J Gen Virol Try Microbiology Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 88 (2007), 2307-2311; DOI 10.1099/vir.0.82981-0

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Servan de Almeida, R.
Right arrow Articles by Albina, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Servan de Almeida, R.
Right arrow Articles by Albina, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Servan de Almeida, R.
Right arrow Articles by Albina, E.

Short Communication

Control of ruminant morbillivirus replication by small interfering RNA

Renata Servan de Almeida, Djénéba Keita, Geneviève Libeau and Emmanuel Albina

CIRAD, Département Systèmes Biologiques, UR-15, Campus International de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier, France

Correspondence
Renata Servan de Almeida
renata.almeida{at}cirad.fr


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
MAIN TEXT
REFERENCES
 
Peste-des-petits-ruminants virus (PPRV) and rinderpest virus (RPV) are two morbilliviruses of economic relevance in African and Asian countries. Although efficient vaccines are available for both diseases, they cannot protect the animals before 14 days post-vaccination. In emergencies, it would be desirable to have efficient therapeutics for virus control. Here, two regions are described in the nucleocapsid genes of PPRV and RPV that can be targeted efficiently by synthetic short interfering RNAs (siRNAs), resulting in a >80 % reduction in virus replication. The effects of siRNAs on the production of viral RNA by real-time quantitative PCR, of viral proteins by flow cytometry and of virus particles by appreciation of the cytopathic effect and virus titration were monitored. The findings of this work highlight the potential for siRNA molecules to be developed as therapeutic agents for the treatment of PPRV and RPV infections.


   MAIN TEXT
TOP
ABSTRACT
MAIN TEXT
REFERENCES
 
Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) and rinderpest (RP) are highly contagious viral diseases of domestic and wild ruminants that induce high morbidity and mortality. Both viruses [peste-des-petits-ruminants virus (PPRV) and rinderpest virus (RPV)] can infect large and small ruminant species, although RPV causes disease mainly in large ruminants (such as cattle, buffalo and yaks), whereas PPRV infects mainly small ruminants (e.g. goats and sheep). Clinically, the diseases are very similar and are characterized by pyrexia, oculonasal discharges, progressive development of necrotic stomatitis, gastroenteritis and death. PPRV and RPV are members of the genus Morbillivirus in the family Paramyxoviridae, a genus that also includes Measles virus. Described for the first time in the early 1940s in west Africa (Gargadennec & Lalanne, 1942Down), PPRV has now become endemic in west, central and eastern Africa, in the Middle East and in south-west Asia (Lefèvre & Diallo, 1990; Shaila et al., 1996Down). RP has also caused devastating losses of ruminant populations in Africa, Europe and Asia for several centuries (Rweyemamu & Cheneau, 1995Down). Despite large eradication campaigns, this disease remains endemic in some areas of the Somalian ecosystem.

Given their animal health and economic relevance, it is of major interest to control PPR and RP efficiently. Extensive studies on vaccination of ruminants against both diseases have been carried out and have shown the economic advantages of this practice. However, the current vaccines are only preventive tools that induce a protective immune response before the animals are infected. A curative tool should therefore be developed that could help in the control of virus replication when animals are newly infected or are at high risk of becoming infected in the next few days. A promising approach is the possibility to knock down the expression of virus genes by the mechanism of RNA interference (RNAi).

RNAi is a process whereby introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) into cells results in the degradation of homologous mRNA and, consequently, post-transcriptional gene silencing (Fire et al., 1998Down; Hammond et al., 2001Down; Hannon, 2002Down). The dsRNA is processed into 21–25 nt short interfering RNA (siRNAs) with 2 nt 3' overhangs by the RNase III-like protein DICER in an initiation phase. Afterwards, the cleavage products are separated into single-stranded RNA and incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). RISC, which consists of several proteins and the antisense strand of siRNA, mediates the recognition and cleavage of its mRNA target.

In this study, we tested chemically synthesized siRNAs targeting the nucleocapsid (N) genes of PPRV and RPV for specific inhibition of virus replication. As indicators of siRNA functionality, we measured reduction in viral RNA and protein expression, reduction in virus particle production and the cytopathic effects induced in infected cell culture. Our strategy for siRNA design was to target conserved regions of the N gene among different morbilliviruses identified on multiple alignments of the N gene sequences. Within these regions, 19 nt long siRNAs were designed, taking into account different criteria, including a 35–60 mol% G+C content of the duplex and the presence of specific bases in strategic positions (Amarzguioui & Prydz, 2004Down; Reynolds et al., 2004Down; Ui-Tei et al., 2004Down; Huesken et al., 2005Down). All designed siRNAs were purchased from Ambion. First, five siRNAs specific for the N gene of PPRV were tested (NPPRV5 sense, 5'-GAGAACUCAAUUCAGAACAtt-3', position 1001–1019; NPPRV6 sense, 5'-GGCGGUUCAUGGUAUCUCUtt-3', position 741–759; NPPRV7 sense, 5'-GCAUUAGGCCUUCACGAGUtt-3', position 899–917; NPPRV8 sense, 5'-GUAUCAACAGCUAGGAGAGtt-3', position 958–976; and NPPRV9 sense, 5'-GAACUUUGGCAGGUCAUAUtt-3', position 1102–1120). Afterwards, the regions silenced efficiently on PPRV (functional regions) were evaluated on RPV, using siRNAs homologous to the N gene of RPV (NRPV6 sense, 5'-GCAGAUUUAUGGUGGCAUUtt-3', position 741–759; and NRPV7 sense, 5'-GCACUGGGCCUGCAUGAAUtt-3', position 899–917).

To assess the antiviral activity of the siRNA sequences, Vero cells [European Collection of Cell Cultures (ECACC) 84113001] with 48 h growth were trypsinized and plated at 1x105 cells per well in 24-well plates. Twenty-four hours later, different final concentrations of siRNAs (100, 50, 25 and 12.5 nM) were complexed with 2 µg Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) per well in 100 µl OptiMEM I serum-free medium (Invitrogen). After 20 min incubation at room temperature, the siRNA–Lipofectamine 2000 complexes were added to cell-culture wells containing 200 µl MEM serum-free medium. Plates were incubated for 6 h at 37 °C with 5 % CO2 and then the well supernatant was replaced with 1 ml MEM supplemented with 5 % fetal bovine serum. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were infected by using an m.o.i. of 0.1 of either PPRV or RPV. Four days later, the siRNA silencing effect was evaluated by observation of cytopathogenic effect (CPE) and flow cytometry. CPE scores were defined as (+) for a CPE ≤10 %, (++) for a CPE between 10 and 50 % and (+++) for a CPE >50 %. Virus titration and real-time PCR were also carried out for functional siRNAs identified by the two previous methods. Inhibition levels of 70 % for flow cytometry and 50 % for CPE were established as cut-off values for siRNA efficacy. Controls were done by using irrelevant siRNAs and non-transfected cells. Viral proteins in infected cells were labelled by using specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the N proteins of PPRV and RPV, the matrix (M) protein of PPRV and the fusion (F) protein of RPV, and a secondary fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated antibody. In brief, cells were trypsinized and plated in 96-well plates. mAbs specific for each of the viral proteins were diluted appropriately and added to each well. After 30 min incubation at 4 °C and two washing steps, cells were incubated for 30 min at 4 °C with a second FITC-conjugated antibody (Bio-Rad). Finally, cells were washed and fixed with 1 % paraformaldehyde. All dilutions and washings were carried out using a PBS solution containing 0.015–0.025 % saponin for cell permeabilization and intracellular staining. Silencing of viral protein production by siRNAs was measured by microscopic observation of intracellular fluorescence and by flow cytometry using a FACSort (Becton Dickinson). To evaluate the reduction in infectious viral progeny, supernatants from siRNA-transfected and virus-infected cultures were recovered and subsequently titrated by TCID50 assay in Vero cells as described by Reed & Muench (1938)Down. Total cellular and viral RNA was isolated from siRNA-transfected and virus-infected Vero cells by using an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). RT-PCR and quantitative PCR were carried out in one step by using a Brilliant SYBR green QRT-PCR Master Mix kit, One-Step (Stratagene), according to the manufacturer's protocols. The primers for the N gene of PPRV were NP3bis, 5'-GTCTCGGAAATCGCCTCACAG-3' (forward, position 1232–1252), and NP4bis, 5'-CCTCCTCCTGGTCCTCCAGAA-3' (reverse, position 1563–1583). The primers for the N gene of RPV were NP 223, 5'-AGCATCTTATCACTGTTTGTC-3' (forward, position 275–295), and NP 388r bis, 5'-ATCTATCAGCCTCGTCATC-3' (reverse, position 420–438). Each reaction mixture contained 12.5 µl 2x SYBR QRT-PCR master mix, 100 nM each primer, 0.0625 µl StrataScript reverse transcriptase, 1 µl sample and water up to 25 µl. For relative RNA quantification, an external standard curve was created by using spectrophotometrically determined copy-number standards of plasmid pBluescript or pcDNA4/HisMax B containing the N gene of PPRV or RPV, respectively. Real-time PCR was carried out in an Mx 3000 cycler (Stratagene) using the following thermal-cycling profile: 50 °C for 30 min, 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 35 cycles of amplification (95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 30 s) and a final cycle of 95 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 30 s, 95 °C for 30 s. All samples were run in duplicate.

The results of the siRNA activity assay demonstrate that siRNAs NPPRV6 and NPPRV7, targeting two conserved regions of PPRV, clearly inhibited the replication of PPRV, as assessed by the marked decrease in CPE and immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 1Down), viral protein, viral titres and viral RNA. Flow cytometry showed a dramatic decrease of >80 % in fluorescence staining in cells treated with these siRNAs (Fig. 2Down). Production of PPRV progeny was shut down efficiently by approximately 100-fold in cells treated with the siRNAs NPPRV6 and NPPRV7, as demonstrated by virus titration. These siRNAs also caused an approximately 20- to 50-fold decrease in copy number of virus target genes, as demonstrated by real-time PCR (Fig. 3Down). Additionally, we have demonstrated that siRNAs NRPV6 and NRPV7, targeting the same conserved regions of the N gene of RPV, clearly inhibited replication of RPV, as assessed by the marked decrease in CPE (Fig. 1Down) and viral protein (Fig. 2Down), a reduction of >1000-fold in RPV titre and of 10- to 70-fold in RPV RNA copy number (Fig. 3Down).


Figure 1
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Analyses of siRNA functionality, as measured by microscopic observation. (a) siRNA effects were initially evaluated by observation of CPE. Scores were (+) for a CPE ≤10 %, (++) for a CPE between 10 and 50 % and (+++) for a CPE >50 %. (b) CPE formation was prevented markedly in cells transfected with the siRNA sequences. Viral proteins in infected cells were labelled by using specific mAbs against the N proteins of PPRV and RPV, the M protein of PPRV and the F protein of RPV, and a secondary FITC-conjugated antibody. Silencing of viral protein production by siRNAs, which was also inhibited strongly, was measured by observation of intracellular fluorescence.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Downregulation of viral N protein expression level by siRNAs. Expression of the N protein was quantified by flow cytometry in five independent experiments at 4 days post-infection in Vero cells transfected with an optimal dilution of siRNA, as described in the text. Generation of viral N protein was reduced markedly, as shown by quantification of intracellular fluorescence. The cut-off established at 30 % is indicated by the vertical dotted line. Filled bars, PPRV siRNAs; empty bars, RPV siRNAs.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Production of viral N gene transcripts (bars) and viral progeny ({blacktriangleup}, PPRV; {blacksquare}, RPV) was shut down efficiently, as demonstrated by real-time PCR and virus titration. The RNAs from three independent experiments were analysed. The siRNAs were transfected by using their optimal dilution, as described in the text.

 
To define the exact limits of the functional regions, 19 nt long siRNAs overlapping by 1 or 2 nt up- or downstream were tested. The activity of these new siRNAs was evaluated by using flow cytometry. For PPRV, we observed that the displacement of 1 or 2 nt reduced the effect on virus N protein expression considerably (data not shown). The same applied for RPV. However siRNA NRPV7+1 (position 900–918), targeting a position with a displacement of 1 nt downstream compared with siRNA NRPV7, showed an increased inhibitory effect on RPV (data not shown). Thus, the active sequence 7 on the RPV N gene appeared to be displaced by 1 nt in the 3' direction with respect to the PPRV N gene. This improved effect with siRNA NRP7+1 could be the direct result of 1 nt displacement downstream, creating three additional sequence motifs positively associated with siRNA functionality that have been proposed previously (U10, S11 and U18; Amarzguioui & Prydz, 2004Down; Reynolds et al., 2004Down; Yoshinari et al., 2004Down; Huesken et al., 2005Down; Jagla et al., 2005Down; Pekarik, 2005Down; Shabalina et al., 2006Down), despite the loss of two others (A3 and A6; Amarzguioui & Prydz, 2004Down; Reynolds et al., 2004Down; Schubert et al., 2005Down; Pekarik, 2005Down). However, this study does not suggest that motifs U10, S11 and U18 guarantee siRNA activity; rather, we propose that special attention should be paid to these motifs, which may contribute substantially to siRNA functionality. Alternatively, the better activity of NRPV7+1 could also be the consequence of the addition of an A/U base pair at the 5' end of the antisense strand. This could result in decreased thermodynamic stability at this terminus, thus facilitating the selective incorporation of this strand into the RISC (Khvorova et al., 2003Down; Schwarz et al., 2003Down; Heale et al., 2005Down; Hutvagner, 2005Down; Shabalina et al., 2006Down).

The morbillivirus genome is a single, negative-stranded RNA molecule wrapped intimately in the N protein. The resultant nucleoprotein complex associates with the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase subunits to initiate intracellular virus replication. However, the nucleocapsid, rather than the free genome RNA, is the template for all RNA synthesis (Lamb & Parks, 2007Down). As the N protein is essential for paramyxovirus replication, it would be a good target for the RNAi strategy to inhibit replication of morbilliviruses. Indeed, we demonstrated in the present study that siRNAs targeting selected regions of N mRNA of PPRV and RPV inhibited replication of the viruses effectively in infected cell cultures, as evidenced by the results described above. Moreover, the fact that the N protein plays an essential role in paramyxovirus replication was supported by the reduced expression of the M protein of PPRV and the F protein of RPV. The siRNAs NPPRV6 and NPPRV7 inhibited expression of the M protein by 85 and 83 %, respectively, whereas siRNAs RPV6, RPV7 and RPV7+1 inhibited expression of the fusion protein of RPV by 83, 81 and 86 %, respectively (data not shown).

All inhibitory sequences showed specific activity, as the siRNAs directed against the PPRV genome did not show any inhibitory effect on RPV and vice versa (data not shown). The effect of all functional siRNAs was sustained for 5 days after siRNA administration, given that their antiviral activity was always verified after this interval. Four of five functional siRNAs presented a dose-dependent activity, but siRNA NRPV6 was more effective when weaker concentrations were used. This means that, above certain concentrations of siRNA, no further increase in effect can be achieved. The same behaviour was described by Far & Sczakiel (2003)Down when they used siRNA directed against ICAM-1 mRNA in a human endothelial cell line. Quantitative analyses have suggested that this phenomenon occurs because the siRNA effect may reach a plateau with increasing siRNA concentration, indicating that RISC in cells is saturable (Barik, 2004Down).

Our group has selectively inhibited the N genes of PPRV and RPV by using synthetic siRNAs directed against one gene region (position 480–498; D. Keita, R. Servan de Almeida, G. Libeau & E. Albina, unpublished data). Here, we have identified two novel regions in the N genes of PPRV and RPV. The most effective inhibition of virus expression was observed with siRNA NPPRV6 for PPRV and siRNA NRPV7+1 for RPV. All of these defined siRNAs may be used alone or in association for targeting multiple viral regions in order to prevent the emergence of escape mutants. The application of RNAi as an in vivo therapy requires an efficient delivery of siRNA to the appropriate tissues. For this purpose, plasmids or viral vectors, both expressing short hairpin RNA specific for virus genes, may be administered. Currently, we are studying delivery methods of siRNAs to be applied in infected animals.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This research was supported by a Marie Curie International Fellowship within the Sixth European Community Framework Programme.


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
MAIN TEXT
REFERENCES
 
Amarzguioui, M. & Prydz, H. (2004). An algorithm for selection of functional siRNA sequences. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 316, 1050–1058.[CrossRef][Medline]

Barik, S. (2004). Control of nonsegmented negative-strand RNA virus replication by siRNA. Virus Res 102, 27–35.[CrossRef][Medline]

Far, R. K.-K. & Sczakiel, G. (2003). The activity of siRNA in mammalian cells is related to structural target accessibility: a comparison with antisense oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res 31, 4417–4424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E. & Mello, C. C. (1998). Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391, 806–811.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gargadennec, L. & Lalanne, A. (1942). La peste des petits ruminants. Bull Serv Zootechnol Epizoot Afr Occid 5, 16–21 (in French).

Hammond, S. M., Caudy, A. A. & Hannon, G. J. (2001). Post-transcriptional gene silencing by double-stranded RNA. Nat Rev Genet 2, 110–119.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hannon, G. J. (2002). RNA interference. Nature 418, 244–251.[CrossRef][Medline]

Heale, B. S. E., Soifer, H. S., Bowers, C. & Rossi, J. J. (2005). siRNA target site secondary structure predictions using local stable substructures. Nucleic Acids Res 33, e30[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Huesken, D., Lange, J., Mickanin, C., Weiler, J., Asselbergs, F., Warner, J., Meloon, B., Engel, S., Rosenberg, A. & other authors (2005). Design of a genome-wide siRNA library using an artificial neural network. Nat Biotechnol 23, 995–1001.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hutvagner, G. (2005). Small RNA asymmetry in RNAi: function in RISC assembly and gene regulation. FEBS Lett 579, 5850–5857.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jagla, B., Aulner, N., Kelly, P. D., Song, D., Volchuk, A., Zatorski, A., Shum, D., Mayer, T., Angelis, D. & other authors (2005). Sequence characteristics of functional siRNAs. RNA 11, 864–872.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Khvorova, A., Reynolds, A. & Jayasena, S. D. (2003). Functional siRNAs and miRNAs exhibit strand bias. Cell 115, 209–216.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lamb, R. A. & Parks, G. D. (2007). Paramyxoviridae: the viruses and their replication. In Fields Virology, 5th edn, vol. 1, pp. 1449–1496. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Lefèvre, P. C. & Diallo, A. (1991). Peste des petits ruminants. Rev Sci Tech O I E (Off Int Epizoot) 9, 951–965 (in French).

Pekarik, V. (2005). Design of shRNA for RNAi – a lesson from pre-miRNA processing: possible clinical applications. Brain Res Bull 68, 115–120.[CrossRef][Medline]

Reed, L. J. & Muench, H. A. A. (1938). A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am J Trop Med Hyg 27, 493–497.

Reynolds, A., Leake, D., Boese, Q., Scaringe, S., Marshall, W. S. & Khvorova, A. (2004). Rational siRNA design for RNA interference. Nat Biotechnol 22, 326–330.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rweyemamu, M. M. & Cheneau, Y. (1995). Strategy for the global rinderpest eradication programme. Vet Microbiol 44, 369–376.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schubert, S., Grünweller, A., Erdmann, V. A. & Kurreck, J. (2005). Local RNA target structure influences siRNA efficacy: systematic analysis of intentionally designed binding regions. J Mol Biol 348, 883–893.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schwarz, D. S., Hutvágner, G., Du, T., Xu, Z., Aronin, N. & Zamore, P. D. (2003). Asymmetry in the assembly of the RNAi enzyme complex. Cell 115, 199–208.[CrossRef][Medline]

Shabalina, S., Spiridonov, A. N. & Ogurstov, A. Y. (2006). Computational models with thermodynamic and composition features improve siRNA design. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 65[CrossRef][Medline]

Shaila, M. S., Shamaki, D., Forsyth, M. A., Diallo, A., Goatley, L., Kitching, R. P. & Barrett, T. (1996). Geographic distribution and epidemiology of peste des petits ruminants viruses. Virus Res 43, 149–153.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ui-Tei, K., Naito, Y., Takahashi, F., Haragushi, T., Ohki-Hamazaki, H., Juni, A., Ueda, R. & Saigo, K. (2004). Guidelines for the selection of highly effective siRNA sequences for mammalian and chick RNA interference. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 936–948.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yoshinari, K., Miyagishi, M. & Taira, K. (2004). Effects on RNAi of the tight structure, sequence and position of the targeted region. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 691–699.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received 7 March 2007; accepted 25 April 2007.



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Servan de Almeida, R.
Right arrow Articles by Albina, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Servan de Almeida, R.
Right arrow Articles by Albina, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Servan de Almeida, R.
Right arrow Articles by Albina, E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS