J Gen Virol Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 87 (2006), 2885-2890; DOI 10.1099/vir.0.81906-0

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rickinson, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bell, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rickinson, A. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bell, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rickinson, A. B.
© 2006 Society for General Microbiology

Short Communication

Analysis of Epstein–Barr virus latent gene expression in endemic Burkitt's lymphoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumour cells by using quantitative real-time PCR assays

Andrew I. Bell1, Katherine Groves1, Gemma L. Kelly1, Debbie Croom-Carter1, Edwin Hui2, Anthony T. C. Chan2 and Alan B. Rickinson1

1 Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
2 Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong

Correspondence
Andrew I. Bell
a.i.bell{at}bham.ac.uk


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
MAIN TEXT
REFERENCES
 
Studies of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-positive cell lines have identified several forms of virus latency, but the patterns of virus gene expression in EBV-positive tumour cells appear more variable. However, it is unclear to what extent these differences merely reflect the increased sensitivities of different detection methods. Here, the design and validation of novel real-time RT-PCR assays to quantify relative levels of EBV transcripts are described. When the new assays were used to screen a collection of endemic Burkitt's lymphoma tumours, abundant Qp-driven EBNA1 expression was found, whereas the other latent transcripts (with the exception of LMP2A) were either absent or detectable only at trace levels. Analysis of 12 nasopharyngeal carcinoma biopsies revealed significant levels of EBNA1 and LMP2A transcripts in almost every case but, in contrast to previous reports, LMP1 expression was undetectable. These new quantitative assays may help to provide a clearer picture of EBV gene expression in tumour material.

Supplementary methods, a sequence alignment of LMP1 exons 2 and 3, figures showing detection of EBV transcripts by real-time RT-PCR and conventional end-point RT-PCR and a table showing TaqMan primer/probe combinations used to detect EBV transcripts are available in JGV Online.


   MAIN TEXT
TOP
ABSTRACT
MAIN TEXT
REFERENCES
 
Epstein–Barr virus, a B-lymphotropic herpesvirus with growth-transforming properties, is linked to a number of human lymphoid- and epithelial-cell malignancies, including post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), Hodgkin's disease (HD), endemic Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (Rickinson & Kieff, 2001Down). Studies of virus-positive cell lines and EBV-associated tumour biopsies have shown that EBV can adopt one of several forms of latent infection, which are distinguished by different patterns of latent antigen expression. In lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), generated by the experimental infection of resting B cells in vitro, and in early-onset PTLD lesions arising in immunocompromised transplant patients (Young et al., 1989Down), EBV expresses the full spectrum of latent genes; these include two small nuclear RNAs (EBERs), the highly spliced BamHI A rightward transcripts (BARTs), six nuclear antigens (EBNA1, -2, -3A, -3B, -3C and -LP) and three latent membrane proteins (LMP1, -2A and -2B) (Rickinson & Kieff, 2001Down). This latency III form of infection is associated with the activity of two promoters, Cp and Wp, that drive the expression of all six EBNA mRNAs (Sample et al., 1986Down; Bodescot et al., 1987Down; Woisetschlaeger et al., 1989Down) and additional promoters in the BamHI N region that transcribe the individual LMP genes (Fennewald et al., 1984Down; Hudson et al., 1985Down; Laux et al., 1989Down). However, the situation is quite different in other virus-positive tumours, which, although positive for the EBER and BART mRNAs, show more restricted patterns of virus latent antigen expression. Thus, most BL tumours and derived BL cell lines that retain the original biopsy cell phenotype in vitro display a latency I form of infection characterized by expression of a single viral protein, EBNA1 (Rowe et al., 1987Down; Gregory et al., 1990Down). In this case, the EBNA1 mRNA is transcribed from a novel promoter Qp (Schaefer et al., 1995Down; Nonkwelo et al., 1996Down), whereas the Wp, Cp and LMP promoters are all silent. NPC tumour cells also express EBNA1 (from Qp), together with variable levels of the LMP proteins (Raab-Traub et al., 1983Down; Fahraeus et al., 1988Down; Young et al., 1988Down; Hitt et al., 1989Down). Despite the substantial body of evidence to support these tumour-associated forms of virus latency, other studies have suggested that BL and NPC biopsies express additional latent- and lytic-cycle antigens (Cochet et al., 1993Down; Niedobitek et al., 1995Down; Chang et al., 1998Down; Tao et al., 1998Down; Xue et al., 2002Down). However, at present it remains unclear whether these latter findings indicate heterogeneity in virus antigen expression in vivo or merely reflect the increased sensitivity of different detection methods. On this point, many earlier studies of EBV-associated tumour cells used end-point reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) assays, often coupled to two rounds of cDNA amplification, to detect EBV transcripts. While this approach is highly sensitive, it follows that positive results can arise from just a small number of isolated cells and therefore the method cannot provide meaningful information about levels of EBV transcripts. To address this problem, the current work describes the development of a panel of quantitative TaqMan RT-PCR assays to measure EBV gene expression.

Expression of viral mRNAs was quantified by TaqMan RT-PCR using an ABI Prism 7700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems), using primer/probe combinations to amplify the Wp- and Cp-initiated EBNA mRNAs, YUK-spliced EBNA1 mRNA, EBNA2 mRNA, LMP1 mRNA and LMP2A mRNA detectable in latency III; Qp-initiated QUK-spliced EBNA1 mRNA present in latency I; the Fp-initiated (FQUK-spliced) mRNA and BZLF1 mRNA associated with the lytic cycle; and the BARTs (full details are given in Supplementary Table S1, available in JGV Online). Whilst most of these primer and probe sequences were designed by using the B95-8 prototype EBV sequence (Baer et al., 1984Down), in several cases it was necessary to take into account the presence of either type- or strain-specific sequence polymorphisms that might otherwise compromise PCR amplification. Thus, in the case of EBNA2, we constructed assays for both the B95-8 (type 1) and the Ag876 (type 2) sequences (Dambaugh et al., 1984Down). Likewise, we designed an alternative assay to detect LMP2A transcripts in Chinese isolates that have been reported to contain sequence changes in exon 2 relative to B95-8 (Busson et al., 1995Down). Finally, in the case of the highly polymorphic LMP1 gene (Sung et al., 1998Down; Edwards et al., 1999Down), we chose primer sequences within conserved regions spanning the exon 2–exon 3 junction region, identified by sequence analysis of a panel of virus isolates from different geographical regions (see Supplementary Fig. S1, available in JGV Online); these primers were used in conjunction with two alternative probes specific for either the B95-8 or CAO LMP1 alleles.

In a series of preliminary experiments, we developed a cDNA synthesis protocol using a pool of 3' gene-specific primers, such that each transcript could be assayed from an aliquot of the same cDNA. We also confirmed the specificity of each primer/probe combination by using RNA isolated from suitable EBV-negative and EBV-positive reference lines and optimized each PCR to maximize the amplification efficiency (data not shown). The quantitative nature of these new assays is immediately apparent from reconstruction experiments using known numbers of EBV-positive cells, which show linearity across the full range of cell dilutions tested (see Supplementary Fig. S2, available in JGV Online); the same amplification plots also demonstrate the high sensitivity of these assays, with all primer/probe combinations (with the exception of the assay for Qp-initiated EBNA1 mRNA) being capable of detecting a single virus-infected cell. By contrast, conventional end-point RT-PCR analyses of the same cell dilutions using established protocols (Tierney et al., 1994Down) were frequently less sensitive and, importantly, yielded signal intensities that gave a grossly distorted impression of the relative levels of EBV gene expression (see Supplementary Fig. S3, available in JGV Online).

These new assays were then used to quantify EBV transcripts in a panel of well-characterized virus-positive B-cell lines; representative data from six LCLs, four latency I BL cell lines and two Wp-restricted BL lines are shown in Fig. 1Down. To allow comparison between different lines, EBV gene-expression data were normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) levels in the same sample and the normalized values were expressed relative to a suitable reference line that was defined as an arbitrary value of 1 (Applied Biosystems, 1997Down). These reference lines included X50-7 LCL [Wp-initiated, YUK-spliced EBNA1, EBNA2 (type 1), LMP1, LMP2A and BARTs], PS-LCL (Cp-initiated EBNA transcripts), Rael-BL (QUK-spliced EBNA1 transcripts) and Sal tr-LCL containing approximately 5 % lytic cells (Fp and BZLF1 transcripts). As seen in Fig. 1(a)Down, all LCLs consistently expressed Cp-, EBNA2, LMP1, LMP2A and YUK-spliced EBNA1 transcripts at levels similar to those seen in the corresponding reference LCL. Wp-initiated transcripts and BARTs were also seen in every case, albeit at more variable levels. Note that the QUK-spliced EBNA1 mRNA signal detectable in several LCLs reflected a small population of lytic cells expressing FQUK-spliced transcripts from the lytic-cycle promoter Fp, as the 5' Q and 3' U/K primer combination detects both Fp-initiated FQUK transcripts and latent Qp-initiated QUK transcripts; in these cases, the presence of cells in the lytic cycle was confirmed by low levels of BZLF1 expression (Fig. 1aDown). In agreement with these RNA data, all six LCLs showed detectable expression of EBNA1, EBNA2, LMP1 and LMP2A at the protein level (Fig. 1bDown). Screening the standard latency I BL lines by using the same PCR assays, we found that the most abundant signals were the QUK-spliced EBNA1 transcript and the BARTs. By contrast, latency III-associated mRNAs were either completely absent or only present in trace amounts (never >1 % relative to the LCL value and in many cases <0.1 %). The notable exception was LMP2A, which was consistently detected at low levels. Western blotting verified EBNA1 expression in these BL lines (Fig. 1bDown), but was unable to confirm the presence of LMP2A protein, either because the levels of mRNA expression were too low or the LMP2A transcripts were not translated. Fig. 1Down also shows the data from two atypical BL lines, Oku-BL and Ava-BL. We have shown previously that these BL lines exhibit a novel form of infection (termed Wp-restricted latency) that is characterized by Wp-driven expression of EBNA1, -3A, -3B, -3C and -LP in the absence of EBNA2 or the LMPs (Habeshaw et al., 1999Down; Kelly et al., 2002Down). These earlier findings are in agreement with the results of the real-time RT-PCR analyses (Fig. 1aDown), which emphasize the high levels of Wp-initiated transcripts in these two BL lines.


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. EBV gene expression in LCL and BL cell lines. (a) Relative quantification of EBV transcripts by real-time RT-PCR. The histograms show the normalized value for the indicated EBV transcript expressed relative to a suitable reference cell line that has an arbitrary value of 1. Error bars indicate SD. (b) Western blot analysis of EBV latent antigen expression. Immunoblotting was carried out by using mAbs 1H4 (anti-EBNA1), PE2 (anti-EBNA2), CS1-4 (anti-LMP1) and TP14B7 (anti-LMP2). X50-7 LCL was included as a positive control.

 
In the next series of experiments, we asked whether the quantitative assays might provide new information about EBV gene expression in primary tumour material. In the first case, we examined a collection of endemic BL tumour biopsies from the West Nile region of Uganda (Habeshaw et al., 1999Down) for which enough material was available to study by both RT-PCR and immunoblotting. All but one case showed a similar pattern of EBNA transcription, characterized by abundant QUK-spliced EBNA1 transcripts (at levels similar to those seen in the reference Rael BL cells) in the absence of significant Wp-, Cp- or YUK-spliced signals (Fig. 2aDown). The exception was the Ava-BL biopsy, which expressed high levels of Wp-initiated EBNA transcripts, a result consistent with data from the tumour-derived Ava-BL cell line. Several biopsies showed weak BZLF1 signals, but these were much weaker than in the reference line, which itself only contains 5 % lytic cells. When analysed for LMP transcripts, all BL biopsies were negative for LMP1, but showed consistent, weak signals for LMP2A. These RNA profiles are consistent with the results of immunoblotting experiments (Fig. 2bDown), which showed robust EBNA1 expression in 11 biopsies (EBNA1 protein was just visible in the Koko-BL sample upon long exposure), whereas there was never detectable expression of EBNA2 or LMP1. Interestingly, blotting for LMP2A revealed faint, specific bands in several tumour extracts, just visible above a non-specific band that was clearly detectable in every track (including the EBV-negative control).


Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. EBV gene expression in BL tumour samples. (a). Relative quantification of EBV transcripts by real-time RT-PCR. The histograms show the normalized value for the indicated EBV transcript expressed relative to a suitable reference cell line that has an arbitrary value of 1. Error bars indicate SD. (b) Western blot analysis of EBV latent antigen expression. Immunoblotting was carried out by using mAbs 1H4 (anti-EBNA1), PE2 (anti-EBNA2), CS1-4 (anti-LMP1) and TP14B7 (anti-LMP2). The EBV-negative B-cell lymphoma line BJAB served as a negative control, whilst X50-7 LCL was included as a positive control.

 
We then went on to screen a series of snap-frozen NPC punch biopsies obtained from Hong Kong NPC patients (Fig. 3Down); in all cases, patient samples were taken following informed consent. Data are shown for 12 samples with well-preserved RNA in which we could detect robust expression of the endogenous GAPDH gene. All biopsies expressed Qp-initiated EBNA1 transcripts and the BARTs, whilst 11 of 12 samples were also positive for LMP2A mRNA (Fig. 3Down). By contrast, assays for Wp-, Cp- and YUK-spliced EBNA1 transcripts were always negative (data not shown), as were RT-PCR amplifications for EBNA2 mRNA in all but one case (using primer/probe combinations for both type 1 and type 2 sequences). Surprisingly, there was little, if any, evidence for LMP1 expression using assays specific for both the B95-8 LMP1 sequence (data not shown) and the Chinese CAO LMP1 sequence (Fig. 3Down); note that, in control experiments, we readily amplified LMP1 signals from several Chinese-derived LCLs (data not shown). Aware of the possibility that our NPC biopsies might contain rare LMP1 polymorphisms, we sequenced the tumour-derived LMP1 gene from seven biopsies for which DNA was available; we found no evidence of sequence changes in the primer or probe regions in six cases, whilst the remaining isolate contained a single nucleotide change (see Supplementary Fig. S1, available in JGV Online).


Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. EBV gene expression in NPC tumour samples determined by real-time PCR. The histograms show the normalized value for the indicated EBV transcript expressed relative to a suitable reference cell line that has an arbitrary value of 1. Error bars indicate SD.

 
Prompted by the need for quantitative protocols to measure EBV transcripts, the current work represents the first detailed study of EBV gene expression using TaqMan RT-PCR; this approach offers several advantages over conventional RT-PCR, including accurate quantification of mRNA levels and normalization of gene expression against an endogenous control gene (Lossos et al., 2003Down). In this study, we have used these assays to re-examine the patterns of EBV gene expression in primary BL and NPC biopsies; in particular, we asked the following question: what is the level of expression of latent and lytic antigens in these tumours relative to the level of Qp-initiated EBNA1 transcripts?

From the analysis of early-passage BL cell lines and BL tumours (Figs 1, 2UpUp), all but the rare Wp-restricted Ava-BL showed the EBNA1-only form of infection described in previous studies (Rowe et al., 1987Down; Gregory et al., 1990Down). Whilst other reports have detected latency III and lytic-cycle transcripts in BL tumour cells (Tao et al., 1998Down; Xue et al., 2002Down), we found that such transcripts were either absent or only detectable at such low levels that they must have been derived from a small minority (usually <0.1 %) of biopsy cells, a result consistent with single-cell studies (Niedobitek et al., 1995Down). Thus, while we cannot exclude the possibility that there may be real differences in virus gene expression among some African BLs, our data suggest strongly that positive results in previous conventional RT-PCR studies probably arose from rare isolated cells. However, one novel finding was the consistently low levels of LMP2A expression. Whilst LMP2A mRNA has been seen previously in BL biopsies (Tao et al., 1998Down; Xue et al., 2002Down), the value of the current quantitative approach is that we can estimate that these LMP2A transcripts are present at up to 10 % of LCL levels. This finding is consistent with the trace amounts of LMP2A protein detected in some biopsies by immunoblotting; unfortunately, the lack of suitable biopsy material prevented further examination of these samples at the single-cell level by immunohistochemical methods.

Screening of 12 NPC biopsies using the new assays revealed the presence of Qp-initiated EBNA1 transcripts and LMP2A transcripts in all but one case, in agreement with previous RNA studies (Brooks et al., 1992Down; Busson et al., 1992Down; Smith & Griffin, 1992Down; Chen et al., 1995Down). Whilst the abundance of these transcripts was generally lower than in the reference lines (which in part probably reflects contamination of the biopsy with normal tissue), the similar relative strengths of these two signals suggest that both EBNA1 and LMP2A are expressed in the majority of tumour cells; the presence of significant levels of LMP2A transcripts is also in accord with a recent histological study that detected LMP2A protein in approximately 50 % of NPC tumours (Heussinger et al., 2004Down). Interestingly, the most abundant transcripts found in our NPC biopsies were the BARTs (Hitt et al., 1989Down; Gilligan et al., 1991Down). Whilst the role of these transcripts in the pathogenesis of NPC remains unclear, it has recently been shown that the BamHI A region of the EBV genome encodes several microRNAs, which are postulated to regulate host or viral gene expression (Pfeffer et al., 2004Down; Cai et al., 2006Down). Finally, one unexpected observation was the lack of detectable LMP1 mRNA in our series of NPC tumours. Whilst LMP1 transcripts have been reported in virtually all cases by using non-quantitative RT-PCR, often using two rounds of amplification (Brooks et al., 1992Down; Chen et al., 1995Down), LMP1 expression at the protein level is only seen in up to 60 % of cases (Fahraeus et al., 1988Down; Young et al., 1988Down). Further work will be needed to reconcile these differences and to test whether these observations reflect variability in EBV gene expression between different histological subtypes of NPC (Nicholls et al., 1997Down) or whether LMP1 expression is no longer required in certain NPC tumours as cellular genetic changes substitute for its functions.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This work was supported by Cancer Research UK. We thank the Functional Genomics Laboratory, University of Birmingham, for help with DNA sequencing analysis.


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
MAIN TEXT
REFERENCES
 
Applied Biosystems (1997). Relative Quantitation of Gene Expression. ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detection System User Bulletin #2: Rev B. http://docs.appliedbiosystems.com/pebiodocs/04303859.pdf

Baer, R., Bankier, A. T., Biggin, M. D. & 9 other authors (1984). DNA sequence and expression of the B95-8 Epstein–Barr virus genome. Nature 310, 207–211.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bodescot, M., Perricaudet, M. & Farrell, P. J. (1987). A promoter for the highly spliced EBNA family of RNAs of Epstein-Barr virus. J Virol 61, 3424–3430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brooks, L., Yao, Q. Y., Rickinson, A. B. & Young, L. S. (1992). Epstein-Barr virus latent gene transcription in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells: coexpression of EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2 transcripts. J Virol 66, 2689–2697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Busson, P., McCoy, R., Sadler, R., Gilligan, K., Tursz, T. & Raab-Traub, N. (1992). Consistent transcription of the Epstein-Barr virus LMP2 gene in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Virol 66, 3257–3262.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Busson, P., Edwards, R. H., Tursz, T. & Raab-Traub, N. (1995). Sequence polymorphism in the Epstein–Barr virus latent membrane protein (LMP)-2 gene. J Gen Virol 76, 139–145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cai, X., Schäfer, A., Lu, S., Bilello, J. P., Desrosiers, R. C., Edwards, R., Raab-Traub, N. & Cullen, B. R. (2006). Epstein – Barr virus microRNAs are evolutionarily conserved and differentially expressed. PLoS Pathog 2, e23.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chang, Y., Sheen, T. S., Lu, J., Huang, Y. T., Chen, J. Y., Yang, C. S. & Tsai, C. H. (1998). Detection of transcripts initiated from two viral promoters (Cp and Wp) in Epstein-Barr virus-infected nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells and biopsies. Lab Invest 78, 715–726.[Medline]

Chen, F., Hu, L.-F., Ernberg, I., Klein, G. & Winberg, G. (1995). Coupled transcription of Epstein–Barr virus latent membrane protein (LMP)-1 and LMP-2B genes in nasopharyngeal carcinomas. J Gen Virol 76, 131–138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cochet, C., Martel-Renoir, D., Grunewald, V., Bosq, J., Cochet, G., Schwaab, G., Bernaudin, J.-F. & Joab, I. (1993). Expression of the Epstein-Barr virus immediate early gene, BZLF1, in nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumour cells. Virology 197, 358–365.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dambaugh, T., Hennessy, K., Chamnankit, L. & Kieff, E. (1984). U2 region of Epstein–Barr virus DNA may encode Epstein–Barr nuclear antigen 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 81, 7632–7636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Edwards, R. H., Seillier-Moiseiwitsch, F. & Raab-Traub, N. (1999). Signature amino acid changes in latent membrane protein 1 distinguish Epstein–Barr virus strains. Virology 261, 79–95.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fahraeus, R., Fu, H. L., Ernberg, I. & 9 other authors (1988). Expression of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded proteins in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Cancer 42, 329–338.[Medline]

Fennewald, S., van Santen, V. & Kieff, E. (1984). Nucleotide sequence of an mRNA transcribed in latent growth-transforming virus infection indicates that it may encode a membrane protein. J Virol 51, 411–419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gilligan, K. J., Rajadurai, J. & Lin, J.-C. (1991). Expression of the Epstein-Barr virus BamHI A fragment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: evidence for a viral protein expressed in vivo. J Virol 65, 6252–6259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gregory, C. D., Rowe, M. & Rickinson, A. B. (1990). Different Epstein–Barr virus–B cell interactions in phenotypically distinct clones of a Burkitt's lymphoma cell line. J Gen Virol 71, 1481–1495.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Habeshaw, G., Yao, Q. Y., Bell, A. I., Morton, D. & Rickinson, A. B. (1999). Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 sequences in endemic and sporadic Burkitt's lymphoma reflect virus strains prevalent in different geographic areas. J Virol 73, 965–975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Heussinger, N., Büttner, M., Ott, G., Brachtel, E., Pilch, B. Z., Kremmer, E. & Niedobitek, G. (2004). Expression of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded latent membrane protein 2A (LMP2A) in EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Pathol 203, 696–699.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hitt, M. M., Allday, M. J., Hara, T., Karran, L., Jones, M. D., Busson, P., Tursz, T., Ernberg, I. & Griffin, B. E. (1989). EBV gene expression in an NPC-related tumour. EMBO J 8, 2639–2651.[Medline]

Hudson, G. S., Farrell, P. J. & Barrell, B. G. (1985). Two related but differentially expressed potential membrane proteins encoded by the EcoRI Dhet region of Epstein-Barr virus B95-8. J Virol 53, 528–535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kelly, G., Bell, A. & Rickinson, A. (2002). Epstein–Barr virus-associated Burkitt lymphomagenesis selects for downregulation of the nuclear antigen EBNA2. Nat Med 8, 1098–1104.[CrossRef][Medline]

Laux, G., Economou, A. & Farrell, P. J. (1989). The terminal protein gene 2 of Epstein–Barr virus is transcribed from a bidirectional latent promoter region. J Gen Virol 70, 3079–3084.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lossos, I. S., Czerwinski, D. K., Wechser, M. A. & Levy, R. (2003). Optimization of quantitative real-time RT-PCR parameters for the study of lymphoid malignancies. Leukemia 17, 789–795.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nicholls, J. M., Agathanggelou, A., Fung, K., Zeng, X. & Niedobitek, G. (1997). The association of squamous cell carcinomas of the nasopharynx with Epstein-Barr virus shows geographical variation reminiscent of Burkitt's lymphoma. J Pathol 183, 164–168.[CrossRef][Medline]

Niedobitek, G., Agathanggelou, A., Rowe, M., Jones, E. L., Jones, D. B., Turyaguma, P., Oryema, J., Wright, D. H. & Young, L. S. (1995). Heterogeneous expression of Epstein-Barr virus latent proteins in endemic Burkitt's lymphoma. Blood 86, 659–665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nonkwelo, C., Skinner, J., Bell, A., Rickinson, A. & Sample, J. (1996). Transcription start sites downstream of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) Fp promoter in early-passage Burkitt lymphoma cells define a fourth promoter for expression of the EBV EBNA-1 protein. J Virol 70, 623–627.[Abstract]

Pfeffer, S., Zavolan, M., Grässer, F. A. & 8 other authors (2004). Identification of virus-encoded microRNAs. Science 304, 734–736.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Raab-Traub, N., Hood, R., Yang, C.-S., Henry, B., II & Pagano, J. S. (1983). Epstein-Barr virus transcription in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Virol 48, 580–590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rickinson, A. B. & Kieff, E. (2001). Epstein-Barr virus. In Fields Virology, 4th edn, pp. 2575–2627. Edited by D. M. Knipe & P. M. Howley. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.

Rowe, M., Rowe, D. T., Gregory, C. D., Young, L. S., Farrell, P. J., Rupani, H. & Rickinson, A. B. (1987). Differences in B cell growth phenotype reflect novel patterns of Epstein–Barr virus latent gene expression in Burkitt's lymphoma cells. EMBO J 6, 2743–2751.[Medline]

Sample, J., Hummel, M., Braun, D., Birkenbach, M. & Kieff, E. (1986). Nucleotide sequences of mRNAs encoding Epstein–Barr virus nuclear proteins: a probable transcriptional initiation site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83, 5096–5100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schaefer, B. C., Strominger, J. L. & Speck, S. H. (1995). Redefining the Epstein–Barr virus-encoded nuclear antigen EBNA-1 gene promoter and transcription initiation site in group I Burkitt lymphoma cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92, 10565–10569.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Smith, P. R. & Griffin, B. E. (1992). Transcription of the Epstein-Barr virus gene EBNA-1 from different promoters in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and B-lymphoblastoid cells. J Virol 66, 706–714.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sung, N. S., Edwards, R. H., Seillier-Moiseiwitsch, F., Perkins, A. G., Zeng, Y. & Raab-Traub, N. (1998). Epstein-Barr virus strain variation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma from the endemic and non-endemic regions of China. Int J Cancer 76, 207–215.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tao, Q., Robertson, K. D., Manns, A., Hildesheim, A. & Ambinder, R. F. (1998). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in endemic Burkitt's lymphoma: molecular analysis of primary tumor tissue. Blood 91, 1373–1381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tierney, R. J., Steven, N., Young, L. S. & Rickinson, A. B. (1994). Epstein-Barr virus latency in blood mononuclear cells: analysis of viral gene transcription during primary infection and in the carrier state. J Virol 68, 7374–7385.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Woisetschlaeger, M., Strominger, J. L. & Speck, S. H. (1989). Mutually exclusive use of viral promoters in Epstein–Barr virus latently infected lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86, 6498–6502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Xue, S.-A., Labrecque, L. G., Lu, Q.-L. & 7 other authors (2002). Promiscuous expression of Epstein-Barr virus genes in Burkitt's lymphoma from the central African country Malawi. Int J Cancer 99, 635–643.[CrossRef][Medline]

Young, L. S., Dawson, C. W., Clark, D., Rupani, H., Busson, P., Tursz, T., Johnson, A. & Rickinson, A. B. (1988). Epstein–Barr virus gene expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Gen Virol 69, 1051–1065.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Young, L., Alfieri, C., Hennessy, K. & 7 other authors (1989). Expression of Epstein-Barr virus transformation-associated genes in tissues of patients with EBV lymphoproliferative disease. N Engl J Med 321, 1080–1085.[Abstract]

Received 3 February 2006; accepted 24 May 2006.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
L. J. Anderson and R. Longnecker
EBV LMP2A provides a surrogate pre-B cell receptor signal through constitutive activation of the ERK/MAPK pathway
J. Gen. Virol., July 1, 2008; 89(7): 1563 - 1568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Mancao and W. Hammerschmidt
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 2A is a B-cell receptor mimic and essential for B-cell survival
Blood, November 15, 2007; 110(10): 3715 - 3721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. K. F. Lo, K. F. To, K. W. Lo, R. W. M. Lung, J. W. Y. Hui, G. Liao, and S. D. Hayward
Modulation of LMP1 protein expression by EBV-encoded microRNAs
PNAS, October 9, 2007; 104(41): 16164 - 16169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
R. Tierney, J. Nagra, I. Hutchings, C. Shannon-Lowe, M. Altmann, W. Hammerschmidt, A. Rickinson, and A. Bell
Epstein-Barr Virus Exploits BSAP/Pax5 To Achieve the B-Cell Specificity of Its Growth-Transforming Program
J. Virol., September 15, 2007; 81(18): 10092 - 10100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Fukuda and R. Longnecker
Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 2A Mediates Transformation through Constitutive Activation of the Ras/PI3-K/Akt Pathway
J. Virol., September 1, 2007; 81(17): 9299 - 9306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rickinson, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bell, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rickinson, A. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bell, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rickinson, A. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS