J Gen Virol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 87 (2006), 2085-2088; DOI 10.1099/vir.0.81871-0

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Llamas, S.
Right arrow Articles by García-Arenal, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Llamas, S.
Right arrow Articles by García-Arenal, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Llamas, S.
Right arrow Articles by García-Arenal, F.
© 2006 Society for General Microbiology

Short Communication

Analysis of the viability of coat-protein hybrids between Cucumber mosaic virus and Tomato aspermy virus

Susana Llamas, Ignacio M. Moreno and Fernando García-Arenal

Departamento de Biotecnología, ETSI Agrónomos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Correspondence
Fernando García-Arenal
fernando.garciaarenal{at}upm.es


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
MAIN TEXT
REFERENCES
 
Coat-protein (CP) hybrids between Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) and Tomato aspermy virus (TAV) were engineered to analyse reported CP-associated differences between these viruses. CP portions delimited by aa 1–59, 60–148 and 149–219 were exchanged in all possible combinations within TAV RNA3. The seven possible chimeras were able to replicate in tobacco protoplasts to similar levels, but only those having residues 1–59 or 60–148 from CMV were infectious to tobacco plants, a common host for CMV and TAV, and formed stable particles. When most of the movement protein (MP) of TAV was substituted for that of CMV, infectivity of CP hybrids did not vary. No hybrid was able to infect cucumber plants, a host for CMV and not for TAV. Need for MP–CP compatibility could explain these results, but shows that MP–CP compatibility conditions the use of CP chimeras to map CP-associated differences between CMV and TAV.


   MAIN TEXT
TOP
ABSTRACT
MAIN TEXT
REFERENCES
 
The genus Cucumovirus (family Bromoviridae) comprises aphid-transmitted plant viruses with a single-stranded, messenger-sense, tripartite RNA genome encoding five proteins. RNAs 1 and 2 encode proteins 1a and 2a, respectively, which are part of the replicase complex. RNA2 also encodes protein 2b, a post-transcriptional gene-silencing suppressor. RNA3 has two ORFs separated by an intergenic region (IR) and encodes protein 3a and the capsid protein (CP), both of which are necessary for cell-to-cell movement of virus in the host plant (Palukaitis & García-Arenal, 2003Down). The 3a protein is the movement protein (MP) with RNA-binding and plasmodesmata-gating abilities, and is able to traffic itself and RNA through plasmodesmata (Vaquero et al., 1994Down; Ding et al., 1995Down; Li & Palukaitis, 1996Down). The role of the CP in cell-to-cell movement is unclear. RNA accumulation in protoplasts was diminished considerably for CP deletion mutants and it was proposed that the CP is necessary to protect the (+)-sense viral RNA from degradation in the host cytoplasm (Boccard & Baulcombe, 1993Down; Suzuki et al., 1991Down). It could be that CP protection of the viral RNA would be necessary for efficient cell-to-cell movement. Additionally, cell-to-cell movement requires specific compatibility of the MP and CP of different cucumoviruses (Salánki et al., 1997Down, 2004Down), suggesting that both proteins interact for this function. Both the MP and the CP are required also for long-distance movement through the phloem and the CP has host-specific determinants for access to the phloem (Palukaitis & García-Arenal, 2003Down).

Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) and Tomato aspermy virus (TAV) are two cucumoviruses that differ in several properties. The three-dimensional structure of their particles has been resolved, showing high similarity (Smith et al., 2000Down; Lucas et al., 2002Down), which agrees with the ability for in vitro assembly of stable particles built of CMV and TAV CP subunits (Chen et al., 1995Down). Some important differences in the biology of CMV and TAV have been mapped to the CP by using reassortant and chimeric viruses (Palukaitis & García-Arenal, 2003Down). One such difference is the ability of CMV, but not of TAV, to infect cucumber plants. Both viruses replicate in cucumber protoplasts and move from cell to cell in the inoculated leaf, but only CMV infects cucumber systemically. The CP of CMV is required for access to the sieve elements in cucumber and can complement the systemic movement of TAV (Taliansky & García-Arenal, 1995Down; Thompson & García-Arenal, 1998Down).

Hybrid viruses exchanging CP regions between CMV and TAV were engineered with three aims: to explore the viability of hybrid CPs and their capacity to form stable particles, to explore the compatibility of the heterologous MP and CP for cell-to-cell movement and to identify determinants in the CP of CMV for systemic infection of cucumber plants. Seven CP chimeras were engineered within a full-length cDNA clone of 1-TAV RNA3 [clone p13 of Moreno et al. (1997)Down]. To minimize alteration of the CP structure, points for sequence exchange were in loops of the CP beta-barrel structure. Four restriction sites were chosen for sequence exchange, located at the indicated nucleotide positions (numbered as in GenBank accession no. AJ277269 [GenBank] ): XbaI (nt 1222, in the IR 4 nt upstream of the CP ORF), NheI, EagI (nt 1404 and 1679, in the CP ORF) and SphI [nt 1906, in the 3' untranslated region (UTR), 13 nt downstream of the CP ORF]. Six primers were designed to PCR-amplify specific regions of Fny-CMV RNA3: XD had an XbaI restriction site 5' to a sequence identical to nt 1257–1276, ND had an NheI site 5' to a sequence identical to nt 1440–1457, NR had an NheI site 5' to a sequence complementary to nt 1414–1439, ED had an EagI site 5' to a sequence identical to nt 1701–1721, ER had an EagI site 5' to a sequence complementary to nt 1683–1700 and SR had an SphI site 5' to a sequence complementary to nt 1902–1920 (position numbers as in GenBank accession no. D10538 [GenBank] ). By using combinations of these primers on a clone of Fny-CMV RNA3, fragments limited by nt 1257–1433 (fragment A), 1434–1699 (fragment B), 1700–1921 (fragment C), 1257–1699 (fragment AB), 1434–1921 (fragment BC) and 1257–1921 (fragment ABC) were amplified, cloned into pGEM-T (Promega), sequenced and subcloned into p13 previously digested with the corresponding restriction enzymes. Thus, the following seven chimeras were obtained: A, B, C, AB, AC, BC and ABC (Fig. 1Down). All hybrid RNA3 had the 5' and 3' UTRs, plus the 3a ORF and IR of 1-TAV, but chimeras C, AC, BC and ABC had the first 7 nt of the 3' UTR from CMV, resulting in the alteration of GACA to CGTG at positions 1887–1890 of 1-TAV RNA3. The chimeric nature of the clones was confirmed by partial nucleotide-sequence determination.


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Parental and chimeric RNA3 used in this study. Grey and white blocks represent genes from CMV and TAV, respectively. Restriction sites used as points for sequence exchange are indicated.

 
The biological activity of these hybrid RNA3 was assayed in the context of RNAs 1+2 from Fny-CMV (F1 and F2, respectively). Because tobacco is a common host for CMV and TAV, the ability to replicate was assayed in tobacco mesophyll protoplasts. RNAs 1 and 2 of Fny-CMV and RNA3 of Fny-CMV (F3), 1-TAV (T3) or of the chimeras in Fig. 1Up were transcribed from cDNA clones (Rizzo & Palukaitis, 1990Down; Moreno et al., 1997Down) by using an AmpliCap kit (Epicentre), 5 µg of each transcript was used to transfect 5x105 protoplasts per treatment (Moreno et al., 1997Down) and nucleic acids were extracted 24 h post-inoculation. After 1 % agarose-gel electrophoresis, Northern blots were hybridized with a mixture of 32P-labelled RNA probes complementary to the 3' UTRs of CMV and TAV (positions 1920–2391 or 1933–2215 of the respective RNA3). All hybrid RNA3 were able to replicate in tobacco protoplasts with F1+F2 to similar levels (Fig. 2aDown). Hence, neither the hybrid nature of the CP ORF nor the four point mutations introduced in the 3' UTR of chimeras C, AC and ABC affected the capacity of the hybrids to replicate, compared with T3.


Figure 2
View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Northern blot hybridization analysis of RNA accumulation for the indicated RNA3 when co-inoculated with RNAs 1 and 2 of Fny-CMV. (a) RNA (2.5 µg) extracted from tobacco protoplasts 24 h post-inoculation was loaded onto each lane. (b) RNA (1.5 µg) extracted from directly inoculated tobacco leaves 7 d.p.i. was loaded onto each lane. Mock, mock-inoculated controls. CMV and TAV indicate 50 ng virion-purified RNA. Blots were hybridized with a mixture of probes complementary to CMV and TAV 3' UTRs. (b) Hybrids C and C* are shown as examples of those not infectious to tobacco plants.

 
The infectivity of the hybrid viruses was assayed on tobacco plants. Young tobacco plants were inoculated with 5 µg of each RNA transcript. Infection was detected by the development of symptoms and by dot-blot hybridization of nucleic acid extracts from inoculated and upper leaves with the above-described RNA probes. Only plants infected with F1F2F3, F1F2T3, F1F2A and F1F2B developed systemic symptoms, which appeared 9 days post-inoculation (d.p.i.) for F1F2F3 and much later (15–17 d.p.i.) for F1F2T3, F1F2A and F1F2B. F1F2A caused a mild mosaic, as did F1F2F3, whilst F1F2T3 and F1F2B caused a more severe oak-leaf pattern mosaic, as did 1-TAV (not shown). Differences in infectivity between these four viruses (Table 1Down) were not significant (P>=0.10 in a {chi}2 test). New tobacco plants were inoculated with sap from transcript-infected plants and all plants became infected. Particles of F1F2F3 and F1F2T3 were purified efficiently by the methods described by Lot et al. (1972)Down for CMV and Habili & Francki (1974)Down for TAV, respectively. Particles of F1F2A and F1F2B could be purified by using the TAV procedure, whilst the CMV method gave very poor yields (not shown). Thus, the hybrid CPs A and B were able to assemble into stable particles. The chimeric nature of the viruses that infected tobacco plants was checked by nucleotide-sequence determination (not shown). Inoculation with the other chimeras did not result in symptom expression and virus accumulation was not detected in inoculated or in upper leaves (Table 1Down), showing that they were unable to infect tobacco leaves.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Infectivity of different RNA3 genotypes to tobacco plants

Data are no. infected plants/no. inoculated plants, as assessed by dot-blot hybridization of RNA extracts.

 
Because all CP hybrids replicated in tobacco protoplasts to similar levels, non-infectivity to tobacco leaves could be attributed to the CP not being functional for encapsidation or cell-to-cell movement. CMV CP mutants deficient for assembly could be competent for cell-to-cell movement (Kaplan et al., 1998Down), but were defective for systemic movement (Schmitz & Rao, 1998Down), which is thought to occur as particles (Blackman et al., 1998Down). Accordingly, hybrids A and B infected tobacco systemically and assembled into particles. We do not know the assembly ability of the other hybrid CPs, but none infected the inoculated leaves or became systemic, and it could be predicted that the CP of ABC, identical to that of Fny-CMV, should be competent for assembly. This suggests that, for our chimeras, there is no correlation between CP assembly capacity and infectivity. By using other CMV and TAV strains, Salánki et al. (1997)Down have shown that a chimera having the MP of TAV and the CP of CMV was not infectious with CMV RNAs 1 and 2. The non-infectivity of ABC agrees with these results. From analyses of hybrid MP and CP, Salánki et al. (2004)Down suggested that compatibility between the C-terminal 29 aa of the MP and the C-terminal two-thirds of the CP is required for cell-to-cell movement. The electrostatic potential of the CP would determine that interaction. Our results agree with the first hypothesis, as hybrid A, in which the C terminus of the MP and the C-terminal two-thirds of the CP are from TAV, was infectious. However, our results show a more complex scenario: the infectivity of hybrid B suggests that only the C-terminal one-third of the CP should be compatible with the C terminus of the MP, but in that case, hybrid AB also should be infectious. Thus, our results indicate an effect of aa 1–59 (fragment A) on aa 60–148 (fragment B), affecting CP structure and/or electrostatic potential and, thus, CP–MP compatibility.

A second set of seven chimeras was constructed in which the 3a ORF of 1-TAV was partly replaced by that of Fny-CMV. For convenience, the XcmI and BsaAI sites of p13 (positions 188 and 952, respectively) were used. Primers XcD, with an XcmI site and a sequence identical to nt 218–234, and BR, with a BsaAI site and a sequence complementary to nt 956–975, were used to PCR-amplify the fragment delimited by nt 218–975 of Fny-CMV RNA3, which was cloned in the XcmI and BsaAI sites of p13 and in the cDNA clones of chimeras A, B, C, AB, AC, BC and ABC, yielding chimeras T3* and A*, B*, C*, AB*, AC*, BC* and ABC* (Fig. 1Up). Only F1F2T3*, F1F2A* and F1F2B* infected tobacco plants, but infectivity was reduced significantly (P<0.003) compared with F1F2F3, F1F2A and F1F2B, and virus accumulation was limited to the inoculated leaves (Table 1Up). The chimeric nature of RNA3 of the viruses that infected tobacco plants was checked by nucleotide-sequence determination (not shown). The reduced infectivity of T3*, A* and B* compared with that of T3, A and B could be due to the hybrid MP, although similarity of the N-terminal 33 aa of Fny-CMV and 1-TAV MPs is high (91 % similarity, 73 % identity). Also, the chimeras of this second series have the TAV IR 5'-most 20 nt replaced by the CMV IR 5'-most 14 nt. Although no regulatory sequence has been described in this part of the IR (Palukaitis & García-Arenal, 2003Down), an effect of this substitution in RNA3 replication cannot be discarded. Interestingly, and at odds with Salánki et al. (2004)Down, substituting the MP of TAV for that of CMV did not change the infectivity of the CP hybrids. In particular, hybrid A* was infectious, in contrast to the homologous R3SPT of Salánki et al. (2004)Down, stressing the complexity of MP–CP functional interactions.

Northern blots of total RNA extracts from inoculated leaves suggested that accumulation of F1F2F3, F1F2T3, F1F2A or F1F2B was higher than that of F1F2T3*, F1F2A* and F1F2B* (Fig. 2bUp). Hence, maybe there is a relationship between rate of systemic movement and virus accumulation in inoculated leaves, with a threshold for the virus to become systemic. It could also be that the chimeric MP was non-functional for systemic movement, but competent for cell-to-cell movement, a possibility suggested by other MP mutants (Li et al., 2001Down).

The 15 chimeras above, plus F1F2F3 and F1F2T3, were also inoculated into cucumber cotyledons. None of the chimeras were detected in the cotyledons or leaves of inoculated plants. As expected, F1F2T3 was detected in the inoculated cotyledons, but not in upper leaves, and only F1F2F3 became systemic (not shown). Cucumber plants were also inoculated with F1F2A and F1F2B virions purified from tobacco plants, with the same results (not shown), indicating that failure to infect cucumbers was not due to low transcript infectivity. Hence, neither aa 1–50 nor 60–148 of CMV CP are sufficient for cucumber infection.

In summary, our results show that hybrid CPs exchanging the N-terminal and central one-thirds of CMV and TAV CP can assemble into stable particles, and extend previous results on the compatibility of MP–CP for cell-to-cell movement, showing a more complex picture than considered previously. MP–CP compatibility occurs with hybrids competent for particle assembly, suggesting that interaction of MP and virus particles may be required at some point in the virus life cycle. Our results also show that the compatibility of MP and CP conditions the viability of CP hybrids, limiting their use to map CP-associated differences between CMV and TAV.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This work was supported in part by grant BIO99-1121-C02-02, CICYT, Spain.


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
MAIN TEXT
REFERENCES
 
Blackman, L. M., Boevink, P., Santa Cruz, S., Palukaitis, P. & Oparka, K. J. (1998). The movement protein of cucumber mosaic virus traffics into sieve elements in minor veins of Nicotiana clevelandii. Plant Cell 10, 525–537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Boccard, F. & Baulcombe, D. (1993). Mutational analysis of cis-acting sequences and gene function in RNA3 of cucumber mosaic virus. Virology 193, 563–578.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chen, B., Randles, J. W. & Francki, R. I. B. (1995). Mixed-subunit capsids can be assembled in vitro with coat protein subunits from two cucumoviruses. J Gen Virol 76, 971–973.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ding, B., Li, Q., Nguyen, L., Palukaitis, P. & Lucas, W. J. (1995). Cucumber mosaic virus 3a protein potentiates cell-to-cell trafficking of CMV RNA in tobacco plants. Virology 207, 345–353.[CrossRef][Medline]

Habili, N. & Francki, R. I. B. (1974). Comparative studies on tomato aspermy and cucumber mosaic viruses. I. Physical and chemical properties. Virology 57, 392–401.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kaplan, I. B., Zhang, L. & Palukaitis, P. (1998). Characterization of cucumber mosaic virus. V. Cell-to-cell movement requires capsid protein but not virions. Virology 246, 221–231.[CrossRef][Medline]

Li, Q. & Palukaitis, P. (1996). Comparison of the nucleic acid- and NTP-binding properties of the movement protein of cucumber mosaic cucumovirus and tobacco mosaic tobamovirus. Virology 216, 71–79.[CrossRef][Medline]

Li, Q., Ryu, K. H. & Palukaitis, P. (2001). Cucumber mosaic virus–plant interactions: identification of 3a protein sequences affecting infectivity, cell-to-cell movement, and long-distance movement. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 14, 378–385.[Medline]

Lot, H., Marrou, J., Quiot, J. B. & Esvan, C. (1972). Contribution à l'étude du virus de la mosaïque du concombre (CMV). II. Méthode de purification rapide du virus. Ann Phytopathol 4, 25–38 (in French).

Lucas, R. W., Larson, S. B., Canady, M. A. & McPherson, A. (2002). The structure of tomato aspermy virus by X-ray crystallography. J Struct Biol 139, 90–102.[CrossRef][Medline]

Moreno, I. M., Bernal, J. J., de Blas, B. G., Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. & García-Arenal, F. (1997). The expression level of the 3a movement protein determines differences in severity of symptoms between two strains of tomato aspermy cucumovirus. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 10, 171–179.[Medline]

Palukaitis, P. & García-Arenal, F. (2003). Cucumoviruses. Adv Virus Res 62, 241–323.[Medline]

Rizzo, T. M. & Palukaitis, P. (1990). Construction of full-length cDNA clones of cucumber mosaic virus RNAs 1, 2 and 3: generation of infectious transcripts. Mol Gen Genet 222, 249–256.[CrossRef][Medline]

Salánki, K., Carrère, I., Jacquemond, M., Balázs, E. & Tepfer, M. (1997). Biological properties of pseudorecombinant and recombinant strains created with cucumber mosaic virus and tomato aspermy virus. J Virol 71, 3597–3602.[Abstract]

Salánki, K., Gellért, A., Huppert, E., Náray-Szabó, G. & Balázs, E. (2004). Compatibility of the movement protein and the coat protein of cucumoviruses is required for cell-to-cell movement. J Gen Virol 85, 1039–1048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schmitz, I. & Rao, A. L. N. (1998). Deletions in the conserved amino-terminal basic arm of cucumber mosaic virus coat protein disrupt virion assembly but do not abolish infectivity and cell-to-cell movement. Virology 248, 323–331.[CrossRef][Medline]

Smith, T. J., Chase, E., Schmidt, T. & Perry, K. L. (2000). The structure of cucumber mosaic virus and comparison to cowpea chlorotic mottle virus. J Virol 74, 7578–7586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Suzuki, M., Kuwata, S., Kataoka, J., Masuta, C., Nitta, N. & Takanami, Y. (1991). Functional analysis of deletion mutants of cucumber mosaic virus RNA3 using an in vitro transcription system. Virology 183, 106–113.[CrossRef][Medline]

Taliansky, M. E. & García-Arenal, F. (1995). Role of cucumovirus capsid protein in long-distance movement within the infected plant. J Virol 69, 916–922.[Abstract]

Thompson, J. R. & García-Arenal, F. (1998). The bundle sheath-phloem interface of Cucumis sativus is a boundary for systemic infection by tomato aspermy virus. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 11, 109–114.

Vaquero, C., Turner, A. P., Demangeat, G., Sanz, A., Serra, M. T., Roberts, K. & García-Luque, I. (1994). The 3a protein from cucumber mosaic virus increases the gating capacity of plasmodesmata in transgenic tobacco plants. J Gen Virol 75, 3193–3197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received 26 January 2006; accepted 7 March 2006.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
L. F. Pacios and F. Garcia-Arenal
Comparison of properties of particles of Cucumber mosaic virus and Tomato aspermy virus based on the analysis of molecular surfaces of capsids
J. Gen. Virol., July 1, 2006; 87(7): 2073 - 2083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Llamas, S.
Right arrow Articles by García-Arenal, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Llamas, S.
Right arrow Articles by García-Arenal, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Llamas, S.
Right arrow Articles by García-Arenal, F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS