J Gen Virol Try Microbiology Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Gen Virol 89 (2008), 341-347; DOI 10.1099/vir.0.83344-0

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Courageot, M.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Vilette, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Courageot, M.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Vilette, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Courageot, M.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Vilette, D.

A cell line infectible by prion strains from different species

M.-P. Courageot1,{dagger}, N. Daude1,{ddagger}, R. Nonno2, S. Paquet1,§, M. A. Di Bari2, A. Le Dur1, J. Chapuis1, A. F. Hill3, U. Agrimi2, H. Laude1 and D. Vilette1,||

1 Virologie et Immunologie Moléculaires, INRA, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
2 Department of Food Safety and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
3 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21, Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence
D. Vilette
d.vilette{at}envt.fr
H. Laude
hubert.laude{at}jouy.inra.fr


   ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
It has been shown previously that ovine prion protein (PrPC) renders rabbit epithelial RK13 cells permissive to the multiplication of ovine prions, thus providing evidence that species barriers can be crossed in cultured cells through the expression of a relevant PrPC. The present study significantly extended this observation by showing that mouse and bank vole prions can be propagated in RK13 cells that express the corresponding PrPC. Importantly, the respective molecular patterns of abnormal PrP (PrPres) and, where examined, the neuropathological features of the infecting strains appeared to be maintained during the propagation in cell culture. These findings indicate that RK13 cells can be genetically engineered to replicate prion strains faithfully from different species. Such an approach may facilitate investigations of the molecular basis of strain identity and prion diversity.

{dagger}Present address: Laboratoire de Biologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, UFR des Sciences Exactes et Naturelles, Moulin de la Housse, BP 1039, 51687 Reims Cedex 2, France. Back

{ddagger}Present address: Prion Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2M8, Canada. Back

§Present address: Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Post Office Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia. Back

||Present address: UMR 1225, INRA/ENVT, 23 Chemin des Capelles, 31076 Toulouse, France. Back


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Whilst the host-encoded prion protein (PrPC) is essential for prion multiplication in cells (Daude et al., 2003Down) and tissues (Bueler et al., 1993Down), several lines of evidence indicate that PrPC expression is not sufficient to confer permissiveness to prion propagation (Enari et al., 2001Down; Raeber et al., 1999Down). Although several new permissive cell lines were recently identified, the number of cell models remains quite limited (for a review, see Vilette, 2007Down). More importantly, the ex vivo multiplication of a number of strains of particular interest has not yet been achieved. This suggests that prion multiplication may require strain-specific, PrPC-independent factors, the conjunction of which would be restricted to a few cell lines. Previous work has identified epithelial RK13 cells as an efficient and robust cell system for the multiplication of a natural strain of sheep scrapie, provided that these non-ovine cells expressed sheep PrPC (Rov cells; Vilette et al., 2001Down). Here, we have shown that RK13 cells genetically engineered to express rodent PrPC, either from the mouse or the bank vole, a species highly permissive to various prion isolates or strains (Cartoni et al., 2005Down; Chandler & Turfrey, 1972Down; Nonno et al., 2006Down), were readily infected by prions adapted to and propagated in these two species, thus extending the range of prion strains that can be multiplied in this cell-culture model.


   METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Reagents.
Dextran sulfate 500 (DS 500; Sigma) was prepared at a concentration of 5 mg ml–1 in PBS and stored at –20 °C. Aliquots were diluted in cell-culture medium and filter-sterilized before incubation with cells. Stock solutions of the amphotericin B derivative MS-8209 were dissolved at a concentration of 10 mg ml–1 in DMSO.

Generation of RK13 cells expressing mouse and vole PrPC.
The open reading frame (ORF) of vole PrPC was PCR amplified from bank vole (Myodes glareolus, formerly Clethrionomys glareolus) genomic DNA, cloned into pBluescript plasmid and verified by sequencing. The ORF encoding the vole PrPC with methionine at position 109 (Cartoni et al., 2005Down) was then subcloned into the pTRE plasmid (Clontech). The pTRE plasmid encoding the mouse PrPC (allele a) was provided by Dr S. Lehmann (Institut de Génétique Humaine, France). Each plasmid was introduced by transfection into RK13 cells as described previously (Vilette et al., 2001Down), and puromycin-resistant cell clones were selected and tested for doxycycline (dox)-inducible expression of PrPC. The data reported in this study with mouse (moRK13) and bank vole (voRK13) RK13 cells were obtained using clones #55 and #1/9, respectively, but similar findings were observed with other cell clones. The cultures were maintained at 37 °C in 6 % CO2 in Opti-MEM (Invitrogen/Gibco) supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum, 100 U penicillin ml–1 and 10 µg streptomycin ml–1. Cell lines were split by a 1 : 4 dilution every week. To induce expression of PrPC in the cell clones, 1 µg dox ml–1 was added to the culture medium.

Prion strains.
The murine strains Fukuoka-1 (Tateishi et al., 1979Down, originating from the laboratory of S. Katamine, Nagasaki, Japan), Chandler, 22L and ME7 (Bruce & Fraser, 1991Down, originating from the laboratory of R. Carp, Staten Island, NY, USA) were maintained in C57BL/6 mice. Transmission and stabilization of the natural sheep scrapie isolate Ss3 and of sheep bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) into bank voles have been described previously (Nonno et al., 2006Down; Piening et al., 2006Down). The survival times of bank voles serially infected with cattle BSE were similar to those of bank voles infected with sheep BSE (U. Agrimi, unpublished data). Infected brains were homogenized at 10 % (w/v) in a sterile 5 % glucose solution with a Ribolyser (Hybaid) and sonicated for 1–2 min before incubation with the cells.

Infection of RK13 cultures.
Confluent cultures grown for 2 days in single wells of 12-well plates in the presence of 1 µg dox ml–1 were incubated in culture medium containing 2.5 % infected brain homogenates. After 2 days, the medium was removed and the cells rinsed with PBS and split into two 25 cm2 flasks. Each week, one flask was used for subcultivation, whilst the other was used to prepare a cell lysate for PrP analysis.

Isolation and Western blot analysis of PrPres.
The isolation of cell-derived PrPres has been described previously (Paquet et al., 2004Down; Vilette et al., 2001Down). Briefly, cell cultures were solubilized in lysis buffer [50 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.4), 0.5 % Triton X-100, 0.5 % sodium deoxycholate]. Lysates were clarified (2000 r.p.m. for 1 min in a microcentrifuge) and cellular proteins were quantified by bicinchoninic acid using a BCA Protein Assay kit (Pierce). Identical amounts of cellular protein (500 µg) were digested with 2 µg proteinase K (PK) for 2 h at 37 °C in the presence of 0.02 % bromophenol blue for increased visualization of the pellets obtained after centrifugation. Pefabloc (4 mM) was added to stop the reaction and blue pellets containing aggregated PK-resistant PrP (PrPres) were collected by centrifugation at 13 000 r.p.m. in a microcentrifuge for 30 min at room temperature and separated by 12 % SDS-PAGE before transfer to nitrocellulose filters. In some experiments, pellets were treated with the endoglycosidase PNGaseF (New England Biolabs) prior to immunoblotting. For brain-derived PrPres analysis, 150–250 µg brain tissue equivalent was solubilized in lysis buffer. Clarification, PK digestion and PrPres recovery was as described for cell-derived PrPres.

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) 4F2 (Krasemann et al., 1996Down) recognizing the N-terminal region of PrPC was used to detect expression of full-length PrPC. As this antibody cannot react with N-terminally truncated PrPres, immunoblot analysis of abnormal PrP in PK-digested cell lysates and brain homogenates was performed with mAb Sha31 (Feraudet et al., 2005Down). Blots were developed using an ECL+ reagent kit (Amersham).

Pharmacological treatment of infected voRK13 cultures.
Infected voRK13 cultures were seeded in six-well plates in the presence of DS 500 (1 µg ml–1), MS-8209 (50 µg ml–1) or with vehicle only and incubated for 5 days with one medium change. The different treatments did not induce any obvious phenotypic effect, and after solubilization of the cultures, the protein concentration was similar in treated and untreated cultures. The same amount of cellular protein (250 µg) was digested with PK and analysed for PrPres levels by immunoblotting.

Bioassay.
Cultures were rinsed three times with PBS, scrapped into PBS and recovered by centrifugation. The cells were resuspended in a sterile 5 % glucose solution, frozen (–80 °C) and thawed four times, sonicated and stored at –80 °C until inoculation. MoRK13 and voRK13 cultures (20 µl) were inoculated intracerebrally into ovine transgenic tga20 mice (Fischer et al., 1996Down) and bank voles, respectively. Animals showing neurological signs were monitored almost daily and euthanized in extremis.

Histoblotting.
The procedure for histoblot analysis (Taraboulos et al., 1992Down) of tga20 mice was as described previously (Beringue et al., 2007Down).

Histopathology and paraffin-embedded tissue (PET) blots.
Each bank vole brain was divided into two parts by a sagittal paramedian cut. One was frozen for immunoblot analysis and further passages into vole, and the remaining part was embedded in paraffin. Lesion profiles were established using the first and the second passage of bank voles inoculated with vole-adapted sheep BSE agent serially propagated in voRK13 cells. PET blots were performed with the second vole passage. The procedures for the construction of lesion profiles and PET blot analysis have been described previously (Nonno et al., 2006Down).


   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Heterologous PrPC confers permissiveness in RK13 cells to various prion strains
For stable expression of PrPC from mouse and bank vole in RK13 cells, the ORF of PrPC from the corresponding species was cloned in a dox-inducible expression vector. Expression of mouse and bank vole PrPC in representative, stable RK13 transfectants is shown in Fig. 1Down. These data confirmed that RK13 cells did not express detectable levels of endogenous PrPC and established that PrPC from various species could be expressed efficiently in these cells.


Figure 1
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Expression of PrPC from different species in RK13 cells. Untransfected control RK13 cells or stably transfected clones of RK13 cells expressing the indicated PrPC were solubilized in sample buffer and analysed for PrPC expression by immunoblotting with mAb 4F2 recognizing PrPC from various species including rabbit (Vilette et al., 2001Down). A previously described RK13 clone expressing ovine PrPC (Rov9 clone) was included for comparison (lane 4). The sample in lane 2 is irrelevant to this study. The positions of molecular mass marker proteins (kDa) are indicated.

 
Permissiveness to prion multiplication was tested with three murine strains (Fukuoka-1, Chandler and ME7) and three sources of vole prions. One source of vole prions was a sheep scrapie isolate (Ss3) adapted to bank vole (Cartoni et al., 2005Down; Piening et al., 2006Down), whilst the other two were the BSE agent (either from cattle or from sheep, see Methods) serially transmitted to bank voles (Piening et al., 2006Down). Prior to exposure of the cell cultures, abnormal PrP (PrPres) in brain homogenates from the infected animals was analysed by immunoblotting. Fig. 2Down confirmed that PrPres can show strain-specific features. Brain-derived PrPres from strain Fukuoka-1 migrated more slowly than PrPres from strains Chandler and ME7 (Fig. 2aDown), as reported previously (Arima et al., 2005Down). PrPres from the BSE agent in bank vole had a higher electrophoretic mobility compared with that from Ss3 sheep scrapie (Fig. 2bDown), consistent with the unique pattern of BSE PrPres observed in different species (Beringue et al., 2006Down; Castilla et al., 2003Down; Eloit et al., 2005Down; Hill et al., 1997Down; Houston et al., 2000Down; Scott et al., 1997Down).


Figure 2
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Infection of RK13 cells by mouse and bank vole prion strains. Western blot analysis of PrPres with mAb Sha31 in the brains of mice (a) or bank voles (b), and in moRK13 cells (c) or voRK13 cells (d) infected with the indicated strains. (a, b) Infected brain homogenates were digested with PK and aliquots were deglycosylated or not by PNGaseF treatment and analysed by immunoblotting. M, Biotinylated molecular mass marker proteins (kDa). (c, d) RK13 cells exposed to the indicated strains were passaged each week and analysed periodically with mAb Sha31 for the presence of PrPres in PK-digested cell lysates. The typical results shown here were at seven (c) or four (d) passages post-infection. Expression of full-length PrPC was confirmed in the various infected cultures by immunoblotting with mAb 4F2 and is shown here for moRK13 cells in the left panel of (c). The positions of molecular mass marker proteins (kDa) are indicated.

 
The permissiveness of RK13 cultures was determined by incubating each strain with cells expressing the relevant PrPC. The cultures were then grown for up to 10 weeks and the accumulation of PrPres in the cultures was monitored regularly to assess successful and persistent infection. Control cultures inoculated and grown in the absence of dox, and thus expressing no detectable levels of PrPC, were analysed in parallel. Immunoblot analysis of PK-digested cell lysates showed that RK13 cells expressing the mouse PrPC (moRK13) persistently accumulated PrPres following exposure to the Fukuoka-1 and Chandler strains of mouse prions (Fig. 2cUp, lanes 1 and 3). Additional experiments indicated that PrPres was also readily detected in moRK13 cells exposed to the 22L strain of mouse prions (data not shown), whilst no PrPres was detectable in cultures exposed to ME7 (Fig. 2cUp, lane 2). Cell-derived PrPres was produced in voRK13 cells infected with the bank vole BSE agent originating from either cattle or sheep (Fig. 2dUp, lanes 2, 3, 6), whilst no PrPres was observed in voRK13 inoculated with the vole-adapted sheep scrapie Ss3 isolate (Fig. 2dUp, lane 1). In each case of successful transmission, no PrPres was observed when infections were carried out in the absence of dox. This demonstrated that no residual abnormal PrP from the inoculum was detected under these experimental conditions and that PrPres was produced de novo by the cells.

Our findings indicate that permissiveness of RK13 appears to be strain-specific. No PrPres was detected in voRK13 cells inoculated with Ss3 or in moRK13 cells exposed to the ME7 strain. This latter observation is reminiscent of previous observations with N2a and GT1, two cell lines permissive to the Chandler/RML strain but resistant to ME7 (Bosque & Prusiner, 2000Down; Klohn et al., 2003Down). However, successful multiplication of ME7 in other cell lines [e.g. SN56 (Baron et al., 2006Down), MG20 (Iwamaru et al., 2007Down) and L929 (Vorberg et al., 2004Down)] indicate that the cell tropism of prion multiplication observed in vivo can manifest in cultured cells.

To compare more accurately the electrophoretic mobility of abnormal PrP of these strains after propagation in culture, PrPres in moRK13 cells infected with strains Chandler and Fukuoka-1 and in voRK13 cells infected with vole-adapted BSE agent were deglycosylated by PNGaseF treatment and analysed by Western blotting. Fukuoka-1 PrPres retained a lower electrophoretic mobility compared with Chandler PrPres (Fig. 3Down, lanes 1 and 2), whilst PrPres generated in voRK13 cells infected with the vole-adapted BSE agent migrated faster (Fig. 3Down, lanes 3 and 4).


Figure 3
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Strain-specific electrophoretic mobility of PrPres produced in RK13 cells. PrPres from moRK13 cells infected with Chandler or Fukuoka-1 (lanes 1 and 2) or from voRK13 cells infected with cattle BSE or sheep BSE agent (lanes 3 and 4) was deglycosylated by PNGaseF treatment and analysed by immunoblotting with mAb Sha31. M, Biotinylated molecular mass marker proteins (kDa).

 
Biological characterization of the prion strains propagated in RK13 cells
Fukuoka-1 and vole-adapted BSE strains propagated for 2 months in moRK13 and voRK13 cells, respectively, were inoculated into relevant indicator animals (tga20 mice or bank voles, respectively). All inoculated animals died with typical neurological symptoms (Table 1Down). The survival time of tga20 mice inoculated with moRK13 cultures (3x105 cells per mouse) was 127±3 days, and all had PrPres in their brain, the pattern of which was indistinguishable from that in the brain material used as inoculum (data not shown). Bank voles inoculated with infected voRK13 cultures (3x106 cells) had a survival time of 90±5 days, an incubation period similar to that obtained when the strain was grown in the animal (Piening et al., 2006Down). No detectable infectivity was associated with inoculated cells expressing no bank vole PrPC (parental RK13 cells, Table 1Down). All of the diseased bank voles showed PrPres in the brain with an electrophoretic pattern indistinguishable from that in the original inoculum (data not shown). These results demonstrated that mouse and bank vole infectious prions are propagated efficiently in RK13 cells.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Bioassay of infected cultures

 
To determine whether the biological properties of the strains were modified after multiplication in RK13 cells, we analysed the brains of animals inoculated with three cell-passaged strains of prion. PrPres distribution (Schulz-Schaeffer et al., 2000Down; Taraboulos et al., 1992Down) and the extent of vacuolation in selected brain areas as originally described by Fraser & Dickinson (1968)Down were used to investigate strain-specific features. The PrPres regional distribution in tga20 mice inoculated with cell-passaged Fukuoka-1 and 22L strains was compared by histoblotting with that of Fukuoka-1 and 22L serially passaged in the same mouse line. As illustrated in Fig. 4(a)Down, PrPres distribution was essentially similar in both groups, but was clearly distinguishable between the Fukuoka-1 and 22L strains. After infection by RK13- or mouse-passaged Fukuoka-1 strain, PrPres deposits were diffuse and present in numerous areas of the brain such as the fimbria, corpus callosum, anteromedial thalamus nuclei and, to a lesser extent, the lateral hypothalamus (Fig. 4aDown and data not shown). 22L staining was more punctate and for both groups predominantly involved the septum, basal nuclei, anteromedial and ventral thalamic nuclei, lateral hypothalamus, habenular nuclei, inferior colliculus, raphe nuclei and aqueduct region (Fig. 4aDown and data not shown). voRK13- and bank vole-passaged sheep BSE caused indistinguishable PrPres distribution, as assessed by PET blot analysis of bank vole brains (Fig. 4bDown). Accumulation of PrPres was evident throughout the brain and in particular in the medulla, cerebellar nuclei, lateral geniculate nuclei, superior colliculus, red nucleus, thalamic nuclei, septum and cingulate, and parietal cortices. The lesion profile in the brains of bank voles inoculated with infected voRK13 cells was also determined (Fig. 4cDown). Bank vole- and voRK13-passaged sheep BSE produced identical patterns of vacuolar degeneration in bank voles, characterized by abundant grey-matter spongiform degeneration in all brain areas examined with the exception of the cerebellum. Collectively, these findings supported the view that the three strains studied were not modified through multiplication in RK13 cells.


Figure 4
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Regional distribution of PrPres and vacuoles in the brains of animals infected with RK13-passaged strains. (a) Histoblots of coronal sections (at the level of the basal nuclei) comparing the distribution of PrPres deposits in the brains of tga20 transgenic mice infected with moRK13 cell- or mouse-passaged Fukuoka-1 and 22L strains. (b) Comparison of PrPres distribution by PET blot analysis of coronal sections of bank voles inoculated with voRK13-passaged (second passage, upper panels) or bank vole-passaged (middle panels) sheep BSE agent. The lower panels show sections from a healthy control vole. (c) Lesion profiles in voles inoculated with voRK13 cells infected with the sheep BSE agent ({blacktriangleup}, first passage; {blacksquare}, second passage) or with the vole-passaged sheep BSE agent ({blacktriangledown}). Brain-scoring positions are medulla (1), cerebellum (2), superior colliculus (3), hypothalamus (4), thalamus (5), hippocampus (6), septum (7), retrosplenial and adjacent motor cortex (8) and cingulate and adjacent motor cortex (9).

 
A pharmacological assay for BSE-type agent
A limited number of compounds has been tested for anti-prion activity in animal models infected with BSE-derived agents (for a review, see Trevitt & Collinge, 2006Down). To determine whether the multiplication of bank vole-adapted BSE agent was sensitive to pharmacological treatment, infected cultures were incubated for 1 week in the presence of DS 500 and the amphotericin B derivative MS-8209, two molecules known to delay the onset of disease in experimentally infected rodents (Adjou et al., 1995Down; Ehlers & Diringer, 1984Down). Fig. 5Down shows that DS 500 and MS-8209 decreased PrPres levels in infected, treated voRK13 cultures. As no cell system enabling replication of cattle BSE or human vCJD agents is available to date, voRK13 cells, together with a recently identified cell line permissive to mouse-adapted BSE (Iwamaru et al., 2007Down), may provide improved tools for the screening of drugs potentially effective against this human-affecting agent.


Figure 5
View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Pharmacological treatment of voRK13 cells infected with vole-adapted BSE. Duplicate cultures of voRK13 cells infected with the sheep BSE agent were treated for 5 days with DS 500 (1 µg ml–1), MS-8209 (50 µg ml–1) or with vehicle only (control). PrPres was detected with mAb Sha31.

 
In conclusion, we have shown here that strain-specific features of PrPres were maintained following serial multiplication in RK13 cells and that cell multiplication did not affect the disease phenotype when infected cultures were inoculated back into animals, suggesting that the RK13 cell line is able to propagate prion strains faithfully from different species. During preparation of this manuscript, the mouse-adapted M1000 prion strain was reported to multiply in RK13 cells constitutively expressing mouse PrPC (Vella et al., 2007Down), confirming that RK13 represents an interesting biological cell system to study how distinct abnormal PrP from various prion strains and species can be generated in a single cell type. This cell model may provide new opportunities for investigating the basis of strain identity.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank S. Lehmann and R. Carp for kindly providing the mouse strain materials. We also acknowledge J. Grassi (CEA, Saclay, France) for 4F2, 12F10 and Sha31 mAbs; C. Weissmann for tga20 mice; and S. Lehmann for pTREmoPrP plasmid. We thank L. J. Vella (University of Melbourne, Australia), R. A. Sharples (University of Melbourne, Australia), P. Thebault (INRA) for their assistance and V. Beringue (INRA) for helpful discussions. A. F. H. is an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council R. D. Wright Fellow. S. P. was supported by a fellowship from INRA, the Ile de France region and by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale. N. D., M.-P. C. and this work were partially supported by a grant from the European Union (projects EuroVolTE QLRI-CT-2002–81333).


   REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Adjou, K. T., Demaimay, R., Lasmezas, C., Deslys, J. P., Seman, M. & Dormont, D. (1995). MS-8209, a new amphotericin B derivative, provides enhanced efficacy in delaying hamster scrapie. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39, 2810–2812.[Abstract]

Arima, K., Nishida, N., Sakaguchi, S., Shigematsu, K., Atarashi, R., Yamaguchi, N., Yoshikawa, D., Yoon, J., Watanabe, K. & other authors (2005). Biological and biochemical characteristics of prion strains conserved in persistently infected cell cultures. J Virol 79, 7104–7112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Baron, G. S., Magalhaes, A. C., Prado, M. A. & Caughey, B. (2006). Mouse-adapted scrapie infection of SN56 cells: greater efficiency with microsome-associated versus purified PrP-res. J Virol 80, 2106–2117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Beringue, V., Bencsik, A., Le Dur, A., Reine, F., Lai, T. L., Chenais, N., Tilly, G., Biacabe, A. G., Baron, T. & other authors (2006). Isolation from cattle of a prion strain distinct from that causing bovine spongiform encephalopathy. PLoS Pathog 2, e112[CrossRef][Medline]

Beringue, V., Andreoletti, O., Le Dur, A., Essalmani, R., Vilotte, J. L., Lacroux, C., Reine, F., Herzog, L., Biacabe, A. G. & other authors (2007). A bovine prion acquires an epidemic bovine spongiform encephalopathy strain-like phenotype on interspecies transmission. J Neurosci 27, 6965–6971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bosque, P. J. & Prusiner, S. B. (2000). Cultured cell sublines highly susceptible to prion infection. J Virol 74, 4377–4386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bruce, M. E. & Fraser, H. (1991). Scrapie strain variation and its implications. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 172, 125–138.[Medline]

Bueler, H., Aguzzi, A., Sailer, A., Greiner, R. A., Autenried, P., Aguet, M. & Weissmann, C. (1993). Mice devoid of PrP are resistant to scrapie. Cell 73, 1339–1347.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cartoni, C., Schinina, M. E., Maras, B., Nonno, R., Vaccari, G., Di Baria, M. A., Conte, M., Liu, Q. G., Lu, M. & other authors (2005). Identification of the pathological prion protein allotypes in scrapie-infected heterozygous bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1081, 122–126.[CrossRef][Medline]

Castilla, J., Gutierrez Adan, A., Brun, A., Pintado, B., Ramirez, M. A., Parra, B., Doyle, D., Rogers, M., Salguero, F. J. & other authors (2003). Early detection of PrPres in BSE-infected bovine PrP transgenic mice. Arch Virol 148, 677–691.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chandler, R. L. & Turfrey, B. A. (1972). Inoculation of voles, Chinese hamsters, gerbils and guinea-pigs with scrapie brain material. Res Vet Sci 13, 219–224.[Medline]

Daude, N., Marella, M. & Chabry, J. (2003). Specific inhibition of pathological prion protein accumulation by small interfering RNAs. J Cell Sci 116, 2775–2779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ehlers, B. & Diringer, H. (1984). Dextran sulphate 500 delays and prevents mouse scrapie by impairment of agent replication in spleen. J Gen Virol 65, 1325–1330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eloit, M., Adjou, K., Coulpier, M., Fontaine, J. J., Hamel, R., Lilin, T., Messiaen, S., Andreoletti, O., Baron, T. & other authors (2005). BSE agent signatures in a goat. Vet Rec 156, 523–524.[Free Full Text]

Enari, M., Flechsig, E. & Weissmann, C. (2001). Scrapie prion protein accumulation by scrapie-infected neuroblastoma cells abrogated by exposure to a prion protein antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 9295–9299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Feraudet, C., Morel, N., Simon, S., Volland, H., Frobert, Y. F., Creminon, C., Vilette, D., Lehmann, S. & Grassi, J. (2005). Screening of 145 anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies for their capacity to inhibit PrPSc replication in infected cells. J Biol Chem 280, 11247–11258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fischer, M., Rulicke, T., Raeber, A., Sailer, A., Moser, M., Oesch, B., Brandner, S., Aguzzi, A. & Weissmann, C. (1996). Prion protein (PrP) with amino-proximal deletions restoring susceptibility of PrP knockout mice to scrapie. EMBO J 15, 1255–1264.[Medline]

Fraser, H. & Dickinson, A. G. (1968). The sequential development of the brain lesion of scrapie in three strains of mice. J Comp Pathol 78, 301–311.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hill, A. F., Desbruslais, M., Joiner, S., Sidle, K. C., Gowland, I., Collinge, J., Doey, L. J. & Lantos, P. (1997). The same prion strain causes vCJD and BSE. Nature 389, 448–450.[CrossRef][Medline]

Houston, F., Foster, J. D., Chong, A., Hunter, N. & Bostock, C. J. (2000). Transmission of BSE by blood transfusion in sheep. Lancet 356, 999–1000.[CrossRef][Medline]

Iwamaru, Y., Takenouchi, T., Ogihara, K., Hoshino, M., Takata, M., Imamura, M., Tagawa, Y., Hayashi-Kato, H., Ushiki-Kaku, Y. & other authors (2007). Microglial cell line established from prion protein-overexpressing mice is susceptible to various murine prion strains. J Virol 81, 1524–1527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Klohn, P. C., Stoltze, L., Flechsig, E., Enari, M. & Weissmann, C. (2003). A quantitative, highly sensitive cell-based infectivity assay for mouse scrapie prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 11666–11671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Krasemann, S., Groschup, M., Hunsmann, G. & Bodemer, W. (1996). Induction of antibodies against human prion proteins (PrP) by DNA-mediated immunization of PrP0/0 mice. J Immunol Methods 199, 109–118.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nonno, R., Di Bari, M. A., Cardone, F., Vaccari, G., Fazzi, P., Dell'Omo, G., Cartoni, C., Ingrosso, L., Boyle, A. & other authors (2006). Efficient transmission and characterization of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease strains in bank voles. PLoS Pathog 2, e12[CrossRef][Medline]

Paquet, S., Sabuncu, E., Delaunay, J. L., Laude, H. & Vilette, D. (2004). Prion infection of epithelial Rov cells is a polarized event. J Virol 78, 7148–7152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Piening, N., Nonno, R., Di Bari, M., Walter, S., Windl, O., Agrimi, U., Kretzschmar, H. A. & Bertsch, U. (2006). Conversion efficiency of bank vole prion protein in vitro is determined by residues 155 and 170, but does not correlate with the high susceptibility of bank voles to sheep scrapie in vivo. J Biol Chem 281, 9373–9384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Raeber, A. J., Sailer, A., Hegyi, I., Klein, M. A., Rulicke, T., Fischer, M., Brandner, S., Aguzzi, A. & Weissmann, C. (1999). Ectopic expression of prion protein (PrP) in T lymphocytes or hepatocytes of PrP knockout mice is insufficient to sustain prion replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96, 3987–3992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schulz-Schaeffer, W. J., Tschoke, S., Kranefuss, N., Drose, W., Hause-Reitner, D., Giese, A., Groschup, M. H. & Kretzschmar, H. A. (2000). The paraffin-embedded tissue blot detects PrPSc early in the incubation time in prion diseases. Am J Pathol 156, 51–56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Scott, M. R., Safar, J., Telling, G., Nguyen, O., Groth, D., Torchia, M., Koehler, R., Tremblay, P., Walther, D. & other authors (1997). Identification of a prion protein epitope modulating transmission of bovine spongiform encephalopathy prions to transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94, 14279–14284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Taraboulos, A., Jendroska, K., Serban, D., Yang, S. L., DeArmond, S. J. & Prusiner, S. B. (1992). Regional mapping of prion proteins in brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89, 7620–7624.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tateishi, J., Ohta, M., Koga, M., Sato, Y. & Kuroiwa, Y. (1979). Transmission of chronic spongiform encephalopathy with kuru plaques from humans to small rodents. Ann Neurol 5, 581–584.[CrossRef][Medline]

Trevitt, C. R. & Collinge, J. (2006). A systematic review of prion therapeutics in experimental models. Brain 129, 2241–2265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vella, L. J., Sharples, R. A., Lawson, V. A., Masters, C. L., Cappai, R. & Hill, A. F. (2007). Packaging of prions into exosomes is associated with a novel pathway of PrP processing. J Pathol 211, 582–590.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vilette, D. (2008). Cell models of prion infection. Vet Res in press

Vilette, D., Andreoletti, O., Archer, F., Madelaine, M. F., Vilotte, J. L., Lehmann, S. & Laude, H. (2001). Ex vivo propagation of infectious sheep scrapie agent in heterologous epithelial cells expressing ovine prion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 4055–4059.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vorberg, I., Raines, A., Story, B. & Priola, S. A. (2004). Susceptibility of common fibroblast cell lines to transmissible spongiform encephalopathy agents. J Infect Dis 189, 431–439.[CrossRef][Medline]

Received 31 July 2007; accepted 29 September 2007.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. Akimov, O. Yakovleva, I. Vasilyeva, C. McKenzie, and L. Cervenakova
Persistent Propagation of Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Agent in Murine Spleen Stromal Cell Culture with Features of Mesenchymal Stem Cells
J. Virol., November 1, 2008; 82(21): 10959 - 10962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Courageot, M.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Vilette, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Courageot, M.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Vilette, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Courageot, M.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Vilette, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL
J MED MICROBIOL ALL SGM JOURNALS