J Gen Virol Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 87 (2006), 1635-1642; DOI 10.1099/vir.0.81629-0

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singethan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider-Schaulies, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singethan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider-Schaulies, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Singethan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider-Schaulies, J.
© 2006 Society for General Microbiology

CD9-dependent regulation of Canine distemper virus-induced cell–cell fusion segregates with the extracellular domain of the haemagglutinin

K. Singethan1, E. Topfstedt1, S. Schubert1, W. P. Duprex2, B. K. Rima2 and Jürgen Schneider-Schaulies1

1 Institut für Virologie und Immunbiologie, Versbacher Straße 7, D-97078 Würzburg, Germany
2 School of Biomedical Sciences, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK

Correspondence
Jürgen Schneider-Schaulies
jss{at}vim.uni-wuerzburg.de


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Antibodies to CD9, a member of the tetraspan transmembrane-protein family, selectively inhibit Canine distemper virus (CDV)-induced cell–cell fusion. Neither CDV-induced virus–cell fusion nor cell–cell fusion induced by the closely related morbillivirus Measles virus (MV) is affected by anti-CD9 antibodies. As CDV does not bind CD9, an unknown, indirect mechanism is responsible for the observed inhibition of cell–cell fusion. It was investigated whether this effect was restricted to only one viral glycoprotein, either the haemagglutinin (H) or the fusion (F) protein, which form a fusion complex on the surface of virions and infected cells, or whether it is dependent on both in transient co-transfection assays. The susceptibility to CD9 antibodies segregates with the H protein of CDV. By exchanging portions of the H proteins of CDV and MV, it was determined that the complete extracellular domain, including the predicted stem structure (stem 1, barrel strand 1 and stem 2) and globular head domain, of the CDV-H protein mediates the effect. This suggests that interaction of the CDV-H protein with an unknown cellular receptor(s) is regulated by CD9, rather than F protein-mediated membrane fusion.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Canine distemper virus (CDV) causes a highly contagious disease in carnivores that has many similarities to human measles. Mortality rates following CDV infection vary with the host species and range from 0 % in domestic cats to approximately 50 % in domestic dogs and 100 % in ferrets. Encephalomyelitis is the most common cause of death in infected animals. Like measles, canine distemper infections are associated with transient immunosuppression that enhances morbidity and mortality levels due to opportunistic infections (Appel & Gillespie, 1972Down; Summers & Appel, 1994Down; Vandevelde & Zurbriggen, 1995Down). Recently, CD150 (SLAM) has been described as a cellular receptor for wild-type CDV (Tatsuo & Yanagi, 2002Down; Seki et al., 2003Down) and recombinant wild-type CDV has a similar tropism in ferrets as does Measles virus (MV) in humans (von Messling et al., 2004Down). However, as CDV readily infects epithelial cells and cells in the central nervous system, which are SLAM-negative (McQuaid & Cosby, 2002Down), it is likely that wild-type CDV uses additional receptors. Syncytium-forming and non-syncytium-forming strains of CDV have been isolated. The capacity to form syncytia in tissue culture appears to correlate with the attenuation of the viruses in natural hosts (Zurbriggen et al., 1995Down; von Messling et al., 2003Down). Infection and syncytium formation by the attenuated vaccine strain Onderstepoort in tissue culture do not depend on the expression of SLAM on target cells and, although SLAM improves its infectivity (Tatsuo et al., 2001Down), it is known that this strain and other tissue culture-adapted strains of CDV utilize additional, as-yet-unidentified receptors (Löffler et al., 1997Down).

We have shown that a mAb directed against CD9 (mAb K41) inhibits CDV-induced cell–cell fusion, but not virus–cell fusion (Schmid et al., 2000Down). However, direct binding of CDV to CD9 could not be demonstrated, suggesting that CD9 is not a receptor for CDV and that the effect on virus-induced cell–cell fusion is mediated via other cellular molecules. CD9 is a member of the tetraspanin transmembrane-protein (TM4) superfamily, which includes CD37, CD53, CD63, CD81, CD82 and CD151. These proteins form microdomains with a variety of other cell-surface receptors in the cell membrane (Hemler, 2003Down). CD9 has also been discussed as a possible cellular receptor for Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) (Willett et al., 1994Down). Similar to CDV, the infection of cells with FIV is inhibited by antibodies to CD9 in a step occurring after virus uptake (de Parseval et al., 1997Down; Willett et al., 1997Down). In contrast to our findings with CDV, these authors suggested that the release of FIV is affected by anti-CD9 antibodies. Another member of the TM4 superfamily, CD82, was identified to be involved in syncytium formation by human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) (Imai et al., 1992Down). Similar to our findings for CDV, neither a direct binding of FIV to feline CD9 nor of HTLV-1 to CD82 was demonstrated, again suggesting indirect functions of these two members of the TM4 family in virus release and cell-to-cell spread.

The efficiency of morbillivirus-induced cell fusion and virus release is influenced by the viral envelope proteins: the haemagglutinin (H), fusion (F) and matrix (M) proteins. Interacting with cellular receptors, the H protein determines the tropism and cytopathogenicity (von Messling et al., 2001Down). When cells are co-transfected with plasmids that express combinations of the H and F proteins of various CDV strains, the H protein determines the extent of cell–cell fusion. For MV, it has been demonstrated that mutations in the cytoplasmic domains of the H and F proteins (Cathomen et al., 1998aDown) and also the M protein influence the capacity of the virus to induce cell fusion, as a virus that does not express the M protein induced enhanced levels of cell–cell fusion (Cathomen et al., 1998bDown). In the light of these findings, we wanted to define the molecular basis of the anti-CD9 regulation of CDV-induced cell–cell fusion. Here, we describe that the CDV-H protein alone mediates the susceptibility to CD9 antibodies and that this effect is exerted by the extracellular domain of H.


   METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Cells, viruses and antibodies.
Vero cells (African green monkey; ATCC CRL 6318) were cultured in minimal essential medium (MEM) containing 5 % fetal calf serum (FCS), penicillin and streptomycin. CDV strain Onderstepoort large plaque (OND-LP) and MV strain Edmonston (MV-Edm) were propagated in Vero cells. The mouse mAbs of clones K41 against CD9, 9E2 against the CDV-H protein and L77 against MV-H were produced in our laboratory. Hybridoma cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium and mAbs were purified by protein G-affinity chromatography. A polyclonal rabbit antiserum raised against 15 aa in the cytoplasmic domain of MV-H (H2N-SPQRDRINAFYKDNC-CONH2) was purchased from Eurogentec and the serum against 15 aa of the CDV-H cytoplasmic domain was a gift of Dr R. Cattaneo, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA (von Messling et al., 2001Down). Secondary antibodies goat anti-mouse and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)- and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit were obtained from DAKO and Immunotech.

Cloning expression plasmids for viral envelope proteins.
The plasmids used for transfection of target cells were: pCG-CDV-H and pCG-CDV-F expressing the H and F proteins of CDV-OND-LP, pCG-MV-H and pCG-MV-F expressing the H and F proteins of MV-Edm, pCG-RPV-F expressing the F protein of the avirulent rinderpest virus (RPV) strain RBOK and pCG-F5804 expressing the F protein of the wild-type CDV strain 5804 (a gift of Dr V. von Messling, Montreal, Canada) (von Messling et al., 2001Down).

Restriction sites for XbaI and EcoRV were introduced at nucleotide positions 1686 and 2121, respectively, and the XbaI site at position 2691 was destroyed in pCG-CDV-H by using a site-directed mutagenesis kit (Invitrogen) by exchanging 1 or 2 nt according to the manufacturer's instructions. The nucleotide exchanges were chosen so that the amino acid sequences remained unchanged. The resulting plasmid was named pCG-CDV-H-XE. An EcoRV site was introduced into the plasmid pCG-MV-H at position 2010 by using the same method and the resulting plasmid was named pCG-MV-H-XE. The plasmids pCG-CDV-H-XE and pCG-MV-H-XE were taken to exchange the domains using the single restriction sites for BamHI, XbaI, EcoRV and SphI as described in Results (Fig. 3Down). The correct sequences of all clones were confirmed by sequencing using an ABI Prism 310 genetic analyser (Perkin-Elmer).


Figure 3
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Construction and expression of chimaeric MV/CDV-H proteins. (a) In the plasmid pCG-CDV-H, restriction sites for XbaI and EcoRV were introduced and the existing site for XbaI was destroyed. In the plasmid pCG-MV-H, an EcoRV site was introduced. The resulting plasmids were called pCG-CDV-H-XE and pCG-MV-H-XE, respectively. Potential (open circles) and used (grey circles) N-glycosylation sites are indicated. In the chimaeric constructs CH-1 to CH-6, the domains were exchanged as indicated. (b) Western blot of Vero cell lysates transiently transfected with constructs CH-1 to CH-6 (lanes 1–6), pCG-MV-H (lane 7) and pCG-CDV-H (lane 8). The Western blots of lanes 1, 5, 6 and 7 were developed by using an MV-H cytoplasmic tail-specific rabbit antiserum, and blots of lanes 2, 3, 4 and 8 by using a CDV-H cytoplasmic tail-specific rabbit antiserum. (c) Analysis of the cell-surface expression, 24 h after transfection, of the plasmids expressing CDV-H-XE, MV-H-XE, chimaeras CH-1 to CH-6 and the parental CDV-H and MV-H proteins by flow cytometry. mAb 9E2 was used for the globular headof CDV and mAb L77 for the globular head of MV, as indicated. Values of the mean fluorescence intensities are givenin parentheses. Controls are cells transfected without plasmid and processed with mAbs 9E2 and L77.

 
Western blotting.
Cells (1x106) were lysed in protein sample buffer (100 µl) and separated on 10 % polyacrylamide gels by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were semi-dry-blotted onto nitrocellulose. Western blots were blocked with 5 % dried milk in PBS containing 0.05 % Tween 20 and incubated with polyclonal antisera to CDV-H or MV-H (1 : 500) and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (1 : 2000; Immunotech). Proteins were visualized by using the ECL system (Amersham Biosciences).

Flow cytometry.
Flow-cytometric analyses were performed as described previously (Schneider-Schaulies et al., 1995Down). Briefly, cells (1x105) were incubated for 1 h on ice with 1 µg mAb in 100 µl FACS buffer (PBS containing 0.4 % BSA and 0.02 % sodium azide). Cells were washed twice in FACS buffer and incubated with 200 µl of a 1 : 100 dilution of FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin on ice for a further 1 h. After three washes with FACS buffer, flow-cytometric analysis was performed on a FACScan (Becton Dickinson).

Quantification of cell–cell fusion.
Vero cells (3x105) in a six-well plate were transfected with H- and F-expressing plasmids (1 µg each) with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) and incubated for 24 h (or as indicated) at 37 °C. In the case of addition of mAb K41, it was added to the medium at indicated concentrations after transfection. Phase-contrast photomicrographs were taken of random regions by using a x20 objective with a digital camera (Leica). The number of nuclei in syncytia was counted and the mean number of nuclei in syncytia per well was calculated from several experiments.


   RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Anti-CD9 antibodies inhibit the cell–cell fusion induced by both CDV infection and plasmid-directed co-expression of CDV-H and -F proteins
When Vero cells were infected with CDV-OND or MV-Edm, large syncytia were seen 24 h and 48 h after infection, respectively (Fig. 1a, cDown). As described previously (Löffler et al., 1997Down; Schmid et al., 2000Down), antibodies to CD9 (mAb K41) effectively inhibit the syncytium formation induced by infection of cells with CDV-OND (Fig. 1bDown). In contrast, syncytium formation induced by MV-Edm is not affected by CD9 antibodies (Fig. 1dDown).


Figure 1
View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Syncytium formation and inhibition with CD9 antibodies of virus-infected cells and cells transfected with expression plasmids for viral H and F proteins. Inhibition of CDV-induced cell fusion, but not MV-induced cell fusion, by anti-CD9 antibodies (a–d). Vero cells were infected with CDV-OND-LP for 24 h (a, b) or MV-Edm for 48 h (c, d) at an m.o.i. of 0.1 and incubated in the absence (a, c) or presence (b, d) ofmAb K41 against CD9 (15 µg ml–1). Vero cells were transfected with pCG-CDV-H and pCG-CDV-F (e–h) and syncytium formation was observed after 24 h in the absence (e)or presence of increasing concentrations (f–h) of mAb K41. Syncytium formation in non-transfected cells (i) and cells transfected with pCG-MV-H and -F in the absence (j) and presence (k) of mAb K41 was evaluated also after 24 h (magnification x20). Numbers of nuclei in CDV-H- and -F-induced syncytia (e–h) were counted andmean numbers are given in (l), showing dependence on the concentration of mAb K41.

 
In order to determine whether the CD9 antibody effect is mediated through interactions with the envelope glycoproteins H and F in the absence of other viral proteins, expression plasmids of the corresponding envelope proteins of CDV and MV were co-transfected into Vero cells. We first tested whether the same effect as is found in infected cells can be demonstrated in transient co-transfection assays with plasmids expressing the H and F proteins of CDV (CDV-OND-LP; Fig. 1eUp–h). Transfection of cells induced large syncytia, which were reduced in size in the presence of mAb K41. The level of inhibition with increasing concentrations of K41 was quantified based on the mean number of nuclei per syncytium (Fig. 1lUp). Transfection of cells with plasmids expressing MV-H and MV-F also induced the formation of very large syncytia. However, in contrast to the CDV envelope proteins, syncytium formation was not inhibited by mAb K41 (Fig. 1j, kUp; Table 1Down). These data demonstrate that CD9 antibodies specifically affect the functionality of the CDV envelope proteins H and F in the fusion assay and that the M protein and other viral proteins are not required.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Syncytium formation and inhibition by anti-CD9 mAb K41 in Vero cells transfected with expression plasmids for H and F proteins of various morbilliviruses

Numbers of nuclei in syncytia were counted 24 h after transfection of Vero cells for each well. The mean was calculated using data from several individual experiments as indicated.

 
Regulation by anti-CD9 antibodies segregates with the CDV-H protein
In order to find out whether the inhibitory effect of CD9 antibodies on virus-induced cell–cell fusion is mediated via the CDV-H or the CDV-F protein, Vero cells were co-transfected with combinations of expression plasmids encoding H and F of other morbilliviruses and a wild-type CDV (Fig. 2Down). The combinations of CDV-H with MV-F, RPV-F and wild-type CDV-F (CDV5804-F) were inhibited less effectively (46–67 %) than the CDV-H/CDV-F combination (83 %), whereas the combinations containing MV-H were not inhibited at all. Mean numbers of nuclei and percentages of inhibition by mAb K41 are shown in Table 1Up. These results demonstrate that, predominantly, the CDV-H protein mediates the susceptibility to the anti-CD9 antibody. In contrast, CDV-F can be substituted by F proteins of other morbilliviruses and the effect is still observed, although modulated by the various F proteins.


Figure 2
View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of anti-CD9 antibodies on syncytium formation induced by combinations of H and F proteins from various morbilliviruses. Vero cells were transfected with the combinations of expression plasmids for MV-H and CDV-F (a, b), CDV-H and MV-F (c, d), CDV-H and RPV-F (e, f) and CDV-H and CDV5804-F (g, h). Cells were incubated for 24 h in the absence (a, c, e, g) or presence (b, d, f, h) of mAb K41 to CD9 (magnification x20).

 
The extracellular domain of CDV-H mediates the anti-CD9 effect
In order to investigate whether the anti-CD9 effect is dependent on the cytoplasmic tail of CDV-H, which contains transport signals (Moll et al., 2001Down), and whether it is mediated via signals from within the cell or whether the ectodomain of the H protein important for the dimerization (Plemper et al., 2000Down) and interacting with cellular receptors on the surface of cells (Langedijk et al., 1997Down; Massé et al., 2004Down) may play a decisive role, we generated chimaeric H proteins by exchanging parts of CDV-H and MV-H. To facilitate these exchanges, we introduced and ablated restriction sites. Nucleotide exchanges were chosen so that they did not change the amino acid sequences of the CDV-H and MV-H proteins. Three component domains of the H proteins, namely (i) the cytoplasmic plus transmembrane domain (residues 1–58), (ii) the stem structure (stem 1+barrel strand 1+stem 2; residues 59–227) and (iii) the remaining residues in the globular head domains of the CDV-H and MV-H proteins were exchanged (Langedijk et al., 1997Down). XbaI and EcoRV restriction sites were introduced as described in Methods. The four restriction sites BamHI, XbaI, EcoRV and SphI were used to exchange the domains (Fig. 3aUp). Expression plasmids with mutated restriction sites, pCG-CDV-H-XE and pCG-MV-H-XE, and those encoding chimaeric H proteins with exchanged domains were generated and designated pCG-CH-1 to -CH-6 as indicated (Fig. 3aUp). The sequences of all plasmids were confirmed by sequencing.

Total expression levels of the chimaeras were examined by Western blotting using polyclonal sera raised against 15 aa of the cytoplasmic tails of MV-H or CDV-H. The MV-specific serum was used to detect CH-1, CH-5, CH-6 and MV-H and the CDV-specific serum was used to detect CH-2, CH-3, CH-4 and CDV-H. The findings demonstrate that all chimaeric H proteins were expressed at similar levels (Fig. 3bUp). The molecular masses vary depending on the number of N-glycosylation sites and the slightly longer globular head domain of MV-H. As shown in Fig. 3(a)Up, MV-H has four N-glycosylation sites in the XbaI–EcoRV fragment at amino acid positions 168, 187, 200 and 215 (Hu et al., 1994Down), whereas CDV-H has one site in this domain and one in the globular head domain, at amino acid positions 149 and 422 (Iwatsuki et al., 2000Down).

The presence of the H proteins on the cell surface was assessed by flow cytometry using mAbs to CDV-H (9E2) or MV-H (L77). We have previously mapped the mAb-binding site of L77 to positions 377–378 by escape mutations (Liebert et al., 1994Down; Moeller et al., 2001Down). The recombinant proteins CDV-H-XE and MV-H-XE (Fig. 3cUp) were expressed on the surface of transfected cells at levels similar to those of the transiently transfected parental CDV-H (OND-LP) and MV-H (Edm) proteins (not shown) and the chimaeric constructs (Fig. 3cUp). The finding that mAb 9E2 to CDV-H binds well to CH-2 indicates that its epitope, like that of mAb L77, is located in the globular head. The epitopes recognized by the mAbs are conformational and were also detected in the chimaeric molecules. This suggests that the conformation of the globular head of the chimaeric proteins is similar to those of the parental CDV-H and MV-H proteins and that the domain switches do not affect the recognized structure adversely.

We then tested the ability of the mutated and chimaeric haemagglutinins to induce syncytium formation and to be inhibited by mAb K41. After transfection of cells with plasmids encoding CDV-H-XE, MV-H-XE, CH-1 and CH-4 in combination with CDV-F, syncytia were formed (Fig. 4Down). In contrast, transfection of plasmids encoding CH-2, CH-3, CH-5 and CH-6, the chimaeras with heterologous ectodomains, did not lead to syncytium formation (not shown), which indicates that these heterologous extracellular domains are non-functional. When we tested the effect of the anti-CD9 mAb, we found that the syncytium formation induced by CDV-H-XE and CH-1 containing the ectodomain of CDV was inhibited, whereas the syncytium formation induced by CH-4 containing the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domain of CDV and the ectodomain of MV was not inhibited. The syncytia formed by this recombinant were smaller and developed more slowly than those induced by the parental molecules. However, there was clearly no inhibitory effect by the anti-CD9 antibody (Fig. 4e, fDown). Numbers of nuclei in syncytia and percentages of inhibition by mAb K41 are given in Table 2Down. Similar results were obtained when the parental and chimaeric H proteins were co-transfected with MV-F instead of CDV-F (not shown).


Figure 4
View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of anti-CD9 antibodies on syncytium formation induced by chimaeric H proteins in combination with CDV-F. As a control, cells were co-transfected with plasmids pCG-CDV-H-XE and pCG-CDV-F in the absence (a) and presence (b) of mAb K41. Plasmids expressing chimaeras CH-1 and CH-4 were also co-transfected with pCG-CDV-F and the formation of syncytia was observed in the absence (c, e) and presence (d, f) of anti-CD9 antibodies. Transfected cultures were incubated for 24 h (a–d) and 48 h (e, f). The relatively small syncytia in (e) and (f) (magnification x20) are shown enlarged in (e') and (f').

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Expression, cell fusion and sensitivity of cell fusion to anti-CD9 mAb K41 of CDV-H-XE, MV-H-XE and CDV-H/MV-H chimaeras

Numbers of nuclei in syncytia were counted after 24 h in the case of CDV-H-XE, MV-H-XE and CH-1, and after 48 h for CH-2 to CH-6. ND, Not determined.

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
We reported previously that antibodies to CD9 specifically inhibit CDV-induced cell–cell fusion, but not virus–cell fusion, and that CDV does not interact directly with CD9 (Löffler et al., 1997Down; Schmid et al., 2000Down). The antibody-induced inhibition of cell–cell fusion is virus-specific, as only CDV-induced cell fusion, but not cell fusion induced by other viruses such as MV (Fig. 1Up) or Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (not shown), is affected. This suggested that one of the viral envelope-associated proteins of CDV involved in membrane fusion may interact specifically with an anti-CD9-regulated molecule. The anti-CD9-mediated regulation of cell–cell fusion might occur via signal transduction or via a direct molecular interaction with membrane-associated host-cell molecules. However, as the antibody concentrations necessary for inhibition of fusion are relatively high (in the range of 5–15 µg ml–1), it is more likely that direct interactions are involved. There are several possibilities for how the anti-CD9 regulation may influence fusogenicity: the cellular molecule on which CD9 acts may influence cell fusion as a receptor for H, as enhancer/inhibitor of the F protein-mediated membrane fusion or as enhancer/inhibitor of the H–F or the H–F–M protein interaction. To come a step closer to answering the question of by which mechanism the inhibition of cell fusion may occur, we investigated which viral protein(s) is/are involved. By using transient-transfection assays, we have shown that the CDV-H protein determines the susceptibility of cell–cell fusion to anti-CD9 antibodies. The effect is modulated by the associated F protein, which may reflect variations in the strength or efficiency of the interaction between the CDV-H and F proteins of various origins.

The predicted structures of the MV-H and the CDV-H proteins are similar (Langedijk et al., 1997Down). It was therefore possible to exchange regions of the H proteins and to generate chimaeric molecules in order to determine which part of the molecule determined the inhibitory effect of the anti-CD9 antibody for CDV. Although all chimaeric H proteins were expressed at similar levels on the surface of cells, not all combinations supported cell–cell fusion. Non-functional chimaeras were CH-2, CH-3, CH-5 and CH-6, all of which are chimaeras with the stem structure and the globular head domain coming from different viruses. Thus, these combinations appear to lead to non-functional conformations either not recognizing the cellular receptors or lacking the proper conformation for the H–F interaction required for successful fusion (Wild et al., 1991Down). In contrast, chimaeras in which complete ectodomains are coupled to the combined cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of the other virus are functional and induce cell–cell fusion in the presence of the F proteins of both CDV and MV. The cell–cell fusion induced by CH-1, containing the ectodomain of CDV, was inhibited by antibodies to CD9, whereas that induced by CH-4, containing the ectodomain of MV, was not. Thus, the extracellular domains of the H protein of CDV are necessary and sufficient to mediate the anti-CD9 modulation of cell–cell fusion. Our data suggest that the interaction of H with an unknown cellular receptor is affected and that CD9 antibodies regulate the activity and/or the spatial expression pattern of this receptor. This may occur by transport of the putative receptor to areas of the membrane that support virus–cell fusion (e.g. the upper surface of the cell, exposed to the medium), but not cell–cell fusion (e.g. the cell–cell contact areas), which would render the receptors inaccessable to the H proteins expressed on the cell surface of neighbouring cells.

Tetraspanin-family molecules are cell type-specifically organized in membrane microdomains with several other receptors, such as integrins and heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (Hemler, 2003Down). CD9 plays a role in cell-fusion events in the absence of viruses and is involved in organogenesis (Hemler, 2003Down). It modulates the fusion of blood monocytes during the genesis of osteoclasts (Tanio et al., 1999Down), is involved in the fusion of myoblasts (Tachibana & Hemler, 1999Down) and regulates the fusion of gametes (Kaji et al., 2000Down; Le Naour et al., 2000Down; Miyado et al., 2000Down). The mechanism of CD9-induced regulation of receptor activity or distribution may also play an important role in these cellular processes. Further work is required to identify the receptor and the associated mechanism.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and a Medical Research Council programme grant (G9901004) for financial support.


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Appel, M. J. G. & Gillespie, J. H. (1972). Canine distemper virus. Virol Monogr 11, 1–96.

Cathomen, T., Naim, H. Y. & Cattaneo, R. (1998a). Measles viruses with altered envelope protein cytoplasmic tails gain cell fusion competence. J Virol 72, 1224–1234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cathomen, T., Mrkic, B., Spehner, D., Drillien, R., Naef, R., Pavlovic, J., Aguzzi, A., Billeter, M. A. & Cattaneo, R. (1998b). A matrix-less measles virus is infectious and elicits extensive cell fusion: consequences for propagation in the brain. EMBO J 17, 3899–3908.[CrossRef][Medline]

de Parseval, A., Lerner, D. L., Borrow, P., Willett, B. J. & Elder, J. H. (1997). Blocking of feline immunodeficiency virus infection by a monoclonal antibody to CD9 is via inhibition of virus release rather than interference with receptor binding. J Virol 71, 5742–5749.[Abstract]

Hemler, M. E. (2003). Tetraspanin proteins mediate cellular penetration, invasion, and fusion events and define a novel type of membrane microdomain. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 19, 397–422.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hu, A., Cattaneo, R., Schwartz, S. & Norrby, E. (1994). Role of N-linked oligosaccharide chains in the processing and antigenicity of measles virus haemagglutinin protein. J Gen Virol 75, 1043–1052.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Imai, T., Fukudome, K., Takagi, S., Nagira, M., Furuse, M., Fukuhara, N., Nishimura, M., Himuma, Y. & Yoshie, O. (1992). C33 antigen recognized by monoclonal antibodies inhibitory to human T cell leukemia virus type 1-induced syncytium formation is a member of a new family of transmembrane proteins including CD9, CD37, CD53, and CD63. J Immunol 149, 2879–2886.[Abstract]

Iwatsuki, K., Tokiyoshi, S., Hirayama, N., Nakamura, K., Ohashi, K., Wakasa, C., Mikami, T. & Kai, C. (2000). Antigenic differences in the H proteins of canine distemper viruses. Vet Microbiol 71, 281–286.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kaji, K., Oda, S., Shikano, T., Ohnuki, T., Uematsu, Y., Sakagami, J., Tada, N., Miyazaki, S. & Kudo, A. (2000). The gamete fusion process is defective in eggs of Cd9-deficient mice. Nat Genet 24, 279–282.[CrossRef][Medline]

Langedijk, J. P. M., Daus, F. J. & van Oirschot, J. T. (1997). Sequence and structure alignment of Paramyxoviridae attachment proteins and discovery of enzymatic activity for a morbillivirus hemagglutinin. J Virol 71, 6155–6167.[Abstract]

Le Naour, F., Rubinstein, E., Jasmin, C., Prenant, M. & Boucheix, C. (2000). Severely reduced female fertility in CD9-deficient mice. Science 287, 319–321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liebert, U. G., Flanagan, S. G., Löffler, S., Baczko, K., ter Meulen, V. & Rima, B. K. (1994). Antigenic determinants of measles virus hemagglutinin associated with neurovirulence. J Virol 68, 1486–1493.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Löffler, S., Lottspeich, F., Lanza, F., Azorsa, D. O., ter Meulen, V. & Schneider-Schaulies, J. (1997). CD9, a tetraspan transmembrane protein, renders cells susceptible to canine distemper virus. J Virol 71, 42–49.[Abstract]

Massé, N., Ainouze, M., Néel, B., Wild, T. F., Buckland, R. & Langedijk, J. P. M. (2004). Measles virus (MV) hemagglutinin: evidence that attachment sites for MV receptors SLAM and CD46 overlap on the globular head. J Virol 78, 9051–9063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McQuaid, S. & Cosby, S. L. (2002). An immunohistochemical study of the distribution of the measles virus receptors, CD46 and SLAM, in normal human tissues and subacute sclerosing panencephalitis. Lab Invest 82, 403–409.[Medline]

Miyado, K., Yamada, G., Yamada, S. & 9 other authors (2000). Requirement of CD9 on the egg plasma membrane for fertilization. Science 287, 321–324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moeller, K., Duffy, I., Duprex, P. & 7 other authors (2001). Recombinant measles viruses expressing altered hemagglutinin (H) genes: functional separation of mutations determining H antibody escape from neurovirulence. J Virol 75, 7612–7620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moll, M., Klenk, H.-D., Herrler, G. & Maisner, A. (2001). A single amino acid change in the cytoplasmic domains of measles virus glycoproteins H and F alters targeting, endocytosis, and cell fusion in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J Biol Chem 276, 17887–17894.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Plemper, R. K., Hammond, A. L. & Cattaneo, R. (2000). Characterization of a region of the measles virus hemagglutinin sufficient for its dimerization. J Virol 74, 6485–6493.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schmid, E., Zurbriggen, A., Gassen, U., Rima, B., ter Meulen, V. & Schneider-Schaulies, J. (2000). Antibodies to CD9, a tetraspan transmembrane protein, inhibit canine distemper virus-induced cell-cell fusion but not virus-cell fusion. J Virol 74, 7554–7561.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schneider-Schaulies, J., Schnorr, J.-J., Brinckmann, U., Dunster, L. M., Baczko, K., Liebert, U. G., Schneider-Schaulies, S. & ter Meulen, V. (1995). Receptor usage and differential downregulation of CD46 by measles virus wild-type and vaccine strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92, 3943–3947.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Seki, F., Ono, N., Yamaguchi, R. & Yanagi, Y. (2003). Efficient isolation of wild strains of canine distemper virus in Vero cells expressing canine SLAM (CD150) and their adaptibility to marmoset B95a cells. J Virol 77, 9943–9950.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Summers, B. A. & Appel, M. J. G. (1994). Aspects of canine distemper virus and measles virus encephalomyelitis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 20, 525–534.[Medline]

Tachibana, I. & Hemler, M. E. (1999). Role of transmembrane 4 superfamily (TM4SF) proteins CD9 and CD81 in muscle cell fusion and myotube maintenance. J Cell Biol 146, 893–904.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tanio, Y., Yamazaki, H., Kunisada, T., Miyake, K. & Hayashi, S.-I. (1999). CD9 molecule expressed on stromal cells is involved in osteoclastogenesis. Exp Hematol 27, 853–859.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tatsuo, H. & Yanagi, Y. (2002). The morbillivirus receptor SLAM (CD150). Microbiol Immunol 46, 135–142.[Medline]

Tatsuo, H., Ono, N. & Yanagi, Y. (2001). Morbilliviruses use signaling lymphocyte activation molecules (CD150) as cellular receptors. J Virol 75, 5842–5850.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vandevelde, M. & Zurbriggen, A. (1995). The neurobiology of canine distemper virus infection. Vet Microbiol 44, 271–280.[CrossRef][Medline]

von Messling, V., Zimmer, G., Herrler, G., Haas, L. & Cattaneo, R. (2001). The hemagglutinin of canine distemper virus determines tropism and cytopathogenicity. J Virol 75, 6418–6427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

von Messling, V., Springfeld, C., Devaux, P. & Cattaneo, R. (2003). A ferret model of canine distemper virus virulence and immunosuppression. J Virol 77, 12579–12591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

von Messling, V., Milosevic, D. & Cattaneo, R. (2004). Tropism illuminated: lymphocyte-based pathways blazed by lethal morbillivirus through the host immune system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 14216–14221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wild, T. F., Malvoisin, E. & Buckland, R. (1991). Measles virus: both the haemagglutinin and fusion glycoproteins are required for fusion. J Gen Virol 72, 439–442.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Willett, B. J., Hosie, M. J., Jarrett, O. & Neil, J. C. (1994). Identification of a putative cellular receptor for feline immunodeficiency virus as the feline homologue of CD9. Immunology 81, 228–233.[Medline]

Willett, B., Hosie, M., Shaw, A. & Neil, J. (1997). Inhibition of feline immunodeficiency virus infection by CD9 antibody operates after virus entry and is independent of virus tropism. J Gen Virol 78, 611–618.[Abstract]

Zurbriggen, A., Graber, H. U., Wagner, A. & Vandevelde, M. (1995). Canine distemper virus persistence in the nervous system is associated with noncytolytic selective virus spread. J Virol 69, 1678–1686.[Abstract]

Received 24 October 2005; accepted 13 February 2006.



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singethan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider-Schaulies, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singethan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider-Schaulies, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Singethan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider-Schaulies, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS