|
|
||||||||
Short Communication |
1 Laboratory of Biomedicine, Center of Biomedical Research, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
2 The Avian Zoonoses Research Center, Faculty of Agriculture, Tottori University, Tottori 680-8553, Japan
3 Laboratory of Animal Experiment for Disease Model, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0815, Japan
4 Sankyo Labo Service Corporation, Tokyo 132-0023, Japan
5 France Hybrides, Saint-Jean-de-Braye, France
Correspondence
Etsuro Ono
etsuro{at}qda.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| MAIN TEXT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, we reported that transgenic mouse lines expressing a soluble form of the first Ig-like domain of porcine nectin-1 (PHveC-VpIg; VpIg), consisting of the first Ig-like domain and the Fc portion of porcine IgG, showed significant resistance to PRV infection (Ono et al., 2006
). However, these animals were less resistant overall than transgenic mice expressing the entire ectodomain of porcine nectin-1 fused to the Fc portion of human IgG1, indicating that the two C domains of nectin-1 both have roles in antiviral potential. However, different Fc portions may affect the in vivo effects. There is a possibility that the primary effect of the fusion protein is to bind to the virus and promote its clearance. We cannot exclude the possibility that there may be functional differences between whole human and porcine Fc portions, when placed in the context of a murine immune system. Based on these findings, we aimed to investigate the role of the second and third domains and the effects of Fc portions from different species in antiviral potential against PRV infection. Here, we generated transgenic mouse lines expressing a soluble form of porcine nectin-1 (PHveCpIg; VCCpIg), consisting of the entire ectodomain and the Fc portion of porcine IgG.
The cDNA of the entire domain of porcine nectin-1 was amplified by PCR under conditions described previously (Ono et al., 2004a
), in which pCXN2/PHveCIg (Ono et al., 2004a
) was used as a template. The PCR primers used to amplify the cDNA were 5'-GGACCCCTCGAGCGCCATGGCT-3' and 5'-CTGAGCGGATCCGTGTTCGGGAGGAGACGGGGTGTA-3'. The cDNA was inserted into the plasmid carrying the porcine IgG–Fc cDNA (Ono et al., 2006
). Then, the fragment containing the chimeric gene, encoding a fusion protein (PHveCpIg) consisting of the entire ectodomain of porcine nectin-1 and the Fc portion of porcine IgG, was inserted into the pCXN2 vector (Niwa et al., 1991
). The transgene fragment containing the CAG promoter (cytomegalovirus immediate-early enhancer and chicken
-actin promoter), the PHveCpIg gene and the rabbit
-globin poly(A) signal was microinjected into C57BL/6 mouse eggs to generate transgenic mice. Three founder mice (PHveCpIg150, 151 and 185) carrying the transgene were identified by PCR analysis of their tail DNA. All founders gave rise to offspring in crosses with wild-type C57BL/6 mice and transmitted the introduced gene in a Mendelian fashion. The transgenic mouse lines PHveCIg22, 32 and 37 (Ono et al., 2004a
), expressing a soluble form of the entire ectodomain of porcine nectin-1 fused to the human Fc portion, and the transgenic mouse lines PHveC-VpIg21, 30 and 72 (Ono et al., 2006
), expressing a soluble form of the first Ig-like domain fused to the porcine Fc portion, were used for comparison of the resistance to PRV infection. A schematic representation of each fusion protein is shown in Fig. 1(a)
. All mice were maintained in the animal facility at our institute and treated according to the Laboratory Animal Control Guidelines of our institute, which conform to those of the US National Institutes of Health.
|
|
To find out whether the transgenic mice expressing VCCpIg were protected from PRV infection, transgenic and non-transgenic offspring were infected intraperitoneally with 20, 100 or 1000 LD50 PRV strain YS-81. The LD50 was determined as described previously (Ono et al., 2004b
). The survival data are summarized in Fig. 3
. Significant protection was observed in all of the lines: 82 % (nine of 11), 100 % (12 of 12), and 90 % (nine of ten) of the animals from lines 150, 151 and 185 survived, respectively. In contrast, approximately 90 % (111 of 122) of all control littermates died within 14 days. This resistance was confirmed to a slightly lower extent in more severe intraperitoneal challenges. Intraperitoneal inoculation with 100 LD50 was lethal for 95 % of all control mice (113 of 119 non-transgenic littermates died), whereas 73 % (16 of 22), 83 % (10 of 12) and 64 % (nine of 14) of the animals from lines 150, 151 and 185 survived, respectively. In addition, the challenge with 1000 LD50 was lethal for >98 % of all control mice (119 of 121 non-transgenic littermates died), whereas 57 % (16 of 28), 75 % (nine of 12) and 71 % (10 of 14) of the animals from lines 150, 151 and 185 survived, respectively. As PRV usually enters the body in pigs via infection of mucosal epithelium, intranasal challenges with PRV were performed. PRV (10 LD50) was inoculated intranasally into the transgenic mice and their non-transgenic littermates. This challenge was lethal for >90 % of all control mice (132 of 145 non-transgenic littermates died), whereas 70 % (seven of ten), 57 % (12 of 21) and 50 % (five of ten) of the animals from lines 150, 151 and 185 survived, respectively (approx. 60 % mean survival rate across lines). The data demonstrate that all transgenic mouse lines showed significant resistance to PRV infection.
|
To compare the effects of the entire ectodomain and the first Ig-like domain fused to the porcine Fc portion on antiviral potential, three transgenic mouse lines (PHveC-VpIg 21, 30 and 72) expressing VpIg were used for experimental infection. The survival data demonstrate that they showed lower resistance to PRV challenge with 100 LD50; survival rates of approximately 40 % for each line, although these were statistically significantly different from the results after challenge with 20 LD50 [survival rates of 86 % (12 of 14), 60 % (nine of 15) and 100 % (nine of nine) for lines 21, 30 and 72, respectively], consistent with a previous study (Ono et al., 2006
). Furthermore, it was especially noteworthy that almost no protection was observed in the challenge with 1000 LD50; only two of 27 mice survived the challenge. Consistent with earlier studies, they showed lower resistance to the intranasal challenge: approximately 40 % on average across lines [survival rates of 56 % (nine of 16), 55 % (six of 11) and 18 % (three of 17) for lines 21, 30 and 72, respectively]. Taken together, the antiviral potential of VpIg is weaker than that of VCCpIg (mean survival rates: 79 % in VpIg versus 90 % in VCCpIg for intraperitoneal challenge with 20 LD50; 40 versus 73 % for 100 LD50; 7 versus 68 % for 1000 LD50; 40 versus 60 % for the intranasal challenge with 10 LD50). Direct comparison of the effects of the entire ectodomain and the first Ig-like domain fused to the porcine Fc portion demonstrates that the second and third Ig-like domains enhance the antiviral effect against PRV infection.
There may be several explanations for the roles of the second and third Ig-like domains in antiviral potential in the transgenic mice. Firstly, the two C-like domains provide a certain degree of flexibility to the first Ig-like domain for suitable interaction with gD, and/or enhance the binding affinity to gD. It is known that the second and third C-like domains of nectin-1 increase the efficiency of entry of HSV-1 gD (Cocchi et al., 1998a
). Secondly, the two domains may be concerned with stability and/or turnover of the molecule.
In the present study, mice transgenic for a chimera that carried the entire ectodomain of nectin-1 were more resistant to PRV infection than those transgenic for a chimera that carried the first Ig-like domain. Furthermore, the human Fc portion rendered the mice slightly more resistant to challenge than those that carried the porcine IgG. These findings indicate that the PHveCIg gene (VCChIg) is the best among the pseudorabies-resistant transgenes encoding different soluble forms of porcine nectin-1 in transgenic mice.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Campadelli-Fiume, G., Cocchi, F., Menotti, L. & Lopez, M. (2000). The novel receptors that mediate the entry of herpes simplex viruses and animal alphaherpesviruses into cells. Rev Med Virol 10, 305–319.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cocchi, F., Lopez, M., Menotti, L., Aoubala, M., Dubreuil, P. & Campadelli-Fiume, G. (1998a). The V domain of herpesvirus Ig-like receptor (HigR) contains a major functional region in herpes simplex virus-1 entry into cells and interacts physically with the viral glycoprotein D. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 15700–15705.
Cocchi, F., Menotti, L., Mirandola, P., Lopez, M. & Campadelli-Fiume, G. (1998b). The ectodomain of a novel member of the immunoglobulin subfamily related to the poliovirus receptor has the attribute of a bona fide receptor for herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in human cells. J Virol 72, 9992–10002.
Cocchi, F., Lopez, M., Dubreuil, P., Campadelli-Fiume, G. & Menotti, L. (2001). Chimeric nectin 1-poliovirus receptor molecules identify a nectin 1 region functional in herpes simplex virus entry. J Virol 75, 7987–7994.
Fabre, S., Reymond, N., Cocchi, F., Menotti, L., Dubreuil, P., Campadelli-Fiume, G. & Lopez, M. (2002). Prominent role of the Ig-like V domain in trans-interactions of nectins. Nectin3 and nectin 4 bind to the predicted C–C'-C''-D
-strands of the nectin1 V domain. J Biol Chem 277, 27006–27013.
Forrester, A., Farrell, H., Wilkinson, G., Kaye, J., Davis-Poynter, N. & Minson, T. (1992). Construction and properties of a mutant of herpes simplex virus type 1 with glycoprotein H coding sequence deleted. J Virol 66, 341–348.
Geraghty, R. J., Krummenacher, C., Eisenberg, R. J., Cohen, G. H. & Spear, P. G. (1998). Entry of alphaherpesviruses mediated by poliovirus receptor related protein 1 and polioviris receptor. Science 280, 1618–1620.
Herold, B. C., Visalli, R. J., Susmarski, N., Brandt, C. R. & Spear, P. G. (1994). Glycoprotein C-independent binding of herpes simplex virus to cells requires cell surface heparan sulphate and glycoprotein B. J Gen Virol 75, 1211–1222.
Krummenacher, C., Rux, A. H., Whitbeck, J. C., Ponce de Leon, M., Lou, H., Baribaud, I., Hou, W., Zou, C., Geraghty, R. J. & other authors (1999). The first immunoglobulin-like domain of HveC is sufficient to bind herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D with full affinity, while the third domain is involved in oligomerization of HveC. J Virol 73, 8127–8137.
Krummenacher, C., Baribaud, I., Ponce de Leon, M., Whitbeck, J. C., Lou, H., Cohen, G. H. & Eisenberg, R. J. (2000). Localization of a binding site for herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D on herpesvirus entry mediator C by using antireceptor monoclonal antibodies. J Virol 74, 10863–10872.
Krummenacher, C., Baribaud, I., Sanzo, J. F., Cohen, G. H. & Eisenberg, R. J. (2002). Effects of herpes simplex virus on structure and function of nectin-1/HveC. J Virol 76, 2424–2433.
Ligas, M. W. & Johnson, D. C. (1988). A herpes simplex virus mutant in which glycoprotein D sequences are replaced by
-galactosidase sequences binds to but is unable to penetrate into cells. J Virol 62, 1486–1494.
Mettenleiter, T. C., Zsak, L., Zuckermann, F., Sugg, N., Kern, H. & Ben-Porat, T. (1990). Interaction of glycoprotein gIII with a cellular heparin-like substance mediates adsorption of pseudorabies virus. J Virol 64, 278–286.
Miyahara, M., Nakanishi, H., Takahashi, K., Satoh-Horikawa, K., Tachibana, K. & Takai, Y. (2000). Interaction of nectin with afadin is necessary for its clustering at cell-cell contact sites but not for its cis dimerization or trans interaction. J Biol Chem 275, 613–618.
Momose, Y., Honda, T., Inagaki, M., Shimizu, K., Irie, K., Nakanishi, H. & Takai, Y. (2002). Role of the second immunoglobulin-like loop of nectin in cell-cell adhesion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293, 45–49.[CrossRef][Medline]
Niwa, H., Yamamura, K. & Miyazaki, J. (1991). Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene 108, 193–200.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ono, E., Amagai, K., Taharaguchi, S., Tomioka, Y., Yoshino, S., Watanabe, Y., Cherel, P., Houdebine, L.-M., Adam, M. & other authors (2004a). Transgenic mice expressing a soluble form of porcine nectin-1/HveC as a model for pseudorabies-resistant livestock. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 16150–16155.
Ono, E., Yoshino, S., Amagai, K., Taharaguchi, S., Kimura, C., Morimoto, J., Inobe, M., Uenishi, T. & Uede, T. (2004b). Enhanced resistance to herpes simplex virus type 1 infection in transgenic mice expressing a soluble form of herpesvirus entry mediator. Virology 320, 267–275.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ono, E., Tomioka, Y., Watanabe, Y., Amagai, K., Taharaguchi, S., Glenisson, J. & Cherel, P. (2006). The first immunoglobulin-like domain of porcine nectin-1 is sufficient to confer resistance to pseudorabies virus infection in transgenic mice. Arch Virol 151, 1827–1839.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roop, C., Hutchinson, L. & Johnson, D. C. (1993). A mutant herpes simplex virus type 1 unable to express glycoprotein L cannot enter cells, and its particles lack glycoprotein H. J Virol 67, 2285–2297.
Shieh, M.-T., WuDunn, D., Montgomery, R. I., Esko, J. D. & Spear, P. G. (1992). Cell surface receptors for herpes simplex virus are heparan sulfate proteoglycans. J Cell Biol 116, 1273–1281.
Spear, P. G., Eisenberg, R. J. & Cohen, G. H. (2000). Three classes of cell surface receptors for alphaherpesvirus entry. Virology 275, 1–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
Struyf, F., Plate, A. E. & Spear, P. G. (2005). Deletion of the second immunoglobulin-like domain of nectin-1 alters its intracellular processing and localization and ability to mediate entry of herpes simplex virus. J Virol 79, 3841–3845.
WuDunn, D. & Spear, P. G. (1989). Initial interaction of herpes simplex virus with cells is binding to heparan sulfate. J Virol 63, 52–58.
Received 13 April 2007;
accepted 15 June 2007.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |