas with a fine needle to enhance the infectivity of the wt HSV-1 strain 17+, the parent of ICP0–EYFP. This scarification results in cutting of the corneal epithelium and, at times, incision of the anterior corneal stroma. This leads to migration of epithelium into the cut region of the stroma and direct contact with stromal keratocytes. In z–y projections, extension of infected epithelial cells that express ICP0–EYFP into the stroma were detected (Fig. 3d).
|
). However, an independent report concluded that no viral antigens were detected in the stroma of acutely infected mouse corneas (Polcicova et al., 2005). To further strengthen our findings, rabbits were ocularly infected with ICP0–EYFP and corneas were collected at different days after infection. The ICP0–EYFP signal was detected in infected corneas using confocal microscopy as described in Methods (Fig. 4a). The ICP0–EYFP signal was hardly visible in the epithelial and stromal layers 1 day after infection (Fig. 4a, day 1). A much more intense signal was detected in the anterior stromal layer of infected cornea 3 days after infection (Fig. 4a, day 3) and the intensity of the ICP0–EYFP signal was reduced 7 days after infection (Fig. 4a, day 7). By 14 days after infection, the ICP0–EYFP signal mainly localized underneath epithelial cells (Fig. 4a, day 14). By 28 days after infection, the ICP0–EYFP signal was hardly detectable (data not shown). ICP0–EYFP was localized primarily to corneal keratocytes from day 3 to 14. A z–y projection from infected cornea 10 days after infection is shown in Fig. 4(b).
|
), which were similar to those detected in cultured primary keratocytes infected with ICP0–EYFP (Fig. 2
). In this particular infected cornea, the ICP0–EYFP signal could be seen up to 78 µm below the basal epithelial cells (Fig. 5a, 78/89). A cartoon drawing to demonstrate the depth of the scan section is shown in Fig. 5(b). Very few keratocytes were observed right underneath the layer of epithelium. At the centre, most obviously from 12 to 43 µm, the majority of keratocytes were gone and a scratched lesion was seen in the stromal layer. With this approach, we were able to calculate the depth of the ICP0–EYFP signal distributed in the stromal layer of the infected cornea (Table 1). The overall thickness of the stroma increased gradually from days 3 to 14 after infection and decreased by 28 days after infection. The maximum depth of the ICP0–EYFP signal remained constant from days 3 to 14, achieving 16–17 % depth. The depth of the ICP0–EYFP signal, 7 days after infection, was slightly less (10 %) than that detected at days 3 and 10, which may be due to either experimental error or a second wave of virus replication within the stroma. The finding that a maximum depth of infection was achieved as early as 3 days after exposure suggested that infection of keratocytes originates from epithelial virus rather than from lateral and axial spread of virus from adjacent keratocytes.
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
). The clinical manifestations range from mild blurry vision, photophobia and watery eyes to, in the worst cases, a devastatingly scarred cornea. These clinical symptoms are primarily due to recurrent keratitis within the stromal layer of the cornea. In addition, it is generally thought that HSK is the result of an immune response directed against one or more viral proteins. Although the presence of HSV-1 antigens can be sporadically found in stroma or keratocytes using immunohistochemical analysis and probing with anti-HSV-1 polyclonal antibodies in HSK corneas (Anaka & Kimura, 1967; Easty et al., 1987; Holbach et al., 1991; Kaye et al., 2000; Koelle et al., 2000; Meyers-Elliott et al., 1980; Robertson et al., 1984; Verjans et al., 2000), detecting specific viral antigens may be more difficult using immunohistochemical analysis in HSK corneas. Thus, it remains unclear which, if any, viral protein(s) is expressed in the eyes of patients with HSK.
The mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of corneal scarring is still an enigma in spite of intense study into this disease. A role for both a T-helper (Th)1 and a Th2 response has been suggested (Deshpande et al., 2002; Gangappa et al., 2000), although this viral antigen hypothesis has been hard to prove (Banerjee et al., 2002). In addition, cytotoxic CD8+ T cells involved in an autoimmune response against corneal autoantigens (Avery et al., 1995; Zhao et al., 1998), CD4+ T-cell-mediated inflammatory reaction (Deshpande et al., 2001) and CpG induced immune response have also been proposed to induce HSK (Cantin et al., 1992; Zheng et al., 2002). A recent report has concluded that the ability of HSV to persist in the cornea may lead to HSK in mice (Polcicova et al., 2005). In this previous study, a mutant HSV-1 strain was used that exhibits diminished neuronal transport. Since these previous studies were performed in mice, in which in vivo reactivation from latency does not frequently occur (Feldman et al., 2002), it is not clear how frequent reactivation from latency influences these results. We recently reported that soluble ICP0 is found in the tears of infected rabbit eyes, a model in which high levels of spontaneous reactivation from latency occur (Barsam et al., 2005), and that a diffuse staining pattern for ICP0 can be detected by immunohistochemistry in the anterior stromal layer of acutely infected corneas (Naito et al., 2005). To further confirm and extend our finding that ICP0 is present in the stromal layer of infected cornea, confocal microscopy was used to scan the ex vivo rabbit corneas infected with virus ICP0–EYFP, a well-characterized recombinant virus that expresses ICP0 fused to EYFP (Everett et al., 2003).
The biological properties of ICP0–EYFP in primary corneal fibroblast cells and keratocytes were similar to those of the parental 17+ or wt McKrae HSV-1 strains. A striking finding in this study was that ICP0 appeared to be localized predominantly in the cytoplasmic and perinuclear region rather than in the nucleus of infected keratocytes. This phenomenon may be related to the rate and efficiency of ICP0 translocation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, a phenomenon that occurs at later stages of infection and which is cell-type specific (Advani et al., 2001; Elliott et al., 2005; Lopez et al., 2001). Alternatively, it may be due to lower amounts of protein kinase G in keratocytes, which may lead to inefficient phosphorylation of ICP0. Interestingly, the degree of ICP0 phosphorylation affects the organelle localization of ICP0 in infected cells (Advani et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2000; Davido et al., 2005). Furthermore, we observed that lower levels of protein kinase G were clearly detected in keratocytes compared to corneal fibroblast cultures. In contrast, there was no visible difference between p70S6K kinase and protein kinase C in the respective cells (data not shown). This may also be due to increased deposition of ICP0 in primary keratocytes and stromal fibroblasts within the cytoplasm and adjacent perinuclear envelope, which may mask detection of intranuclear ICP0. Additional studies will be necessary to determine the factors that regulate the subcellular localization of ICP0 in primary cells.
In infected animals, the ICP0–EYFP signal could be seen within epithelial cells of the infected cornea as early as 1 day after infection and it gradually penetrated into the stromal layer of the cornea by day 3. The depth distribution of the ICP0–EYFP signal ranged from 10 to 20 % of the total stromal depth (Table 1). Furthermore, ICP0 was mainly in the anterior stromal layer of infected corneas throughout the course of acute viral infection. Coincidentally, anterior corneal scarring caused by epithelial keratitis mainly occurs in the anterior third of the stroma (Pepose, 1991; Pepose et al., 1996). Our data and these clinical manifestations indicate that infectious herpes virus invades the corneal stroma at the sites of epithelial keratitis. However, it is unclear whether the presence of ICP0 in the stromal layer of infected cornea associates with the development of corneal scarring. Taken together, these results suggest that ICP0 may be an important HSV-1 protein present in HSK cornea, although the presence of other viral antigens cannot be excluded. Thus, if HSK is due to an immune response to an HSV-1 antigen, ICP0 is a likely candidate. However, this does not exclude the possibility that small amounts of other viral proteins that are undectectable by Western blot assays can trigger an immune response that contributes to HSK.
It has been shown that reactivation can occur in latently infected rabbits (Perng et al., 1994; Barsam et al., 2005). Whether the ICP0–EYFP signal can be detected in the stromal layer of rabbit corneas during latent infection with ICP0–EYFP virus or during reactivation from latency is currently under investigation.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that using ex vivo confocal microscopy the ICP0 protein was expressed in the stromal layer of the cornea of acutely infected rabbits.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Anaka, N. & Kimura, S. J. (1967). Localization of herpes simplex antigen and virus in the corneal stroma of experimental herpetic keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol 78, 68–73.[Medline]
Avery, A. C., Zhao, Z. S., Rodriguez, A., Bikoff, E. K., Soheilian, M., Foster, C. S. & Cantor, H. (1995). Resistance to herpes stromal keratitis conferred by an IgG2a-derived peptide. Nature 376, 431–434.[CrossRef][Medline]
Banerjee, K., Deshpande, S., Zheng, M., Kumaraguru, U., Schoenberger, S. P. & Rouse, B. T. (2002). Herpetic stromal keratitis in the absence of viral antigen recognition. Cell Immunol 219, 108–118.[CrossRef][Medline]
Barsam, C. A., Brick, D. J., Jones, C., Wechsler, S. L. & Perng, G. C. (2005). A viral model for corneal scarring and neovascularization following ocular infection of rabbits with a herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) mutant. Cornea 24, 460–466.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cantin, E., Chen, J., Willey, D. E., Taylor, J. L. & O'Brien, W. J. (1992). Persistence of herpes simplex virus DNA in rabbit corneal cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33, 2470–2475.
Chen, X., Li, J., Mata, M., Goss, J., Wolfe, D., Glorioso, J. C. & Fink, D. J. (2000). Herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP0 protein does not accumulate in the nucleus of primary neurons in culture. J Virol 74, 10132–10141.
Cumston, C. (1926). The history of herpes from the earliest times to the nineteenth centry. Ann Med Hist 8, 284–291.
Davido, D. J., von Zagorski, W. F., Lane, W. S. & Schaffer, P. A. (2005). Phosphorylation site mutations affect herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP0 function. J Virol 79, 1232–1243.
Deshpande, S., Zheng, M., Lee, S., Banerjee, K., Gangappa, S., Kumaraguru, U. & Rouse, B. T. (2001). Bystander activation involving T lymphocytes in herpetic stromal keratitis. J Immunol 167, 2902–2910.
Deshpande, S. P., Zheng, M., Lee, S. & Rouse, B. T. (2002). Mechanisms of pathogenesis in herpetic immunoinflammatory ocular lesions. Vet Microbiol 86, 17–26.[CrossRef][Medline]
Deshpande, S., Banerjee, K., Biswas, P. S. & Rouse, B. T. (2004). Herpetic eye disease: immunopathogenesis and therapeutic measures. Expert Rev Mol Med 2004, 1–14.[Medline]
Easty, D. L., Shimeld, C., Claoue, C. M. & Menage, M. (1987). Herpes simplex virus isolation in chronic stromal keratitis: human and laboratory studies. Curr Eye Res 6, 69–74.[Medline]
Elliott, G., Hafezi, W., Whiteley, A. & Bernard, E. (2005). Deletion of the herpes simplex virus VP22-encoding gene (UL49) alters the expression, localization, and virion incorporation of ICP0. J Virol 79, 9735–9745.
Everett, R. D., Sourvinos, G. & Orr, A. (2003). Recruitment of herpes simplex virus type 1 transcriptional regulatory protein ICP4 into foci juxtaposed to ND10 in live, infected cells. J Virol 77, 3680–3689.
Everett, R. D., Sourvinos, G., Leiper, C., Clements, J. B. & Orr, A. (2004). Formation of nuclear foci of the herpes simplex virus type 1 regulatory protein ICP4 at early times of infection: localization, dynamics, recruitment of ICP27, and evidence for the de novo induction of ND10-like complexes. J Virol 78, 1903–1917.
Feldman, L. T., Ellison, A. R., Voytek, C. C., Yang, L., Krause, P. & Margolis, T. P. (2002). Spontaneous molecular reactivation of herpes simplex virus type 1 latency in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 978–983.
Gangappa, S., Deshpande, S. P. & Rouse, B. T. (2000). Bystander activation of CD4+ T cells accounts for herpetic ocular lesions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41, 453–459.
Holbach, L. M., Font, R. L. & Wilhelmus, K. R. (1991). Recurrent herpes simplex keratitis with concurrent epithelial and stromal involvement. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural observations. Arch Ophthalmol 109, 692–695.[Abstract]
Holland, E. J. & Schwartz, G. S. (1999). Classification of herpes simplex virus keratitis. Cornea 18, 144–154.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jester, J. V., Barry-Lane, P. A., Cavanagh, H. D. & Petroll, W. M. (1996). Induction of alpha-smooth muscle actin expression and myofibroblast transformation in cultured corneal keratocytes. Cornea 15, 505–516.[Medline]
Kaye, S. B., Baker, K., Bonshek, R., Maseruka, H., Grinfeld, E., Tullo, A., Easty, D. L. & Hart, C. A. (2000). Human herpesviruses in the cornea. Br J Ophthalmol 84, 563–571.
Koelle, D. M., Reymond, S. N., Chen, H. & 7 other authors (2000). Tegument-specific, virus-reactive CD4 T cells localize to the cornea in herpes simplex virus interstitial keratitis in humans. J Virol 74, 10930–10938.
Liesegang, T. J. (2001). Herpes simplex virus epidemiology and ocular importance. Cornea 20, 1–13.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lopez, P., Van Sant, C. & Roizman, B. (2001). Requirements for the nuclear-cytoplasmic translocation of infected-cell protein 0 of herpes simplex virus 1. J Virol 75, 3832–3840.
Meyers-Elliott, R. H., Pettit, T. H. & Maxwell, W. A. (1980). Viral antigens in the immune ring of herpes simplex stromal keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol 98, 897–904.[Abstract]
Nahmias, A. J., Lee, F. K. & Beckman-Nahmias, S. (1990). Sero-epidemiological and -sociological patterns of herpes simplex virus infection in the world. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 69, 19–36.
Naito, J., Mott, K. R., Osorio, N., Jin, L. & Perng, G. C. (2005). Herpes simplex virus type 1 immediate-early protein ICP0 diffuses out of infected rabbit corneas. J Gen Virol 86, 2979–2988.
Pavan-Langston, D. (2000). Herpes simplex of the ocular anterior segment. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis 20, 298–324.[Medline]
Pepose, J. S. (1991). Herpes simplex keratitis: role of viral infection versus immune response. Surv Ophthalmol 35, 345–352.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pepose, J. S. L. D., Stuart, P. M. & Easty, E. L. (1996). Herpes simplex virus: anterior segment of the eye. In Ocular Infection and Immunity, pp. 905–932. Edited by J. S. Pepose & K. R. Wilhelmus. St Louis: Mosby.
Perng, G. C., Dunkel, E. C., Geary, P. A., Slanina, S. M., Ghiasi, H., Kaiwar, R., Nesburn, A. B. & Wechsler, S. L. (1994). The latency-associated transcript gene of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is required for efficient in vivo spontaneous reactivation of HSV-1 from latency. J Virol 68, 8045–8055.
Polcicova, K., Biswas, P. S., Banerjee, K., Wisner, T. W., Rouse, B. T. & Johnson, D. C. (2005). Herpes keratitis in the absence of anterograde transport of virus from sensory ganglia to the cornea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 11462–11467.
Robertson, I., Weiner, J. M. & Finkelstein, E. (1984). Untreated Hansen's disease of the eye: a clinicopathological report. Aust J Ophthalmol 12, 335–339.[Medline]
Roizman, B. & Sears, A. E. (1996). Herpes simplex viruses and their replication. In Fields Virology, 3rd edn, pp. 2231–2295. Edited by B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe & P. M. Howley. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven.
Roizman, B. & Whitley, R. J. (2001). The nine ages of herpes simplex virus. Herpes 8, 23–27.[Medline]
Shimeld, C., Efstathiou, S. & Hill, T. (2001). Tracking the spread of a lacZ-tagged herpes simplex virus type 1 between the eye and the nervous system of the mouse: comparison of primary and recurrent infection. J Virol 75, 5252–5262.
Stevens, J. G. & Cook, M. L. (1971). Latent herpes simplex virus in spinal ganglia of mice. Science 173, 843–845.
Streilein, J. W., Dana, M. R. & Ksander, B. R. (1997). Immunity causing blindness: five different paths to herpes stromal keratitis. Immunol Today 18, 443–449.[CrossRef][Medline]
Verjans, G. M., Remeijer, L., Mooy, C. M. & Osterhaus, A. D. (2000). Herpes simplex virus-specific T cells infiltrate the cornea of patients with herpetic stromal keratitis: no evidence for autoreactive T cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41, 2607–2612.
Whitley, R. J. (2001). Herpes simplex viruses. In Fields Virology, 4th edn, pp. 2461–2509. Edited by D. K. P. Howley. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Whitley, R. J. & Roizman, B. (2001). Herpes simplex virus infections. Lancet 357, 1513–1518.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wildy, P. (1973). Herpes history and classification. In The Herpesviruses, pp. 1–25. Edited by A. Kaplan. New York: Academic Press.
Zhao, Z. S., Granucci, F., Yeh, L., Schaffer, P. A. & Cantor, H. (1998). Molecular mimicry by herpes simplex virus-type 1: autoimmune disease after viral infection. Science 279, 1344–1347.
Zheng, M., Klinman, D. M., Gierynska, M. & Rouse, B. T. (2002). DNA containing CpG motifs induces angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 8944–8949.
Received 28 March 2006;
accepted 22 May 2006.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Kummer, N. M. Turza, P. Muhl-Zurbes, M. Lechmann, C. Boutell, R. S. Coffin, R. D. Everett, A. Steinkasserer, and A. T. Prechtel Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Induces CD83 Degradation in Mature Dendritic Cells with Immediate-Early Kinetics via the Cellular Proteasome J. Virol., June 15, 2007; 81(12): 6326 - 6338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |
