|
|
||||||||

1 Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire RG20 7NN, UK
2 UMR INRA-ENVT 1225, ENVT, 31076 Toulouse cedex 3, France
3 Institut für Virologie, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559 Hannover, Germany
Correspondence
J.-F. Valarcher
jean-francois.valarcher{at}comhem.se
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
p27) or with rBRSV108/109, which contains two amino acid substitutions in FCS-2 (RANN109). Although replication of the mutant viruses and the parental wild-type (WT) rBRSV in the lungs was similar, the extent of gross and microscopic lesions induced by the mutant viruses was less than that induced by WT rBRSV. Furthermore, the numbers of eosinophils in the lungs of calves infected with the mutant viruses were significantly less than that in calves infected with WT virus. These observations suggest a role for the virokinin in the pathogenesis of BRSV infection. Following mucosal immunization with rBRSV
p27, the levels of BRSV-specific serum antibodies were similar to those induced by WT virus. In contrast, the level of neutralizing antibodies induced by rBRSV108/109 was 10-fold lower than that induced by WT virus. Nevertheless, resistance to BRSV challenge induced by the mutant and WT viruses was similar, suggesting that neither pep27 nor FCS-2 plays a major role in the induction of protective immunity.
Present address: IVI Animal Health, Artillerigatan 12E, SE-75237 Uppsala, Sweden. ![]()
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The RSV genome encodes three glycoproteins: the small hydrophobic protein (SH), the large attachment protein (G) and the fusion protein (F). The G and F proteins mediate binding of virus to cells and F is also responsible for fusion of viral and cell membranes. Several studies indicate that both SH and G are dispensable for virus replication in vitro (Karger et al., 2001
). However, recombinant RSVs (rRSV) lacking these glycoproteins are attenuated in vivo (Collins & Murphy, 2002
; Schmidt et al., 2002
), suggesting that they have accessory functions. The F protein, which is indispensable for virus replication, is synthesized as an inactive precursor, F0, which has to be proteolytically cleaved to become fusion-active. Cleavage, mediated by the endoprotease furin, occurs at two sites, FCS-1 (RKRR136) and FCS-2 [RA(R/K)R109], and results in the formation of F1 and F2 subunits linked by a disulphide bridge and in the release of an N-glycosylated peptide of 27 amino acids (pep27) (Gonzalez-Reyes et al., 2001
; Zimmer et al., 2001
). Cleavage at both sites is required for efficient syncytium formation and to allow changes in F protein structure from cone- to lollipop-shaped spikes (Begona Ruiz-Arguello et al., 2002
; Gonzalez-Reyes et al., 2001
; Zimmer et al., 2001
). In BRSV-infected cells in vitro, pep27 is further subjected to post-translational modifications and is converted into virokinin, a member of the tachykinin family (Zimmer et al., 2003
). Other known members of the tachykinin family are substance P, neurokinins A and B, haemokinin and endokinins A and B, all of which have proinflammatory and immunomodulatory properties (Patacchini et al., 2004
; Pennefather et al., 2004
). Tachykinins are produced by neurons and also by immune and inflammatory cells (Maggi, 1997
). Recent results obtained in vitro suggest that the BRSV virokinin may cause bronchoconstriction, since it induces smooth muscle contraction (Zimmer et al., 2003
).
Previous studies demonstrated that neither the FCS-2 RA(R/K)R109 nor pep27 were essential for replication of BRSV in cell culture (Zimmer et al., 2002
). However, mutant BRSV in which cleavage at the RA(R/K)R109 motif was abolished did not grow as efficiently as the parental virus during early replication cycles and showed reduced syncytium formation. BRSV lacking pep27 also showed reduced syncytium formation, although replication was similar to that of the parental virus. In the present study, we have investigated the virulence, pathogenesis and immunogenicity of rBRSV lacking pep27 (rBRSV
p27) and of rBRSV with two mutations, K108N and R109N, in FCS-2 RA(R/K)R109 (rBRSV108/109) in young calves.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
106130), which comprises FCS-2 and most of pep27 (rBRSV
p27), were derived from full-length cDNA of BRSV strain A51908
[GenBank]
(Mohanty et al., 1975
|
Calves and experimental design.
Gnotobiotic, BRSV-seronegative calves were delivered and reared individually in plastic isolators as described previously (Dennis et al., 1976
). In order to evaluate the virulence of WT and F-mutant rBRSV, groups of three or four gnotobiotic calves were infected at 23 weeks of age with approximately 2x106 p.f.u. virus in a volume of 20 ml, 10 ml administered intranasally (i.n.) and 10 ml intratracheally (i.t.). Clinical examinations were performed twice a day following virus infection. Calves were killed 6 days after infection by intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital (Euthatal; Merial Animal Health Ltd). At post-mortem examination, macroscopic lung lesions were recorded on a standard lung diagram and the extent of pneumonic consolidation was expressed as percentage pneumonia. BAL was collected by irrigating the lungs from each calf with 400 ml PBS, as described previously (Taylor et al., 1997
). Cells, prepared from 100 ml of the BAL by centrifugation at 1200 g for 15 min at 4 °C, were resuspended in 5 ml lung buffer for virus isolation (Taylor et al., 1995
). Three pieces of pneumonic lung taken from three different lobes were homogenized in lung buffer to give a 20 % (w/v) suspension. Samples from nasopharyngeal swabs, BAL cells and lung homogenates were inoculated onto Vero or FCK cells to determine virus titres.
In order to evaluate the immunogenicity of the mutant rBRSV, four groups of three or four gnotobiotic calves were inoculated i.n. and i.t. with WT rBRSV, rBRSV108/109 or rBRSV
p27 or with a suspension of non-infected Vero cell lysate as described above. Fourteen days p.i., calves were removed from the plastic isolators, mixed and reared in a high-security, barrier-maintained building. Six weeks p.i., calves were challenged i.n. and i.t. with approximately 103 p.f.u. virulent BRSV Snook. Serum samples and heparinized blood were obtained at 3-week intervals for analysis of serum antibodies and T-cell priming. Following challenge, nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained daily and calves were killed 6 days after challenge to determine the extent of gross pneumonic consolidation and the extent of virus infection in the lower respiratory tract.
All experiments were performed in compliance with the regulations of the UK Home Office Scientific Procedures Act (1986).
Virokinin ELISA.
BAL supernatant from BRSV-infected calves was analysed for the presence of virokinin using a competitive ELISA as described previously (Zimmer et al., 2003
). Briefly, equal volumes of BAL supernatant and biotinylated virokinin were incubated with rabbit anti-virokinin serum bound to protein A-coated microtitre plates. The wells were washed and incubated with streptavidinperoxidase complex. After washing, wells were incubated with 2,2'-azino-di-[3-ethylbenthiazoline sulfonate] diammonium salt peroxidase substrate (Roche Applied Science). The amount of biotinylated virokinin was determined by reference to a standard curve in the range 0.01100 ng ml1.
Immunocytochemistry.
Pieces of lung taken at post-mortem were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and cryostat sections were stained with mouse mAb19, specific for the RSV F protein (Taylor et al., 1992
), or with rabbit anti-virokinin serum (Zimmer et al., 2003
). The primary antibodies were detected with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Sigma) or FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma).
Histology.
Lung tissue for histology was fixed in 10 % neutral-buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin wax and sections were stained with carbol chromotrope. Eosinophils were counted in 100 high-power microscope fields on three lung sections from three or four calves infected with each rBRSV and from mock-infected control animals.
Serology.
The presence of antibodies to BRSV in sera was determined by ELISA using a lysate prepared from FCK cells infected with the Snook strain of BRSV and a lysate of mock-infected cells as control antigen, as described previously (Taylor et al., 1995
). Neutralizing antibodies to BRSV were determined by a plaque-reduction assay on FCK cells using heat-inactivated serum as described previously (Kennedy et al., 1988
).
T-cell assays.
BRSV-specific lymphocyte proliferative responses were analysed 6 weeks after immunization, as described previously (Taylor et al., 1995
). The proportions of BRSV-specific CD8+ IFN-
+ T cells in peripheral blood were determined 6 weeks after immunization by flow cytometry as described previously (Gaddum et al., 2003
) and the proportion of BRSV-specific CD4+ IFN-
+ T cells was determined in a similar way using mAb CC8 to detect CD4+ T cells (Howard et al., 1991
).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
p27 in cell culture was similar, replication of rBRSV108/109 was slightly retarded, and both mutant viruses showed reduced syncytium formation in Vero cells compared with that induced by the parental WT rBRSV (Zimmer et al., 2002
The duration of virus excretion and the mean peak virus titres in the nasopharynx of calves infected with rBRSV108/109 or WT rBRSV were similar and greater than those observed in calves infected with
p27 virus (Table 1
). However, the differences between the three groups of calves were not statistically significant. In the lower respiratory tract, the mean virus titre in BAL cells from calves infected with
p27 virus was similar to that obtained in animals infected with WT rBRSV (Table 1
). Titres of rBRSV108/109 in BAL were approximately 20-fold greater than those in calves infected with either rBRSV WT or
p27. Both of the F-mutant viruses were recovered more frequently from lung homogenates than was WT rBRSV at 6 days p.i. (Table 1
). However, there were no significant differences in the mean titres of virus recovered from homogenates of three lung samples collected from each animal from the three groups of calves (Table 1
).
|
|
Studies in vitro have demonstrated that pep27 of rBRSV108/109 remains attached to the F2 subunit and is transported to the cell surface, where it undergoes C-terminal maturation to produce a shorter peptide that terminates with the classical tachykinin motif (Zimmer et al., 2003
). Expression of this tachykinin epitope on the surface of cells infected with rBRSV108/109 can be detected using anti-substance P or anti-virokinin antibodies (Zimmer et al., 2003
). In order to determine whether expression of the tachykinin epitope could be detected in the lungs of calves experimentally infected with rBRSV108/109, sections of snap-frozen lung were stained with a mAb to the F protein and antiserum to substance P or antiserum to the virokinin. Whereas cells expressing the F protein were detected in lung sections from calves infected with rBRSV108/109, there was no reaction with either the substance P or virokinin antibody (results not shown).
Mucosal immunization of calves with rBRSV containing mutations in FCS-2 or lacking the virokinin protects against challenge with virulent BRSV
The BRSV-specific serum antibody response in groups of three or four gnotobiotic calves that had been inoculated i.n. and i.t. with WT, 108/109 or
p27 rBRSVs or with non-infected Vero cell lysates was analysed by ELISA. There were no significant differences in the levels of antibodies as detected by ELISA in any of the infected calves (Table 2
and Fig. 3a
). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the Ig isotypes of the BRSV-specific antibodies between calves immunized with WT or F-mutant rBRSVs (data not shown). However, serum neutralizing antibody titres in calves infected with rBRSV108/109 were significantly lower 6 weeks after vaccination than those in calves infected with either
p27 or WT rBRSVs (Table 2
and Fig. 3b
) (P<0.05). Six days after challenge with the virulent Snook strain of BRSV, neutralizing antibody titres increased in calves that had been immunized with rBRSV WT or 108/109, but not in calves immunized with
p27 (Fig. 3b
).
|
|
+ or CD8+ IFN-
+ T cells between calves immunized with either of the rBRSV F mutants or WT virus and no significant differences in the BRSV-specific lymphocyte proliferative response (results not shown).
Following challenge, clinical signs of respiratory disease were not observed in any calves. Nevertheless, gross pneumonic lesions were present in all of the control calves and the extent was similar to that reported previously (Valarcher et al., 2003
). In contrast, there was little or no pneumonic consolidation in calves that had been immunized with either of the F-mutant or WT viruses. Furthermore, calves previously immunized with either of the F-mutant viruses were highly resistant to subsequent infection with BRSV Snook (Table 2
). Following challenge, virus was isolated from the upper and lower respiratory tract of all control calves, previously inoculated with non-infected cell lysate. In contrast, little or no virus was isolated from the upper or lower respiratory tract of calves previously immunized with either of the F-mutant or WT viruses (Table 2
).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
p27 in the bovine upper respiratory tract was reduced, but not significantly, compared with that of WT rBRSV. Nevertheless, the replication of these viruses in the bovine lower respiratory tract and in vitro was similar. Both mutant viruses showed reduced syncytium formation in cell culture compared with that of WT rBRSV and both induced a reduced pulmonary inflammatory response and less damage to bronchial epithelial cells than WT rBRSV in vivo. This reduction in pulmonary pathology did not appear to correlate with the level of virus replication in the lungs, which was similar for WT and mutant viruses. The differences in the inflammatory response may therefore be related to differences in the ability of the viruses either to cause a direct cytopathic effect or to induce an inflammatory response. However, neither HRSV infection of well-differentiated human airway epithelial cell (AEC) cultures in vitro (Zhang et al., 2002
The role of the virokinin in the pulmonary inflammatory response and in eosinophil recruitment, in particular, is unclear. Both substance P and neurokinin A can contribute to eosinophil recruitment in the lungs of guinea pigs (Tiberio et al., 2003
), although a number of studies suggest that tachykinins do not act on their own to mediate neutrophil or eosinophil accumulation but play a role in granulocyte accumulation during an ongoing inflammatory process (Cao et al., 2000
; Numao & Agrawal, 1992
). These observations correlate with preliminary studies in which we failed to demonstrate any chemotactic effects of a synthetic BRSV virokinin (Zimmer et al., 2003
) on freshly isolated bovine granulocytes in vitro (unpublished observations) or following i.n. inoculation of BALB/c mice with the synthetic virokinin (unpublished observations). If the virokinin plays a role in eosinophil recruitment, its absence in rBRSV
p27 could explain the small numbers of eosinophils in the lungs of calves infected with this virus. However, since cleavage at the mutated FCS-2 by exogenous trypsin has been demonstrated in vitro (Zimmer et al., 2003
), it is possible that the virokinin may have been produced by bronchial epithelial cells infected with rBRSV108/109 as a result of trypsin-like proteases produced by Clara cells in vivo. The failure to detect the uncleaved peptide on the surface of bronchial epithelial cells in the lungs of calves infected with rBRSV108/109 by immunostaining may indicate that cleavage had occurred in vivo. However, it was not possible to confirm this by detection of virokinin in BAL fluid. Thus, attempts to detect virokinin by ELISA in BAL fluid from calves infected with WT rBRSV or even the virulent Snook strain of BRSV were unsuccessful. This may be due to the sensitivity of the assay or because of the very short half life of the virokinin, which could be degraded by enzymes such as tryptase released by mast cells (Tam & Caughey, 1990
; Zimmer et al., 2001
) or neutral endopeptidase located at the surface of AEC (Di Maria et al., 1998
). It is possible that there may be differences in vivo in the availability of active virokinin produced by rBRSV108/109 and WT rBRSV that are related to the site at which processing of the F protein takes place. Thus, cleavage at FCS-2 of the rBRSV108/109 F protein by extracellular trypsin-like proteases would take place at the apical surface of the bronchial epithelial cells, and the virokinin would be released into the bronchial lumen. In contrast, cleavage of the native F protein occurs within the trans-Golgi network, so that the virokinin would be formed intracellularly and its secretion might not be restricted to the apical surface of polarized cells.
The influx of inflammatory cells into RSV-infected respiratory tissues is associated with increased levels of a number of different chemokines, such as RANTES, MCP-1, IL-8 and MIP-1
(Domachowske et al., 2001
; Harrison et al., 1999
; McNamara et al., 2005
; Noah & Becker, 2000
; Olszewska-Pazdrak et al., 1998
). Chemokines play an important role in the recruitment and activation of leukocytes, and MIP-1
and RANTES are potent chemoattractants for human eosinophils. A correlation between levels of MIP-1
and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in the lower airways of infants hospitalized with severe RSV disease has been demonstrated (Harrison et al., 1999
), and the presence of eosinophil degranulation products in the respiratory tract of such infants has led to the suggestion that eosinophil degranulation plays a role in the pathogenesis of RSV disease (Garofalo et al., 1992
; Harrison et al., 1999
). However, since pulmonary eosinophilia is not typically seen in infants hospitalized with HRSV infection, with the exception of a small proportion in the lungs of RSV-infected recipients of a formalin-inactivated HRSV vaccine (Prince et al., 2001
), it may be that the eosinophil response occurs early after RSV infection and is resolving by the time infants are hospitalized (Rosenberg & Domachowske, 2001
). In our studies, differences in the eosinophil response between calves infected with the F mutants or WT rBRSV were not associated with significant differences in levels of expression of RANTES or MIP-1
mRNA in lung tissue, as determined by quantitative RT-PCR (unpublished observations). These observations support the suggestion that the BRSV virokinin is involved in the recruitment of eosinophils into the lung. However, this tachykinin is produced by BRSV and not by HRSV. Thus, the 27-mer peptide produced during the maturation of the HRSV F protein does not contain a tachykinin motif (Zimmer et al., 2003
), suggesting that the virokinin may be an additional factor to chemokines involved in eosinophil recruitment in BRSV infection.
Since the primary sequence of the virokinin is highly conserved in all BRSV strains, it has been suggested that it may be of benefit to the virus. The advantage to BRSV of recruiting eosinophils to the site of infection remains unclear, but this effect may be only one property of the virokinin. The biological role of activated eosinophils in RSV infection remains speculative, but it has been demonstrated that eosinophil products have an antiviral effect against HRSV (Rosenberg & Domachowske, 2001
; Soukup & Becker, 2003
). As a consequence and because virokinin is specific to BRSV, the production of the virokinin may explain the shorter duration of BRSV shedding in cattle compared with that of HRSV in man (Hall et al., 1976
; Valarcher et al., 1999
). This suggestion is supported by the more frequent isolation of the F mutants from lung tissues compared with that of the WT virus. On the other hand, recruitment of eosinophils to the site of virus infection may contribute to damage to the respiratory mucosa and ciliostasis (Hirata et al., 1996
; Hisamatsu et al., 1990
; Liu & Okuda, 1988
), which could facilitate viral infection of epithelial cells. As mentioned previously, damage to the bronchial epithelium and loss of cilia were more apparent in lungs from calves infected with WT rBRSV than in those infected with either of the F mutants, and this correlated with the presence of eosinophils.
Mutations in FCS-2 or deletion of pep27 did not affect the induction of a protective immune response. Although tachykinins are potent immunomodulators (Goetzl & Sreedharan, 1992
; Maggi, 1997
; McGillis et al., 1990
), deletion of the 27-mer peptide did not appear to influence either the humoral or T-cell-mediated immune response to BRSV. However, mucosal immunization with rBRSV108/109, which is not cleaved at FCS-2, induced lower neutralizing antibody titres than immunization with either rBRSV
p27 or WT rBRSV. The low neutralizing, but high ELISA, antibody titres induced by immunization with rBRSV108/109 could be due to loss of neutralizing epitopes in the F protein of this virus. However, rBRSV108/109 was recognized by F-specific neutralizing mAbs (unpublished observations). Despite the low levels of neutralizing antibodies, calves immunized with rBRSV108/109 were strongly protected against subsequent BRSV infection in the upper airways and completely protected in the lower airways.
Since the virokinin is capable of inducing smooth muscle contraction in vitro, it has been suggested that it may contribute to the pathogenicity of BRSV. Several symptoms associated with severe BRSV infection, such as bronchoconstriction, excessive mucus production and oedema, are inducible by substance P and other tachykinins. However, the parental WT rBRSV was attenuated in calves, so it has not been possible to determine the contribution of the virokinin to the development of clinical signs of respiratory disease. Nevertheless, the findings from this study suggest a role for the BRSV F protein virokinin in the pulmonary inflammatory response and indicate that mutations in FCS-2 or deletion of pep27 do not significantly affect the induction of protective immunity.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Begona Ruiz-Arguello, M., Gonzalez-Reyes, L., Calder, L. J., Palomo, C., Martin, D., Saiz, M. J., Garcia-Barreno, B., Skehel, J. J. & Melero, J. A. (2002). Effect of proteolytic processing at two distinct sites on shape and aggregation of an anchorless fusion protein of human respiratory syncytial virus and fate of the intervening segment. Virology 298, 317326.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cao, T., Pinter, E., Al-Rashed, S., Gerard, N., Hoult, J. R. & Brain, S. D. (2000). Neurokinin-1 receptor agonists are involved in mediating neutrophil accumulation in the inflamed, but not normal, cutaneous microvasculature: an in vivo study using neurokinin-1 receptor knockout mice. J Immunol 164, 54245429.
Collins, P. L. & Murphy, B. R. (2002). Respiratory syncytial virus: reverse genetics and vaccine strategies. Virology 296, 204211.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dennis, M. J., Davis, D. C. & Hoare, M. N. (1976). A simplified apparatus for the microbiological isolation of calves. Br Vet J 132, 642646.[Medline]
Di Maria, G. U., Bellofiore, S. & Geppetti, P. (1998). Regulation of airway neurogenic inflammation by neutral endopeptidase. Eur Respir J 12, 14541462.[Abstract]
Domachowske, J. B., Bonville, C. A. & Rosenberg, E. S. (2001). Gene expression in epithelial cells in response to pneumovirus infection. Respir Res 2, 225233.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gaddum, R. M., Cook, R. S., Furze, J. M., Ellis, S. A. & Taylor, G. (2003). Recognition of bovine respiratory syncytial virus proteins by bovine CD8+ T lymphocytes. Immunology 108, 220229.[CrossRef][Medline]
Garofalo, R., Kimpen, J. L. L., Welliver, R. C. & Ogra, P. L. (1992). Eosinophil degranulation in the respiratory tract during naturally acquired respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Pediatr 120, 2832.[CrossRef][Medline]
Goetzl, E. J. & Sreedharan, S. P. (1992). Mediators of communication and adaptation in the neuroendocrine and immune systems. FASEB J 6, 26462652.[Abstract]
Gonzalez-Reyes, L., Ruiz-Arguello, M. B., Garcia-Barreno, B., Calder, L., Lopez, J. A., Albar, J. P., Skehel, J. J., Wiley, D. C. & Melero, J. A. (2001). Cleavage of the human respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein at two distinct sites is required for activation of membrane fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 98599864.
Hall, C. B., Douglas, R. G., Jr & Geiman, J. M. (1976). Respiratory syncytial virus infections in infants: quantitation and duration of shedding. J Pediatr 89, 1115.[CrossRef][Medline]
Harrison, A. M., Bonville, C. A., Rosenberg, H. F. & Domachowske, J. B. (1999). Respiratory syncytial virus-induced chemokine expression in the lower airways: eosinophil recruitment and degranulation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159, 19181924.
Hirata, A., Motojima, S., Fukuda, T. & Makino, S. (1996). Damage to respiratory epithelium by guinea-pig eosinophils stimulated with IgG-coated Sepharose beads. Clin Exp Allergy 26, 848858.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hisamatsu, K., Ganbo, T., Nakazawa, T., Murakami, Y., Gleich, G. J., Makiyama, K. & Koyama, H. (1990). Cytotoxicity of human eosinophil granule major basic protein to human nasal sinus mucosa in vitro. J Allergy Clin Immunol 86, 5263.[CrossRef][Medline]
Howard, C. J., Morrison, W. I., Mackay, C. R. & Splitter, G. A. (1991). Leukocyte antigens in cattle, sheep and goats. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Leukocyte Antigens in Cattle, Sheep and Goats. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 27, 194.[CrossRef][Medline]
Karger, A., Schmidt, U. & Buchholz, U. J. (2001). Recombinant bovine respiratory syncytial virus with deletions of the G or SH genes: G and F proteins bind heparin. J Gen Virol 82, 631640.
Kennedy, H. E., Jones, B. V., Tucker, E. M., Ford, N. J., Clarke, S. W., Furze, J. M., Thomas, L. H. & Stott, E. J. (1988). Production and characterisation of bovine monoclonal antibodies to respiratory syncytial virus. J Gen Virol 69, 30233032.
Liu, C. M. & Okuda, M. (1988). Injurious effect of eosinophil extract on the human nasal mucosa. Rhinology 26, 121132.[Medline]
Maggi, C. A. (1997). The effects of tachykinins on inflammatory and immune cells. Regul Pept 70, 7590.[CrossRef][Medline]
McGillis, J. P., Mitsuhashi, M. & Payan, D. G. (1990). Immunomodulation by tachykinin neuropeptides. Ann N Y Acad Sci 594, 8594.[Medline]
McNamara, P. S., Flanagan, B. F., Hart, C. A. & Smyth, R. L. (2005). Production of chemokines in the lungs of infants with severe respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. J Infect Dis 191, 12251232.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mohanty, S. B., Ingling, A. L. & Lillie, M. G. (1975). Experimentally induced respiratory syncytial viral infection in calves. Am J Vet Res 36, 417419.[Medline]
Noah, T. & Becker, S. (2000). Chemokines in nasal secretions of normal adults experimentally infected with respiratory syncytial virus. Clin Immunol 97, 4349.[CrossRef][Medline]
Numao, T. & Agrawal, D. K. (1992). Neuropeptides modulate human eosinophil chemotaxis. J Immunol 149, 33093315.[Abstract]
Olszewska-Pazdrak, B., Casola, A., Saito, T., Alam, R., Crowe, S. E., Mei, F., Ogra, P. L. & Garofola, R. P. (1998). Cell-specific expression of RANTES, MCP-1 and MIP-1a by lower airway epithelial cells and eosinophils infected with respiratory syncytial virus. J Virol 72, 47564764.
Patacchini, R., Lecci, A., Holzer, P. & Maggi, C. A. (2004). Newly discovered tachykinins raise new questions about their peripheral roles and the tachykinin nomenclature. Trends Pharmacol Sci 25, 13.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pennefather, J. N., Lecci, A., Candenas, M. L., Patak, E., Pinto, F. M. & Maggi, C. A. (2004). Tachykinins and tachykinin receptors: a growing family. Life Sci 74, 14451463.[CrossRef][Medline]
Prince, G. A., Curtis, S. J., Yim, K. C. & Porter, D. D. (2001). Vaccine-enhanced respiratory syncytial virus disease in cotton rats following immunization with Lot 100 or a newly prepared reference vaccine. J Gen Virol 82, 28812888.
Rosenberg, H. F. & Domachowske, J. B. (2001). Eosinophils, eosinophil ribonucleases, and their role in host defense against respiratory virus pathogens. J Leukoc Biol 70, 691698.
Schmidt, U., Breyer, J., Polster, U., Gershwin, L. J. & Buchholz, U. (2002). Mucosal immunization with live recombinant bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) and recombinant BRSV lacking the envelope glycoprotein G protects against challenge with wild-type BRSV. J Virol 76, 1235512359.
Schreiber, P., Matheise, J. P., Dessy, F., Heimann, M., Letesson, J. J., Coppe, P. & Collard, A. (2000). High mortality rate associated with bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) infection in Belgian white blue calves previously vaccinated with an inactivated BRSV vaccine. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 47, 535550.[Medline]
Soukup, J. M. & Becker, S. (2003). Role of monocytes and eosinophils in human respiratory syncytial virus infection in vitro. Clin Immunol 107, 178185.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stott, E. J. & Taylor, G. (1985). Respiratory syncytial virus. Brief review. Arch Virol 84, 152.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stott, E. J., Thomas, L. H., Taylor, G., Collins, A. P., Jebbett, J. & Crouch, S. (1984). A comparison of three vaccines against respiratory syncytial virus in calves. J Hyg 93, 251261.
Tam, E. K. & Caughey, G. H. (1990). Degradation of airway neuropeptides by human lung tryptase. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 3, 2732.
Taylor, G., Stott, E. J., Furze, J., Ford, J. & Sopp, P. (1992). Protective epitopes on the fusion protein of respiratory syncytial virus recognized by murine and bovine monoclonal antibodies. J Gen Virol 73, 22172223.
Taylor, G., Thomas, L. H., Wyld, S. G., Furze, J., Sopp, P. & Howard, C. J. (1995). Role of T-lymphocyte subsets in recovery from respiratory syncytial virus infection in calves. J Virol 69, 66586664.[Abstract]
Taylor, G., Thomas, L. H., Furze, J. M., Cook, R. S., Wyld, S. G., Lerch, R., Hardy, R. & Wertz, G. W. (1997). Recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing the F, G or N, but not the M2, protein of bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) induce resistance to BRSV challenge in the calf and protect against the development of pneumonic lesions. J Gen Virol 78, 31953206.[Abstract]
Thomas, L. H., Gourlay, R. N., Stott, E. J., Howard, C. J. & Bridger, J. C. (1982). A search for new microorganisms in calf pneumonia by the inoculation of gnotobiotic calves. Res Vet Sci 33, 170182.[Medline]
Thomas, L. H., Stott, E. J., Collins, A. P. & Jebbett, J. (1984). Experimental pneumonia in gnotobiotic calves produced by respiratory syncytial virus. Br J Exp Pathol 65, 1928.[Medline]
Tiberio, I. F., Leick-Maldonado, E. A., Miyahara, L., Kasahara, D. I., Spilborghs, G. M., Martins, M. A. & Saldiva, P. H. (2003). Effects of neurokinins on airway and alveolar eosinophil recruitment. Exp Lung Res 29, 165177.[CrossRef][Medline]
Valarcher, J. F., Bourhy, H., Gelfi, J. & Schelcher, F. (1999). Evaluation of a nested reverse transcription-PCR assay based on the nucleoprotein gene for diagnosis of spontaneous and experimental bovine respiratory syncytial virus infections. J Clin Microbiol 37, 18581862.
Valarcher, J.-F., Furze, J., Wyld, S., Cook, R., Conzelmann, K.-K. & Taylor, G. (2003). Role of type I interferons in the attenuation and immunogenicity of recombinant bovine respiratory syncytial viruses (BRSV) lacking NS proteins. J Virol 77, 84268439.
Wright, P. F., Karron, R. A., Belshe, R. B. & 15 other authors (2000). Evaluation of a live, cold-passaged, temperature-sensitive, respiratory syncytial virus vaccine candidate in infancy. J Infect Dis 182, 13311342.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang, L., Peeples, M. E., Boucher, R. C., Collins, P. L. & Pickles, R. J. (2002). Respiratory syncytial virus infection of human airway epithelial cells is polarized, specific to ciliated cells, and without obvious cytopathology. J Virol 76, 56545666.
Zimmer, G., Budz, L. & Herrler, G. (2001). Proteolytic activation of respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein. J Biol Chem 276, 3164231650.
Zimmer, G., Conzelmann, K.-K. & Herrler, G. (2002). Cleavage at the furin consensus sequence RAK/KR109 and presence of the intervening peptide of the respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein are dispensable for virus replication in cell culture. J Virol 76, 92189224.
Zimmer, G., Rohn, M., McGregor, G. P., Schemann, M., Conzelmann, K. K. & Herrler, G. (2003). Virokinin, a bioactive peptide of the tachykinin family, is released from the fusion protein of bovine respiratory syncytial virus. J Biol Chem 278, 4685446861.
Received 9 December 2005;
accepted 30 January 2006.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Yamada and D. X. Liu Proteolytic Activation of the Spike Protein at a Novel RRRR/S Motif Is Implicated in Furin-Dependent Entry, Syncytium Formation, and Infectivity of Coronavirus Infectious Bronchitis Virus in Cultured Cells J. Virol., September 1, 2009; 83(17): 8744 - 8758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Belouzard, V. C. Chu, and G. R. Whittaker Activation of the SARS coronavirus spike protein via sequential proteolytic cleavage at two distinct sites PNAS, April 7, 2009; 106(14): 5871 - 5876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Goris, S. Uhlenbruck, C. Schwegmann-Wessels, W. Kohl, F. Niedorf, M. Stern, M. Hewicker-Trautwein, R. Bals, G. Taylor, A. Braun, et al. Differential Sensitivity of Differentiated Epithelial Cells to Respiratory Viruses Reveals Different Viral Strategies of Host Infection J. Virol., February 15, 2009; 83(4): 1962 - 1968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |