J Gen Virol 87 (2006), 395-398; DOI 10.1099/vir.0.81481-0
© 2006 Society for General Microbiology
The cytoplasmic domain of the F protein of Human respiratory syncytial virus is not required for cell fusion
Patrick J. Branigan1,
Nicole D. Day1,
Changbao Liu1,
Lester L. Gutshall1,
José A. Melero2,
Robert T. Sarisky1 and
Alfred M. Del Vecchio1
1 Department of Infectious Diseases Research, Centocor Inc., 145 King of Prussia Road, Radnor, PA 19087, USA
2 Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, 28220 Madrid, Spain
Correspondence
Alfred M. Del Vecchio
Adelvecc{at}cntus.jnj.com
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
The cytoplasmic domains of the fusion proteins encoded by several viruses play a role in cell fusion and contain sites for palmitoylation associated with viral protein trafficking and virus assembly. The fusion (F) protein of Human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) has a predicted cytoplasmic domain of 26 residues containing a single palmitoylated cysteine residue that is conserved in bovine RSV F protein, but not in the F proteins of other pneumoviruses such as pneumonia virus of mice, human metapneumovirus and avian pneumovirus. The cytoplasmic domains in other paramyxovirus fusion proteins such as Newcastle disease virus F protein play a role in fusion. In this study, it was shown that deletion of the entire cytoplasmic domain or mutation of the single cysteine residue (C550S) of the HRSV F protein had no effect on protein processing, cell-surface expression or fusion.
 |
MAIN TEXT
|
|---|
The subfamily Pneumovirinae of the family Paramyxoviridae includes many important pathogens of humans and animals, such as Human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV), bovine RSV, pneumonia virus of mice, human metapneumovirus and avian pneumovirus (Lamb & Kolakofsky, 2001
). HRSV infection is the single most common cause of hospitalization of infants and young children due to bronchiolitis and pneumonia, and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among the elderly and transplant recipients (Han et al., 1999
; Ison & Hayden, 2002
; Thompson et al., 2003
; Whimbey & Ghosh, 2000
). The fusion (F) proteins of pneumoviruses play critical roles in promoting the entry and assembly of infectious virions and have an overall structural organization similar to other type I membrane viral fusion proteins (reviewed by Colman & Lawrence, 2003
). The HRSV F mRNA is translated into a 574 aa precursor protein designated F0, which is cleaved at two sites (Gonzalez-Reyes et al., 2001
) by furin in the trans-Golgi (Bolt et al., 2000
; Collins & Mottet, 1991
), generating two subunits designated F1 (
50 kDa) and F2 (
20 kDa) (Rixon et al., 2002
). The F1 and F2 chains are joined together by disulfide-bond formation (Gruber & Levine, 1983
; Scheid & Choppin, 1977
). The mature form of the F protein present on the surface of the virus and infected cells is believed to consist of a homotrimer of three non-covalently associated units of F1F2. The F1 subunit contains an N-terminal hydrophobic fusion peptide region followed by two heptad repeat regions (HRA and HRB) separated by an intervening cysteine-rich region and a hydrophobic transmembrane domain located near the C terminus of the protein followed by a short (26 aa) cytoplasmic domain containing a single cysteine residue (C550), which has been shown to be the site of addition for a palmitoyl group (Arumugham et al., 1989
). Previous studies of the F protein of the paramyxovirus Newcastle disease virus (NDV) demonstrated that deletion of the entire cytoplasmic domain altered protein processing and abolished syncytia formation (Sergel & Morrison, 1995
). To determine whether the cytoplasmic domain of the F protein or its single cysteine (C550) plays a similar role in fusion, we prepared a construct in which aa 549574 were deleted (
CT), as well as one in which C550 was changed to a serine (C550S). The effect of these mutations on protein expression, processing and the ability to cause cellcell fusion was examined.
Plasmid pHRSVFOptA2 containing the coding region of the HRSV F protein (subgroup A, strain A2; amino acid sequence derived from a known infectious HRSV cDNA and codon optimized) cloned into pcDNA3.1/Hygro() (Invitrogen) has been described previously (Branigan et al., 2005
; Morton et al., 2003
). The codon encoding HRSV F C550 in pHRSVFOptA2 was changed to serine by site-directed mutagenesis using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). Plasmid p
CT truncates the HRSV F protein-coding region in pHRSVFOptA2 immediately after the transmembrane domain, deleting the entire cytoplasmic domain (aa 549574). Plasmid pCMV
(BD Biosciences Clontech) expresses the
-galactosidase gene under the control of the human cytomegalovirus promoter. 293T cells were transfected with plasmids pHRSVFOptA2, pC550S, p
CT or the negative control plasmids pCMV
or pcDNA3.1/Hygro() vector only, and expression and protein processing were assayed by metabolic labelling, followed by immunoprecipitation with a cocktail of anti-HRSV F monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) as described previously (Branigan et al., 2005
). A band migrating at approximately 45 kDa was detected in all immunoprecipitates, including those from cells transfected with the negative control plasmid pCMV
or pcDNA3.1/Hygro() and most likely represents a non-specific, co-immunoprecipitating protein. Labelled bands migrating at the expected sizes for the F1 and F2 subunits (
50 and
20 kDa, respectively) of the wild-type (WT) HRSV F protein were detected readily as indicated (Fig. 1
, lane 2). Neither mutation of C550 to serine (Fig. 1
, lane 1, C550S) nor deletion of the entire cytoplasmic tail (Fig. 1
, lane 3,
CT) had any effect on protein processing relative to WT, although as expected, the F1 subunit encoded by p
CT migrated faster than the WT (Fig. 1
, lane 3,
CT) due to the truncation of the cytoplasmic domain.
To assess cell-surface expression, 293T cells were seeded into 96-well plates and transfected with plasmids pHRSVFOptA2, pC550S, p
CT or negative controls, and the levels of the HRSV F protein on the cell surface were determined by flow cytometry and ELISA. At 2024 h post-transfection, cells were assayed for binding of the anti-HRSV F protein mAb, palivizumab (Johnson et al., 1997
), under permeabilizing or non-permeabilizing conditions. Cells were fixed by the addition of 0·05 % glutaraldehyde (Sigma) in 1x PBS for 15 min at room temperature and washed under either permeabilizing (0·1 % Triton X-100 in PBS) or non-permeabilizing (0·05 % Tween 20 in PBS) conditions. These conditions were verified using an anti-HRSV N protein mAb (clone # M291207; Fitzgerald Industries International) and HRSV-infected cells. HRSV N protein is produced only within the cytoplasm of HRSV-infected cells. The anti-N mAb yielded a strong positive signal in infected cells when wash buffer containing 0·1 % Triton X-100 was used, but not when wash buffer containing 0·05 % Tween 20 was used (data not shown). Cells were blocked for 1 h with SuperBlock (Pierce Biotechnology), followed by incubation with 1 µg palivizumab ml1 for 1 h at room temperature. Samples were then incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-human IgG (Amersham Biosciences) at a dilution of 1 : 800 for 1 h at room temperature, followed by detection with TMB substrate (Sigma). The reaction was stopped with the addition of 1 M sulfuric acid and the optical density was read at 450 nm. Values were calculated as percentage relative to WT HRSV F protein after adjusting for background signal from the vector-only control. Neither mutation of C550 to serine nor deletion of the entire cytoplasmic domain had any effect on the levels of cell-surface HRSV F protein expression as assayed by ELISA (Fig. 2a
). This finding was confirmed by using flow cytometry (Fig. 2b
) using conditions described previously (Branigan et al., 2005
).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Cell-surface expression. (a) At 2024 h post-transfection, 293T cells were assayed for binding of the anti-HRSV F protein mAb, palivizumab, using an ELISA under permeabilizing (filled bars) or non-permeabilizing (open bars) conditions. Mean results±SD were obtained from three determinations and were calculated as a percentage relative to WT HRSV F (100 %) after adjusting for background signal from the vector-only control. (b) At 2024 h post-transfection, 293T cells were assayed for binding of palivizumab by flow cytometry. A representative histogram plot is shown from cells transfected with vector only (), WT HRSV F, the cysteine mutant (C550S) or the cytoplasmic deletion mutant ( CT).
|
|
The ability of the C550S mutant and cytoplasmic domain deletion mutant to promote cell fusion was assayed using methods described previously (Branigan et al., 2005
). In contrast to NDV F protein, where deletion of the entire cytoplasmic domain abolished syncytia formation (Sergel & Morrison, 1995
), deletion of the entire cytoplasmic domain reduced fusion activity by approximately 36 % relative to WT HRSV F protein (Fig. 3
), but still retained significant fusion activity at 37 °C. This finding indicated that the cytoplasmic domain of the HRSV F protein is not required for fusion and that the extracellular and transmembrane domains are sufficient to mediate fusion. The fusion activity of the C550S mutation was slightly increased (128 %) relative to WT (100 %) (Fig. 3
). As mutation of cysteine residues in other viral fusion proteins has been reported to cause a temperature-sensitive (ts) phenotype (Long et al., 1990
), we also examined fusion activity at 32 and 39·5 °C. These temperatures were selected as HRSV mutants sensitive for these two temperatures have been described previously (Gharpure et al., 1969
; Hsu et al., 1995
). The overall levels of WT HRSV F-mediated cell fusion were reduced by approximately 50 % at either 32 or 39·5 °C relative to 37 °C (Fig. 3
). It is possible that the reduction in fusion observed at 32 and 39·5 °C was due to slower kinetics of overall fusion at the lower temperature and lower levels of cell-surface protein expression at the higher temperature, although further experimentation is needed to support this hypothesis. Although the absolute levels of cell fusion were reduced at both 32 and 39·5 °C relative to 37 °C for all proteins including WT (Fig. 3
), there were no differences observed in their relative fusion activities at either 32 or 39·5 °C relative to 37 °C, suggesting a lack of a ts phenotype for fusion for either the C550S mutation or the cytoplasmic domain deletion mutation (Fig. 3
).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Fusion activity of HRSV F proteins. 293T cells were transfected with plasmids encoding the WT HRSV F protein, HRSV F protein lacking the cytoplasmic domain ( CT) or HRSV F protein containing the C550S mutation (C550S) and fusion activity was measured at 32, 37 or 39·5 °C. Fusion activity is represented as relative light units (RLU) and represents the mean±SD of three separate determinations.
|
|
The results presented here demonstrated that the cytoplasmic domain of the HRSV F protein is not required for cell fusion. These findings are intriguing, as deletion of the entire cytoplasmic domain of NDV F protein dramatically reduced precursor protein processing and syncytium formation in a previous study (Sergel & Morrison, 1995
); however, the assays used to measure fusion in those studies and those presented here are different and cannot be compared directly. This finding is intriguing, as the NDV F protein X-ray structure has been used to generate a structural model of the HRSV F protein (Morton et al., 2003
; Smith et al., 2002
). Although the NDV and HRSV F proteins appear to be related structurally, these results highlight a functional difference between these proteins and give further support to the difference in classification between the paramyxovirus and pneumovirus genera. C550 is the only cysteine present in the cytoplasmic domain of the HRSV F protein and is the site of addition of a palmitoyl group (Arumugham et al., 1989
). Palmitoylation of viral fusion proteins affects trafficking to lipid rafts, which can play a role in virus assembly, as described for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (Bhattacharya et al., 2004
). Neither palmitoylation nor association with lipid rafts is required by NDV F protein for cell fusion (Dolganuic et al., 2003
; Sergel & Morrison, 1995
). HRSV proteins associate with lipid rafts (Brown et al., 2004
) and this association is thought to play a role in viral assembly. Although both the C550S mutation and the deletion of the entire cytoplasmic domain support the hypothesis that palmitoylation is not required for HRSV F protein fusion, we are currently investigating the role of the HRSV F protein cytoplasmic domain and palmitoylation in lipid raft trafficking and virus assembly.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
|
|---|
We thank Geraldine Taylor for helpful discussions and comments. We thank William Glass, Jarrat Jordan and Lamine Mbow for critical review of this manuscript.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
Arumugham, R. G., Seid, R. C., Jr, Doyle, S., Hildreth, S. W. & Paradiso, P. R. (1989). Fatty acid acylation of the fusion glycoprotein of human respiratory syncytial virus. J Biol Chem 264, 1033910342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]Bhattacharya, J., Peters, P. J. & Clapham, P. R. (2004). Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoproteins that lack cytoplasmic domain cysteines: impact on association with membrane lipid rafts and incorporation onto budding virus particles. J Virol 78, 55005506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Bolt, G., Pedersen, L. O. & Birkeslund, H. H. (2000). Cleavage of the respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein is required for its surface expression: role of furin. Virus Res 68, 2533.[CrossRef][Medline]
Branigan, P. J., Liu, C., Day, N. D., Gutshall, L. L., Sarisky, R. T. & Del Vecchio, A. M. (2005). Use of a novel cell-based fusion reporter assay to explore the host range of human respiratory syncytial virus F protein. Virol J 2, 54.[Medline]
Brown, G., Jeffree, C. E., McDonald, T., Rixon, H. W. McL., Aitken, J. D. & Sugrue, R. J. (2004). Analysis of the interaction between respiratory syncytial virus and lipid-rafts in Hep2 cells during infection. Virology 327, 175185.[CrossRef][Medline]
Collins, P. L. & Mottet, G. (1991). Post-translational processing and oligomerization of the fusion glycoprotein of human respiratory syncytial virus. J Gen Virol 72, 30953101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Colman, P. M. & Lawrence, M. C. (2003). The structural biology of type I viral membrane fusion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4, 309319.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dolganuic, V., Mc Ginnes, L., Luna, E. J. & Morrison, T. G. (2003). Role of the cytoplasmic domain of the Newcastle disease virus fusion protein in association with lipid rafts. J Virol 77, 1296812979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gharpure, M. A., Wright, P. F. & Chanock, R. M. (1969). Temperature-sensitive mutants of respiratory syncytial virus. J Virol 3, 414421.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gonzalez-Reyes, L., Ruiz-Arguello, M. B., Garcia-Barreno, B., Calder, L., López, J. A., Albar, J. P., Skehel, J. J., Wiley, D. C. & Melero, J. A. (2001). Cleavage of the human respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein at two distinct sites is required for activation of membrane fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 98599864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gruber, C. & Levine, S. (1983). Respiratory syncytial virus polypeptides. III. The envelope-associated proteins. J Gen Virol 64, 825832.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Han, L. L., Alexander, J. P. & Anderson, L. J. (1999). Respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia among the elderly: an assessment of disease burden. J Infect Dis 179, 2530.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hsu, K.-H. L., Crowe, J. E., Jr, Lubeck, M. D., Davis, A. R., Hung, P. P., Chanock, R. M. & Murphy, B. R. (1995). Isolation and characterization of a highly attenuated respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine candidate by mutagenesis of the incompletely attenuated RSV A2 ts-1 NG-1 mutant virus. Vaccine 13, 509515.[Medline]
Ison, M. G. & Hayden, F. G. (2002). Viral infections in immunocompromised patients: what's new with respiratory viruses? Curr Opin Infect Dis 15, 355367.[Medline]
Johnson, S., Oliver, C., Prince, G. A. & 13 other authors (1997). Development of a humanized monoclonal antibody (MEDI-493) with potent in vitro and in vivo activity against respiratory syncytial virus. J Infect Dis 176, 12151224.[Medline]
Lamb, R. A. & Kolakofsky, D. (2001). Paramyxoviridae: the viruses and their replication. In Fields Virology, 4th edn, pp. 13051340. Edited by D. M. Knipe & P. M. Howley. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
Long, D., Cohen, G. H., Muggeridge, M. I. & Eisenberg, R. J. (1990). Cysteine mutants of herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein D exhibit temperature-sensitive properties in structure and function. J Virol 64, 55425552.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Morton, C. J., Cameron, R., Lawrence, L. J. & 11 other authors (2003). Structural characterization of respiratory syncytial virus fusion inhibitor escape mutants: homology model of the F protein and a syncytium formation assay. Virology 311, 275288.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rixon, H. W. McL., Brown, C., Brown, G. & Sugrue, R. J. (2002). Multiple glycosylated forms of the respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein are expressed in virus-infected cells. J Gen Virol 83, 6166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Scheid, A. & Choppin, R. W. (1977). Two disulfide-linked polypeptide chains constitute the active F protein of paramyxoviruses. Virology 80, 5466.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sergel, T. & Morrison, T. G. (1995). Mutations in the cytoplasmic domain of the fusion glycoprotein of Newcastle disease virus depress syncytia formation. Virology 210, 264272.[CrossRef][Medline]
Smith, B. J., Lawrence, M. C. & Colman, P. M. (2002). Modelling the structure of the fusion protein from human respiratory syncytial virus. Protein Eng 15, 365371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Thompson, W. W., Shay, D. K., Weintraub, E., Brammer, L., Cox, N., Anderson, L. J. & Fukuda, K. (2003). Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States. JAMA 289, 179186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Whimbey, E. & Ghosh, S. (2000). Respiratory syncytial virus infections in immunocompromised adults. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis 20, 232255.[Medline]
Received 31 August 2005;
accepted 19 October 2005.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. C. Aguilar, K. A. Matreyek, D. Y. Choi, C. M. Filone, S. Young, and B. Lee
Polybasic KKR Motif in the Cytoplasmic Tail of Nipah Virus Fusion Protein Modulates Membrane Fusion by Inside-Out Signaling
J. Virol.,
May 1, 2007;
81(9):
4520 - 4532.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. G. P. Oomens, K. P. Bevis, and G. W. Wertz
The Cytoplasmic Tail of the Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus F Protein Plays Critical Roles in Cellular Localization of the F Protein and Infectious Progeny Production
J. Virol.,
November 1, 2006;
80(21):
10465 - 10477.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|