| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Department of Entomology and Nematology, National Agricultural Research Center, Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8666, Japan
Correspondence
Chie Goto
cgoto{at}affrc.go.jp
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Lepidopteran NPVs can be divided phylogenetically into two groups, I and II (Zanotto et al., 1993
; Herniou et al., 2001). The infection process of NPVs, including in vivo and in vitro multiplication, has been characterized mainly using the group I NPVs, such as Autographa californica NPV (AcMNPV), Orgyia pseudotsugata NPV (OpMNPV) and Bombyx mori NPV (BmNPV) (e.g. Williams & Faulkner, 1997; Bonning, 2005). BVs of the group I NPVs contain a glycoprotein, GP64, an envelope-fusion protein required for the spread of infection to other cells and for efficient budding from the cell surface (Monsma et al., 1996; Oomens & Blissard, 1999). In contrast, BVs of group II NPVs lack GP64, but possess in its place the F protein (Lung et al., 2003). Thus, it is possible that functional differences between these fusion proteins may lead to differences between the multiplication strategies of the group I and group II NPVs in the host haemocoel. Several studies of the multiplication of the group II NPVs, such as Lymantria dispar NPV (LdMNPV; Riegel & Slavicek, 1997), Helicoverpa zea NPV (HzSNPV; Granados et al., 1981), Mamestra brassicae NPV (MabrNPV; Kondo et al., 1995), Spodoptera exigua NPV (SeMNPV; Hara et al., 1994) and Spodoptera frugiperda NPV (Knudson & Tinsley, 1974), have been performed in insect cell lines. These studies, however, are limited in comparison with those of group I NPVs. In terms of in vivo studies, there are several reports on the lethal effect and the survival time of the host larvae using recombinants of LdMNPV (Slavicek et al., 1999), SeMNPV (Dai et al., 2000) and Helicoverpa armigera NPV (Sun et al., 2002, 2004) and on the infection process of HzSNPV (Washburn et al., 2001, 2003), but only a few reports on the multiplication of other group II NPVs (Evans et al., 1981).
The cabbage armyworm, M. brassicae L., is an important insect pest of vegetables and ornamental plants in Europe and Asia. Several NPVs have been isolated from M. brassicae over wide regions of Europe and Japan (Aruga et al., 1960; Okada, 1977; Vlak & Gröner, 1980; Brown et al., 1981). These viruses, named MabrNPV, have been considered useful biological-control agents for M. brassicae (Akutsu, 1972; Brown et al., 1981; Evans & Allaway, 1983). There are several reports of the identification and characterization of MabrNPV strains isolated in Europe (Kelly & Brown, 1980; Vlak & Gröner, 1980; Erlandson, 1990; Clarke et al., 1996; Rovesti et al., 2000), as well as NPVs isolated from Mamestra configurata, a species related closely to M. brassicae, in North America (Erlandson, 1990; Li et al., 2002, 2005). However, Japanese strains of MabrNPV are poorly characterized, especially at the molecular level. For the practical use of NPVs as a control agent of noctuid pests, it is necessary to identify and characterize the virus strain in advance. The objective of our study was the phylogenetic and phenotypic characterization of a MabrNPV isolate derived from a diseased larva of M. brassicae found in Tokyo, Japan.
In order to gain a better understanding of the multiplication of MabrNPV in vivo, we measured the increase in MabrNPV DNAs over time in the haemolymph of M. brassicae by using real-time quantitative PCR (RTQ-PCR). RTQ-PCR has been utilized as a rapid and simple method for the detection of baculovirus titres in vitro (Rosinski et al., 2002; Lo & Chao, 2004; Vanarsdall et al., 2005) and we confirmed the effectiveness of this method for in vivo studies. As the baculovirus virion is generally composed of a single nucleocapsid (Williams & Faulkner, 1997), we assumed that there was a direct correlation between the amount of viral genomic DNA and the number of BVs. Moreover, the ability of stilbene-derived fluorescent brightener to enhance the infection of MabrNPV was tested. In this report, we elucidated the multiplication of MabrNPV in the host haemolymph with two factors of virus growth: the time taken from primary infection to secondary infection and the trend of BV increase following low and extremely high inoculation doses of ODVs.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
MabrNPV T strain (Aruga et al., 1960; Akutsu, 1972) was obtained from Dr Kisaku Akutsu at the Tokyo Metropolitan Agricultural Experiment Station. MabrNPV T was propagated in larvae of M. brassicae and purified basically as described previously (Kunimi & Yamada, 1990) but using 10 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.5) instead of PBS. The concentration of polyhedral inclusion bodies (PIBs) in the stock suspension was determined by using a Thoma haemocytometer under a phase-contrast microscope. PIBs were stored at 4 °C until use. Although no submolar bands were observed in the original MabrNPV obtained from Dr Akutsu by restriction-endonuclease analysis, an isolate named T5 was newly isolated from MabrNPV T by using conventional methods of low-dose inoculation (Smith & Crook, 1988) for five passages in larvae of M. brassicae and used for DNA sequencing.
The ability of the fluorescent brightener Tinopal (Fluorescent brightener 28, Tinopal UNPA-GX; Sigma) to enhance the infectivity of MabrNPV T was tested at a final concentration of 1 % (w/v).
Identification and sequencing of the polh, egt and lef-3 genes of MabrNPV T.
DNA was extracted from PIBs of MabrNPV T5 basically as described by Goto et al. (1992). Genomic DNA from MabrNPV T5 was digested with HindIII or EcoRV and ligated into pBluescript II KS(+) and transformed into Escherichia coli JM109 competent cells. DNA sequencing was conducted by using an ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing kit and a capillary sequencer ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems). The individual viral DNA fragments were sequenced by using universal or M13 primers. For the amplification and sequencing of the internal regions of the polyhedrin (polh) or ecdysteroid UDP-glucosyltransferase (egt) genes, specific or degenerate primers were synthesized as follows: PSF002 (5'-GGIICCIGGYAARAAYCA-3'), PER001 (5'-GGIRCRTCIGGIGCRAAYTCYTT-3') and P1172R (5'-CGGTTCAAGAAGTGCAACAA-3') for polh, and EGT+98, EGT+1363, EGT+1089D and EGT+517D [Clarke et al., 1996 (with slight modifications); Nakai et al., 2002] for egt.
Homology searches were carried out by using the updated DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database via the NCBI website and the BLAST algorithm (Altschul et al., 1990). Nucleotide sequences of the NPVs used in this comparison were as follows: AcMNPV (GenBank accession no. L22858
[GenBank]
), BmNPV (GenBank no. L33180
[GenBank]
), Choristoneura fumiferana NPV (CfMNPV; GenBank no. AF512031
[GenBank]
), Epiphyas postvittana NPV (EppoNPV; GenBank no. AY043265
[GenBank]
), OpMNPV (GenBank no. U75930
[GenBank]
), Adoxophyes honmai NPV (AdhoNPV; GenBank no. AP006270
[GenBank]
), HzSNPV (GenBank no. AF334030
[GenBank]
), LdMNPV (GenBank no. AF081810
[GenBank]
), Mamestra configurata NPV strain 90/2 (MacoNPV A; GenBank no. AF467808), M. configurata NPV B (MacoNPV B; GenBank no. AY126275
[GenBank]
), SeMNPV (GenBank no. AF169823
[GenBank]
), Spodoptera litura NPV (GenBank no. AF325155
[GenBank]
), and M. brassicae NPV strain Oxford (MabrNPV Oxford; GenBank no. M20927
[GenBank]
for polh and U41999
[GenBank]
for egt). Pairwise and multiple sequence alignments were performed by using CLUSTAL_W (Thompson et al., 1994) implemented in the BioEdit program, version 7.0.1 (Hall, 1999). Neighbour-joining (NJ) distance, maximum-parsimony (MP) and minimum-evolution (ME) analyses (1000 bootstrap replicates) were inferred from the amino acid sequence alignments by using MEGA version 2.1 (Nei & Kumar, 2000). Introduced gaps were treated as missing data and MP trees were analysed by a max-mini branch-and-bound search.
Droplet-feeding bioassay.
Larvae of M. brassicae were inoculated by a modified droplet-feeding method (Kunimi & Fuxa, 1996). Fourth-instar larvae at a moulting stage (i.e. head capsule slippage) were selected and transferred to 0.6 ml plastic tubes without food. Within 24 h of moulting, each fifth-instar larva was inoculated with 3.2 µl of a solution containing 10 % (w/v) sucrose and 1 % (w/v) red food colouring (Ogura Shokuhin kakou) in 10 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.5), as well as PIBs and 1 % (w/v) Tinopal as appropriate. Larvae that completely ingested the droplet were transferred to 24 ml plastic cups and reared individually on a virus-free diet. The concentrations of MabrNPV used in the experiments were 105, 105.5, 106, 106.5, 107, 107.5, 108, 108.5 and 109 PIBs ml–1 without Tinopal, and 102, 102.5, 103, 103.5, 104 and 104.5 PIBs ml–1 with Tinopal. Experiments were replicated three times with 28–36 larvae per treatment. Larvae were observed daily for mortality until 21 days after inoculation. Tissue smears were prepared from dead larvae and examined for the presence of PIBs by using a phase-contrast microscope.
In order to determine the lethal times following inoculation at an LD95 equivalent dose (i.e. 1.1x106 PIBs per larva without Tinopal and 5.8x101 PIBs per larva with Tinopal) or at a 1000-fold LD95 dose (i.e. 5.8x104 PIBs per larva with Tinopal), 47–48 larvae per treatment were used and checked at 12 h intervals after inoculation. Replicate inoculations were performed with 23–24 larvae per treatment in order to determine larval body weight at 120 h post-inoculation (p.i.).
Collection of haemolymph.
Newly moulted fifth-instar larvae were inoculated with MabrNPV alone or MabrNPV and 1 % (w/v) Tinopal at an LD95 equivalent dose or at a 1000-fold LD95 dose with 1 % (w/v) Tinopal as described above. Cell-free haemolymph was prepared basically as described by Granados & Lawler (1981). Haemolymph was collected from individual larvae at 4 h intervals from 12 to 80 h p.i. and at 90, 100, 110 and 120 h p.i. by snipping off a larval proleg. Ten microlitres of haemolymph was mixed with 190 µl PBS in a microfuge tube and centrifuged at 2000 g for 10 min to pellet cells. Subsequently, 100 µl supernatant (equivalent to 5 µl haemolymph) was used for DNA extraction for RTQ-PCR. The supernatant was added to 500 µl lysis buffer [0.6 % (w/v) SDS, 12 mM Tris/HCl (pH 8.0), 12 mM EDTA], incubated overnight at room temperature and stored at –20 °C until DNA extraction. At each time point, haemolymph was collected from six larvae inoculated with MabrNPV alone and from three larvae inoculated with MabrNPV and Tinopal.
DNA preparation for RTQ-PCR.
Viral DNAs were extracted from BVs in the haemolymph of infected insects as described by Schlink & Reski (2002) with some modifications. Specifically, 3 µl of a 4 mg ml–1 solution of RNase A (>100 U ml–1) was added to the haemolymph in lysis buffer and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After cooling to room temperature, 200 µl 4 M ammonium acetate was added and the precipitated proteins were pelleted by centrifugation at 15 000 g for 4 min. In order to precipitate the viral DNAs, 2-propanol (600 µl) and glycogen (1 µl of a 20 mg ml–1 solution) were added to the supernatant. The DNAs were pelleted by centrifugation (15 000 g for 3 min), washed with 70 % ethanol, dried, redissolved in 20 µl sterilized Milli-Q water (Millipore) and stored at –20 °C until use.
Quantification of MabrNPV viral DNA by RTQ-PCR.
RTQ-PCR was performed by using a DNA Engine Opticon 2 System (MJ Research). The reaction mixture (10 µl) contained 4 µl DNA, 5 µl DyNAmo Master Mix with SYBR Green (Finnzymes) and 0.5 µM each MabrNPV polyhedrin primer. The MabrNPV primers (forward primer, 5'-AAATGTTAAGCCCGACACCA-3'; reverse primer, 5'-AGAGCATGTTGAGCCAGGAA-3') were designed on the basis of the polh gene of MabrNPV T5 to amplify a 195 bp product. All of the RTQ-PCRs were carried out under the same conditions: 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 38 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 64 °C for 50 s. Known dilutions of viral DNAs purified as described above from MabrNPV PIBs were used as internal standards for each RTQ-PCR. Agarose-gel electrophoresis and thermal denaturation (melting-curve analysis) were performed to confirm specific replicon formation.
Data analysis.
Probit analysis (Finney, 1978) by using the computer program SPSS, version 11.5.1 (SPSS Inc.), was used to analyse mortality data. A log-normal distribution was assumed for the data of the lethal time. JMP software, version 5.0.1 (SAS Institute, Inc.), was used to determine the significance of differences among survival times by using the parametric survival analysis and to make pairwise comparisons by using the log-rank test of the Kaplan–Meier method with a Bonferroni adjustment (Sokal & Rohlf, 1981). The significance of differences in larval body weights was determined using a Kruskal–Wallis test of the JMP software suite. Pairwise comparisons of larval body weights were also determined by using a Wilcoxon test with a Bonferroni adjustment (Sokal & Rohlf, 1981). The amount of viral DNA in the haemolymph of infected hosts was used to estimate the concentration of BVs by a modified Gompertz model (Zwietering et al., 1990):
|
|
is the intercept of the growth curve with the x axis. This intercept indicates the starting point of viral increase, namely the duration of the time lag between the onset of primary and secondary infection. One copy of viral genomic DNA was calculated to be 1.70x10–7 ng, assuming that the size of the dsDNA genome of MabrNPV is 155 kbp. In this study, the RTQ-PCR detection limit was regarded as a measurement below 10 copies per reaction, i.e. 10 copies (µl haemolymph)–1. Values below the detection limit were regarded as zero in order to calculate the parameters of the Gompertz model. The equation parameters were estimated with the JMP software suite. |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
. All of the trees demonstrated that MabrNPV T5 was a member of the group II NPVs and was related closely to NPVs isolated from Mamestra spp.
|
). Additionally, two point mutations in the middle of the ORF resulted in two frame-shift mutations (Fig. 2c, d). The deduced amino acid sequence of MabrNPV T5 lef-3 showed 98 % identity to the corresponding sequence of MacoNPV B.
|
). In all of the trials, the slopes of the probit mortality lines became steeper with the addition of Tinopal to the inoculum. In the second and third trials, the addition of Tinopal resulted in significantly steeper slopes in comparison with inoculation of MabrNPV alone (parallelism test: 
2=9.50, P=0.002; and 2=19.35, P<0.001, respectively). The addition of Tinopal did not cause any significant change in the slope of the probit mortality line in the first trial (parallelism test: 2=1.83, P=0.176).
|
2=140.9, P<0.01). Following the ‘NPV alone’ treatment, 42.6 % of larvae died during the fifth instar, whereas the remainder died during the sixth instar. Following the ‘NPV+Tinopal’ treatment, all of the larvae died during the sixth instar, and 95.8 % of larvae died during the fifth instar following the ‘high NPV+Tinopal’ treatment.
The body weights of larvae inoculated with MabrNPV alone or a combination of MabrNPV and Tinopal are shown in Fig. 3. The median body weight of control larvae (i.e. no NPV or Tinopal treatment) was 873 mg. The median body weight of larvae treated with Tinopal was 879 mg, indicating that Tinopal was not toxic to larvae. The body weights of larvae inoculated with virus were significantly lower than those of the control or Tinopal-treated larvae. The median body weight of ‘NPV alone’-, ‘NPV+Tinopal’- and ‘high NPV+Tinopal’-treated larvae was 442, 611 and 180 mg, respectively. The body weight of larvae treated with ‘NPV alone’ was significantly lower than that with the ‘NPV+Tinopal’ treatment and significantly higher than that with the ‘high NPV+Tinopal’ treatment.
|
). Three parameters {A, µm and ; the units of these parameters are log10(copies µl–1), [log10(copies µl–1)] h–1, and h, respectively} that determine the shape of the curves were estimated in order to fit the model (Table 2). Following the ‘NPV alone’ treatment, larvae were divided into ‘sixth-instar type’ and ‘fifth-instar type’ at 52 h p.i. and subsequent times, as the larval stage could be distinguished on the basis of head capsule slippage (Fig. 4a). Ecdysis of ‘sixth-instar type’ larvae treated with ‘NPV alone’ and ‘NPV+Tinopal’ was observed at 68 and 72 h p.i. The parameters of the A, µm and values for the ‘NPV alone’ treatment were estimated separately for the ‘sixth-instar type’ and ‘fifth-instar type’ larvae after 52 h p.i., whereas they were determined together before 48 h p.i. Estimates of the A, µm and values for the ‘sixth-instar type’ larvae were 6.14, 0.137 and 15.3, respectively, and 6.69, 0.161 and 17.6, respectively, for the ‘fifth-instar type’ larvae. The BV growth curve following the ‘NPV+Tinopal’ treatment is shown in Fig. 4(b), and estimates of A, µm and were 6.12, 0.145 and 26.5, respectively. The BV growth curve following the ‘high NPV+Tinopal’ treatment is shown in Fig. 4(c), and estimates of A, µm and were 6.35, 0.441 and 18.7, respectively.
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
and Jehle et al. (2006). The phylogenetic analysis of amino acid sequences of the egt gene demonstrated clearly that MabrNPV T was related more closely to MacoNPV B than to MabrNPV Oxford, although their nucleotide sequences showed 99 % identity. We found that differences in the amino acid sequences of EGT of MabrNPV Oxford and the other two NPVs resulted from point mutations within the egt gene of MabrNPV Oxford. These results and our data from shotgun sequencing suggested strongly that MabrNPV T is a genetic variant of MacoNPV B and possibly of MabrNPV Oxford. It is interesting that MabrNPV T isolated from Japan appeared to be related closely to MacoNPV B and MabrNPV Oxford, which were isolated from Canada (Li et al., 2002) and Europe (Doyle et al., 1990), respectively.
We demonstrated that the susceptibility of M. brassicae to MabrNPV was increased dramatically when Tinopal was added to the inoculum. The LD95 values of the three trials varied in a relatively broad range from 4.1x105 to 2.0x106 (4.9-fold) following inoculation with MabrNPV alone, and in a relatively narrow range from 3.7x101 to 7.9x101 (2.1-fold) following inoculation with MabrNPV and Tinopal. These results suggested that the LD95 values of MabrNPV are considerably stable, especially with Tinopal. When larvae were inoculated with MabrNPV alone, the slope of the probit mortality line was flat, suggesting that the larvae were quite variable in their susceptibility to MabrNPV. The differences in weight gain and multiple larval stages (fifth and sixth instar) during which the larvae died were consistent with this variability. In contrast, the steep slope of the probit mortality line following inoculation with MabrNPV and Tinopal suggested that the addition of Tinopal diminished the variability in larval susceptibility. Previous studies (Wang & Granados, 2000; Mukawa et al., 2003; Okuno et al., 2003) have reported that the ingestion of a fluorescent brightener inhibits the formation of the peritrophic membrane, which serves as a barrier to pathogenic micro-organisms of the host midgut. The mechanism of viral enhancement by Tinopal may involve alteration of the peritrophic membrane permeability, allowing a large number of ODVs to reach the midgut epithelium cells (Mukawa et al., 2003; Okuno et al., 2003). In addition, Washburn et al. (1998) suggested that fluorescent brighteners block the sloughing of infected midgut epithelial cells, which results in decreased larval midgut resistance and increased mortality.
We hypothesize that the addition of Tinopal allows primary infection to initiate with the minimum number of ODVs such that a relatively low virus titre can initiate a systemic infection. Following inoculation with ‘NPV+Tinopal’, larvae survived longer, grew heavier and died during the sixth instar, and the haemolymph concentrations of viral DNAs were relatively low, especially during the early stages of infection. In contrast, following the ‘high NPV+Tinopal’ treatment, the lethal time and weight gain were reduced and death occurred during the fifth instar. The concentration of viral DNAs also increased rapidly and reached a plateau within a short period of time. Following inoculation at an LD95 equivalent dose without Tinopal, the concentration of viral DNAs varied widely and could be divided into two groups corresponding to ‘fifth-instar type’ and ‘sixth-instar type’ larvae. These results suggested that the level of viral multiplication in haemolymph is related directly to survival time, weight gain and the stage of death. Therefore, we concluded that Tinopal overcomes the midgut defence against the virus and that the primary infection was initiated uniformly with small numbers in the case of ‘NPV+Tinopal’ inoculation or with large numbers of ODVs in the case of ‘high NPV+Tinopal’ inoculation. The data from the ‘NPV alone’ treatment suggested that the primary infection was initiated with a variable number of ODVs.
In order to estimate the rate of virus multiplication in vivo, we fitted the data of the concentration of MabrNPV genomic DNA in the haemolymph to the modified Gompertz model. Two reports have adopted the Gompertz model to study the multiplication of NPVs (van Beek et al., 2000; Ishii et al., 2002), but a detailed explanation of the biological significance of the three Gompertz parameters (A, µm and ) that determine the shape of the curve has not been discussed. In our study, the parameter, a measure of time lag between the onset of primary and secondary infection, was estimated to be 26.5 and 18.7 h p.i. [with 95 % confidence limits (CL) of 23.2–29.6 and 17.3–20.1 h p.i., respectively] following inoculation with ‘NPV+Tinopal’ or ‘high NPV+Tinopal’, respectively. These results suggested that the secondary infection following inoculation with a minimum number of ODVs started at 23–30 h p.i. and that this period was shortened by over 3 h when infection was initiated with large numbers of ODVs, whilst those of ‘NPV alone’ treatment were estimated with a broad 95 % CL. In the larval tissue of Trichoplusia ni infected with AcMNPV, newly synthesized nucleocapsids can be detected in the cell cytoplasm by electron microscopy as early as 12 h p.i. and BVs are released into the haemocoel by 16–24 h p.i. (Granados & Lawler, 1981). The infection of AcMNPV progresses from the midgut to tracheae of larvae of T. ni at 12–16 h p.i. (Engelhard et al., 1994; Washburn et al., 1995, 2003). These findings indicate that the onset of AcMNPV secondary infection occurs at 12–16 h after virus exposure. Our results suggest that the shift from primary infection to secondary infection takes longer in M. brassicae infected with MabrNPV than in T. ni infected with AcMNPV.
Granados & Lawler (1981) reported that the concentration of AcMNPV in the haemolymph of T. ni larvae reached 109 p.f.u. ml–1 at 24 h p.i. In the haemolymph of Heliothis virescens, the BV titre of AcMNPV has been detected at a level of 108–1010 p.f.u. ml–1 at 48–72 h after oral infection (Trudeau et al., 2001; Kamita et al., 2003). However, there is little information about the final BV concentrations for other baculoviruses in vivo. In this study, the maximum concentration of BV in the host haemolymph, which is represented by the A parameter of the Gompertz model, was estimated at approximately 106 virions µl–1 following all of the treatments. However, the 95 % CL of the A parameter of ‘sixth-instar type’ larvae treated with ‘NPV alone’ and ‘NPV+Tinopal’ were estimated to be 5.53–6.82 and 5.76–6.53, respectively. These estimates suggested that the maximum BV concentration is occasionally <106 virions µl–1. The A parameter of ‘fifth-instar type’ larvae treated with ‘NPV alone’ and ‘high NPV+Tinopal’ was found to be higher, sometimes reaching a BV concentration of 107 virions µl–1.
As shown in Fig. 4
, the concentration of BV reached a plateau at 60–80 h p.i. for the ‘NPV alone’ treatment. The plateau titre appeared to occur later (>90 h p.i.) in the ‘NPV+Tinopal’-treated larvae and sooner (40 h p.i.) in the ‘high NPV+Tinopal’-treated larvae. The time required to reach the plateau titre is related to the µm parameter, the slope of the virus-growth curve during exponential growth. The values of the µm parameter following inoculation with ‘NPV+Tinopal’ and ‘high NPV+Tinopal’ were estimated to be 0.145 and 0.441, respectively. The slope of the Gompertz formula reflects not only the rate of increase per virion, but also the volume of larval haemolymph. In fact, the median body weight of larvae following ‘NPV+Tinopal’ treatment was 3.4-fold higher than that of larvae following ‘high NPV+Tinopal’ treatment. This suppression of larval development following ‘high NPV+Tinopal’ treatment seems to be related to the inhibition of larval moulting and a high rate of viral increase following the early appearance of virus in the haemolymph. Under the same conditions as our experiment, Agui & Hiruma (1982) reported that the ecdysteroid titre in larvae of M. brassicae peaked at 30 h before larval ecdysis to the sixth instar. This period of time corresponds with 38–42 h p.i. in our experiments. At this time, the BV concentration had almost reached a plateau (106 virions µl–1) following the ‘high NPV+Tinopal’ treatment. On the other hand, the BV concentration following ‘NPV+Tinopal’ treatment was below 103 virions µl–1 at the same time. In the former case, larvae stayed in the fifth instar, possibly because the concentration of EGT, a viral protein that inactivates the host ecdysteroid (Cory et al., 2001), was high enough to impede ecdysis, whilst in the latter case larvae moulted to the sixth instar. These results suggest that virus concentration correlates with the expression rate of the viral genes such as egt and regulation of host development.
From our results, we concluded that MabrNPV T is a member of the group II NPVs. We found that when infection initiates from a minimum number of ODVs, it took approximately 25 h before initiation of secondary infection and another 65 h before the maximal concentration of virus (109 virions ml–1) in the host haemocoel was reached. When the initial virus dose was increased, the primary and secondary infection cycles were accelerated. To improve our understanding of the virulence of baculoviruses in vivo, our future work will study the differences in virus multiplication between group I and group II NPVs and granuloviruses in a common permissive host.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Akutsu, K. (1972). The use of viruses for control of vegetable pests. Plant Prot 26, 19–23 (in Japanese).
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215, 403–410.[CrossRef][Medline]
Aruga, H., Yoshitake, N., Watanabe, H. & Hukuhara, T. (1960). Studies on nuclear polyhedrosis and their inductions in some Lepidoptera. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 4, 51–56 (in Japanese).
Bonning, B. C. (2005). Baculoviruses: biology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. In Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, vol. 6, Control, pp. 233–270. Edited by L. I. Gilbert, K. Iatrou & S. S. Gill. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Brown, D. A., Evans, H. F., Allen, C. J. & Kelly, D. C. (1981). Biological and biochemical investigations on five European isolates of Mamestra brassicae nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Arch Virol 69, 209–217.[CrossRef][Medline]
Clarke, E. E., Tristem, M., Cory, J. S. & O'Reilly, D. R. (1996). Characterization of the ecdysteroid UDP-glucosyltransferase gene from Mamestra brassicae nucleopolyhedrovirus. J Gen Virol 77, 2865–2871.
Cory, J. S., Wilson, K. R., Hails, R. S. & O'Reilly, D. R. (2001). Host manipulation by insect pathogens: the effect of the baculovirus egt gene on the host–virus interaction. In Endocrine Interactions of Insect Parasites and Pathogens, pp. 233–244. Edited by J. P. Edwards & R. J. Weaver. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers.
Dai, X., Hajós, J. P., Joosten, N. N., van Oers, M. M., IJkel, W. F. J., Zuidema, D., Pang, Y. & Vlak, J. M. (2000). Isolation of a Spodoptera exigua baculovirus recombinant with a 10.6 kbp genome deletion that retains biological activity. J Gen Virol 81, 2545–2554.
Doyle, C. J., Hirst, M. L., Cory, J. S. & Entwistle, P. F. (1990). Risk assessment studies: detailed host range testing of wild-type cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Appl Environ Microbiol 56, 2704–2710.
Engelhard, E. K., Kam-Morgan, L. N. W., Washburn, J. O. & Volkman, L. E. (1994). The insect tracheal system: a conduit for the systemic spread of Autographa californica M nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91, 3224–3227.
Erlandson, M. A. (1990). Biological and biochemical comparison of Mamestra configurata and Mamestra brassicae nuclear polyhedrosis virus isolates pathogenic for the bertha armyworm, Mamestra configurata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Invertebr Pathol 56, 47–56.[CrossRef]
Evans, H. F. & Allaway, G. P. (1983). Dynamics of baculovirus growth and dispersal in Mamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larval populations introduced into small cabbage plots. Appl Environ Microbiol 45, 493–501.
Evans, H. F., Lomer, C. J. & Kelly, D. C. (1981). Growth of nuclear polyhedrosis virus in larvae of the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae L. Arch Virol 70, 207–214.[CrossRef][Medline]
Finney, D. J. (1978). Statistical Methods in Biological Assay. London: Charles Griffin & Co.
Goto, C., Minobe, Y. & Iizuka, T. (1992). Restriction endonuclease analysis and mapping of the genomes of granulosis viruses isolated from Xestia c-nigrum and five other noctuid species. J Gen Virol 73, 1491–1497.
Granados, R. R. & Lawler, K. A. (1981). In vivo pathway of Autographa californica baculovirus invasion and infection. Virology 108, 297–308.[CrossRef]
Granados, R. R., Lawler, K. A. & Burand, J. P. (1981). Replication of Heliothis zea baculovirus in an insect cell line. Intervirology 16, 71–79.[Medline]
Hall, T. A. (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41, 95–98.
Hara, K., Funakoshi, M., Tsuda, K. & Kawarabata, T. (1994). Susceptibility of lepidopteran cell lines to a Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Appl Entomol Zool 29, 395–402.
Herniou, E. A., Luque, T., Chen, X., Vlak, J. M., Winstanley, D., Cory, J. S. & O'Reilly, D. R. (2001). Use of whole genome sequence data to infer baculovirus phylogeny. J Virol 75, 8117–8126.
Ishii, T., Takatsuka, J., Nakai, M. & Kunimi, Y. (2002). Growth characteristics and competitive abilities of a nucleopolyhedrovirus and an entomopoxvirus in larvae of the smaller tea tortrix, Adoxophyes honmai (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Biol Control 23, 96–105.[CrossRef]
Jehle, J. A., Lange, M., Wang, H., Hu, Z., Wang, Y. & Hauschild, R. (2006). Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of baculoviruses from Lepidoptera. Virology 346, 180–193.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kamita, S. G., Maeda, S. & Hammock, B. D. (2003). High-frequency homologous recombination between baculoviruses involves DNA replication. J Virol 77, 13053–13061.
Kelly, D. C. & Brown, D. A. (1980). Biochemical and biophysical properties of a Mamestra brassicae multiple enveloped nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Arch Virol 66, 133–141.[CrossRef][Medline]
Knudson, D. L. & Tinsley, T. W. (1974). Replication of a nuclear polyhedrosis virus in a continuous cell culture of Spodoptera frugiperda: purification, assay of infectivity, and growth characteristics of the virus. J Virol 14, 934–944.
Kondo, M., Funakoshi, M., Hara, K. & Kawarabata, T. (1995). Replication of a Mamestra brassicae nuclear polyhedrosis virus in a newly established Mamestra brassicae cell line. Acta Virol 39, 137–141.[Medline]
Kunimi, Y. & Yamada, E. (1990). Relationship of larval phase and susceptibility of the armyworm, Pseudaletia separata Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to a nuclear polyhedrosis virus and granulosis virus. Appl Entomol Zool 25, 289–297.
Kunimi, Y. & Fuxa, J. R. (1996). Volumes ingested by four species of noctuids with reference to peroral droplet bioassay of baculoviruses. J Invertebr Pathol 68, 310–311.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lange, M., Wang, H., Zhihong, H. & Jehle, J. A. (2004). Towards a molecular identification and classification system of lepidopteran-specific baculoviruses. Virology 325, 36–47.[CrossRef][Medline]
Li, L., Donly, C., Li, Q., Willis, L. G., Keddie, B. A., Erlandson, M. & Theilmann, D. A. (2002). Identification and genomic analysis of a second species of nucleopolyhedrovirus isolated from Mamestra configurata. Virology 297, 226–244.[CrossRef][Medline]
Li, L., Li, Q., Willis, L. G., Erlandson, M. A., Theilmann, D. A. & Donly, C. (2005). Complete comparative genomic analysis of two field isolates of Mamestra configurata nucleopolyhedrovirus-A. J Gen Virol 86, 91–105.
Lo, H.-R. & Chao, Y.-C. (2004). Rapid titer determination of baculovirus by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnol Prog 20, 354–360.[Medline]
Lung, O. Y., Cruz-Alvarez, M. & Blissard, G. W. (2003). Ac23, an envelope fusion protein homolog in the baculovirus Autographa californica multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus, is a viral pathogenicity factor. J Virol 77, 328–339.
Monsma, S. A., Oomens, A. G. P. & Blissard, G. W. (1996). The GP64 envelope fusion protein is an essential baculovirus protein required for cell-to-cell transmission of infection. J Virol 70, 4607–4616.[Abstract]
Mukawa, S., Nakai, M., Okuno, S., Takatsuka, J. & Kunimi, Y. (2003). Nucleopolyhedrovirus enhancement by a fluorescent brightener in Mythimna separata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Appl Entomol Zool 38, 87–96.[CrossRef]
Nakai, M., Goto, C., Shiotsuki, T. & Kunimi, Y. (2002). Granulovirus prevents pupation and retards development of Adoxophyes honmai larvae. Physiol Entomol 27, 157–164.
Nei, M. & Kumar, S. (2000). Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Okada, M. (1977). Studies on the utilization and mass production of Spodoptera litura nuclear polyhedrosis virus for control of the tobacco cutworm, Spodoptera litura Fabricius. Bull Chugoku Agric Exp Stn Ser E 12, 1–66 (in Japanese). http://rms1.agsearch.agropedia.affrc.go.jp/contents/JASI/pdf/digicon/rreport/report/cgk/cgk1977-E12-1.pdf
Okuno, S., Takatsuka, J., Nakai, M., Ototake, S., Masui, A. & Kunimi, Y. (2003). Viral-enhancing activity of various stilbene-derived brighteners for a Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) nucleopolyhedrovirus. Biol Control 26, 146–152.[CrossRef]
Oomens, A. G. P. & Blissard, G. W. (1999). Requirement for GP64 to drive efficient budding of Autographa californica multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus. Virology 254, 297–314.[CrossRef][Medline]
Riegel, C. I. & Slavicek, J. M. (1997). Characterization of the replication cycle of the Lymantria dispar nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Virus Res 51, 9–17.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rosinski, M., Reid, S. & Nielsen, L. K. (2002). Kinetics of baculovirus replication and release using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnol Bioeng 77, 476–480.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rovesti, L., Crook, N. E. & Winstanley, D. (2000). Biological and biochemical relationships between the nucleopolyhedroviruses of Mamestra brassicae and Heliothis armigera. J Invertebr Pathol 75, 2–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schlink, K. & Reski, R. (2002). Preparing high-quality DNA from moss (Physcomitrella patens). Plant Mol Biol Rep 20, 423a–423f.
Slavicek, J. M., Popham, H. J. R. & Riegel, C. I. (1999). Deletion of the Lymantria dispar multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus ecdysteroid UDP-glucosyl transferase gene enhances viral killing speed in the last instar of the gypsy moth. Biol Control 16, 91–103.
Smith, I. R. L. & Crook, N. E. (1988). In vivo isolation of baculovirus genotypes. Virology 166, 240–244.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1981). Biometry. New York: Freeman.
Sun, X., Chen, X., Zhang, Z., Wang, H., Bianchi, F. J. J. A., Peng, H., Vlak, J. M. & Hu, Z. (2002). Bollworm responses to release of genetically modified Helicoverpa armigera nucleopolyhedroviruses in cotton. J Invertebr Pathol 81, 63–69.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sun, X., Wang, H., Sun, X. & 7 other authors (2004). Biological activity and field efficacy of a genetically modified Helicoverpa armigera single-nucleocapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus expressing an insect-selective toxin from a chimeric promoter. Biol Control 29, 124–137.[CrossRef]
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22, 4673–4680.
Trudeau, D., Washburn, J. O. & Volkman, L. E. (2001). Central role of hemocytes in Autographa californica M nucleopolyhedrovirus pathogenesis in Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa zea. J Virol 75, 996–1003.
Vanarsdall, A. L., Okano, K. & Rohrmann, G. F. (2005). Characterization of the replication of a baculovirus mutant lacking the DNA polymerase gene. Virology 331, 175–180.[CrossRef][Medline]
van Beek, N., Hughes, P. R. & Wood, H. A. (2000). Effects of incubation temperature on the dose–survival time relationship of Trichoplusia ni larvae infected with Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus. J Invertebr Pathol 76, 185–190.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vlak, J. M. & Gröner, A. (1980). Identification of two nuclear polyhedrosis viruses from the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Invertebr Pathol 35, 269–278.[CrossRef]
Wang, P. & Granados, R. R. (2000). Calcofluor disrupts the midgut defense system in insects. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 30, 135–143.[CrossRef][Medline]
Washburn, J. O., Kirkpatrick, B. A. & Volkman, L. E. (1995). Comparative pathogenesis of Autographa californica M nuclear polyhedrosis virus in larvae of Trichoplusia ni and Heliothis virescens. Virology 209, 561–568.[CrossRef][Medline]
Washburn, J. O., Kirkpatrick, B. A., Haas-Stapleton, E. & Volkman, L. E. (1998). Evidence that the stilbene-derived optical brightener M2R enhances Autographa californica M nucleopolyhedrovirus infection of Trichoplusia ni and Heliothis virescens by preventing sloughing of infected midgut epithelial cells. Biol Control 11, 58–69.[CrossRef]
Washburn, J. O., Wong, J. F. & Volkman, L. E. (2001). Comparative pathogenesis of Helicoverpa zea S nucleopolyhedrovirus in noctuid larvae. J Gen Virol 82, 1777–1784.
Washburn, J. O., Trudeau, D., Wong, J. F. & Volkman, L. E. (2003). Early pathogenesis of Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus and Helicoverpa zea single nucleopolyhedrovirus in Heliothis virescens: a comparison of the ‘M’ and ‘S’ strategies for establishing fatal infection. J Gen Virol 84, 343–351.
Williams, G. V. & Faulkner, P. (1997). Cytological changes and viral morphogenesis during baculovirus infection. In The Baculoviruses, pp. 61–108. Edited by L. K. Miller. New York: Plenum.
Zanotto, P. M. de A., Kessing, B. D. & Maruniak, J. E. (1993). Phylogenetic interrelationships among baculoviruses: evolutionary rates and host associations. J Invertebr Pathol 62, 147–164.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zwietering, M. H., Jongenburger, I., Rombouts, F. M. & van 't Riet, K. (1990). Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Appl Environ Microbiol 56, 1875–1881.
Received 23 January 2006;
accepted 6 February 2006.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Mukawa and C. Goto In vivo characterization of two granuloviruses in larvae of Mythimna separata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) J. Gen. Virol., April 1, 2008; 89(4): 915 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
, Data from larvae in fifth instar before moulting stage; 
, data from larvae in fifth moulting stage or sixth instar. Solid lines indicate the fitting curve estimated from the modified Gompertz model. Dotted lines indicate the 95 % CL of the regression curves. For the ‘NPV alone’ treatment, the growth curves were estimated from ‘sixth-instar type’ [a(i)] and ‘fifth-instar type’ [a(ii)] data, respectively.